The American Securitization Forum has published an implementation guide to the due diligence requirements for securitization positions under the market risk rule issued by the federal bank regulators in August, as well as guidance the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency put out this past June. One of the primary purposes behind the rule and the guidance was to lessen industry dependence on credit ratings and to promote instead greater reliance upon proper due diligence. “With the adoption of the final rules, market participants have been working...

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have reduced their dependency on U.S. government support, but there may be restructuring issues within the budget talks to resolve the looming “fiscal cliff,” according to Fitch Ratings. Fitch this week affirmed its “AAA” rating for both Fannie and Freddie even as its outlook for the two GSEs remains “negative.” However, the rating agency warned that its outlook for Fannie and Freddie depends upon the economy and the ability of political leaders to come to an accord on taxes and government spending before year’s end.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has announced this week that the maximum conforming loan limits for mortgages acquired by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2013 will remain at existing levels. In most of the country, the loan limit – established under the terms of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 – are calculated each year. HERA sets loan limits as a function of median home values in local areas.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s proposal to levy extra guaranty fee charges on GSE mortgages originated in five slow-foreclosure states attracted nearly universal calls to curtail or even to outright scrap the measure from industry participants and from lawmakers. If implemented as proposed, the FHFA would target Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and New York for an additional, one-shot g-fee of between 15 and 30 basis points in 2013.

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled earlier this month that a 2010 Federal Housing Finance Agency directive advising Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac against purchasing mortgages laden with certain first-priority lien obligations under the Property Assessed Clean Energy program is not tantamount to a rulemaking that can be challenged in court. The ruling rejected a challenge by Leon County, FL, to uphold its PACE program. The county claimed the FHFA had engaged in rulemaking without the required notice and comment period in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.The circuit court’s opinion by Judge Rosemary Barkett found the Finance Agency’s action was consistent with its congressionally defined role as conservator under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency will employ a new, more comprehensive examination rating system which would be used to inspect Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Home Loan Banks and the Banks’ Office of Finance under a final rule issued earlier this month. The new system, published in the Nov. 13 Federal Register, will implement a single risk-focused examination system for all three entities that would be similar to the “CAMELS” ratings used by federal prudential regulators for depository institutions.

For the third time in as many months, a federal judge has summarily dismissed a securities class action lawsuit against a former Fannie Mae executive. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon threw out the case against Leanne Spencer, Fannie’s former controller, brought nearly a decade ago by investors hoping to recover damages. Two Ohio pension funds – the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio – filed suit in 2004 related to a $6.3 billion overstatement of earnings against Fannie and three former GSE executives, including CEO Franklin Raines.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month announced new, synchronized requirements regarding the management of law firms for default servicing, bankruptcies, foreclosures and related litigation involving mortgages owned or guaranteed by the two GSEs. Effective June 1, 2013, Fannie’s and Freddie’s servicers will be allowed to choose their own attorneys, create their own processes for managing foreclosure processing and maintain direct relationships with their law firms. The new rules also require servicers to establish procedures to manage and monitor all aspects of the law firm’s performance and compliance with applicable requirements. Upon request, servicers will be required to perform a due diligence review and notify the GSEs of the result.Fannie’s and Freddie’s new rules were issued at the direction of the GSEs’ conservator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The directive comes more than a year after the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General dinged the agency for lax oversight of the GSEs and problems involving improper foreclosure practices with their affiliated law firms.

A law professor says there is no quick solution to the mortgage industry’s foreclosure mess and the resulting legal chaos, but moving to a single electronic note/mortgage transfer system would solve much of what caused the crisis to begin with. “Massive originations of mortgage loans relying on the sell-to-distribute model, followed by massive foreclosures, have led to chaos in the legal processes to track who may foreclose and sell homes,” said Alan White, professor of law at Valparaiso Law School ...