For the past 18 years, listeners to the nationally-syndicated Dave Ramsey Show have heard the host recommend Nashville-based Churchill Mortgage. While Ramsey’s debt-free living message might seem at odds with a mortgage banking company issuing loans, Churchill Mortgage has found in Ramsey an excellent partner. “We get phone calls and hits to our website from every state in the country,” said Matt Clarke, Churchill’s CFO and COO. “The population of callers is largely high quality borrowers.” Churchill has been a sponsor of the Dave Ramsey show since it began, and continues to reap benefits. The question...

The one category of distressed loan that the federal government has the most control over – mortgages insured by the FHA and VA – continues to show the worst success rates for loan modifications. After 12 months of post-modification seasoning, over half (51 percent) of government-insured loans were 60 days or more past due, according to a report issued this week by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. That compared to an overall 60+ re-default rate of 39 percent. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgages, along with loans held in the servicer’s portfolio, showed the best...

Some mortgage servicers have done a better job than others in adjusting to a market environment of high default and foreclosure rates, according to a new Barclays Capital report, and the difference can have a significant impact on the value of non-agency mortgage securities they service. Servicing is not as easy as it used to be and has come much more under the spotlight, Barclays noted. Servicers have to work with distressed borrowers to determine whether loan modification, refinance or liquidation is the most appropriate response. Servicer performance can be shaped by the composition of...

The timing and method of disposing of real estate owned properties will have significant implications for home prices, according to Fitch Ratings analysts. The supply of REO homes is unprecedented, with the large overhang of distressed properties in the housing market and weak demand, analysts said. The REO industry estimates that more than 2 million properties nationwide are in foreclosure and that 25 percent to 35 percent of all home sales are related to properties whose mortgages have defaulted. In a recent home-price projection report, which uses the rating agency’s Sustainable Home...

The outcome of the securities fraud case leveled against six former top executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could hinge on what exactly is considered a subprime loan. At least one defendant is prepared to argue that there is no standard definition.In fact, the GSEs appear to still be reporting their subprime and Alt A exposure in much the same way they did in the period covered by the Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuits.Late last week, the SEC pulled the trigger on its three-year investigation of claims that the two GSEs failed to disclose to investors the companies’ exposure to subprime mortgages prior to the 2008 housing market crash.

Industry trade groups, as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s regulator, are questioning the wisdom of Congress as lawmakers in both chambers have bills pending to hike the fees charged to guarantee GSE mortgages as a way to help offset the cost of extending the payroll tax cut through 2012.Both House and Senate versions of tax cut extension bills would add an additional 10 basis points to the guarantee fees charged by Fannie and Freddie through 2021. The increase would offset about $35.7 billion in costs, including $1.3 billion in the first year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.As Inside the GSEs went to press, the prospect of any tax cut extension was in doubt after the House rejected the bill calling for a two-month extension. Instead, House Republicans demanded immediate talks with the Senate on a year-long plan but the Senate ruled out further negotiations until the House passes the stop-gap measure.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris filed suit this week against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, taking up a notch her probe of the two GSEs’ mortgage lending and foreclosure practices.The lawsuits, filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco, seek to compel the companies to turn over documents the AG’s office had sought through a subpoena served to the two companies on Nov. 15.The Federal Housing Finance Agency directed Fannie and Freddie not to respond to the subpoenas.The subpoenas sought information about how Fannie and Freddie are handling thousands of foreclosed properties, as well as details about the GSEs’ mortgage-servicing and home-repossession practices.

The official watchdog of the Federal Housing Finance Agency found a sympathetic audience in senators last week as the head of the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General sounded a now-familiar refrain – that the Finance Agency is falling short in its oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.Testifying before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, FHFA Inspector General Steve Linick said the OIG has identified “deficiencies” in Finance Agency operations which appear to reflect two “significant and related trends.” First, the FHFA has relied too much on the determinations of the two GSEs without independently testing and validating those determinations, testified Linick. “Second, FHFA was not proactive in oversight and enforcement and accordingly, resource allocations may have affected its ability to oversee the GSEs and enforce its directives,” said Linick. “Both trends have emerged in a number of our reports.”

The Federal Housing Finance Agency last week filed suit against the city of Chicago claiming that its attempt to enforce a recently amended vacant buildings ordinance on properties owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “impermissibly encroaches” on the FHFA’s role as sole regulator of the GSEs.Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the FHFA’s lawsuit on behalf of the two GSEs seeks to prevent the city from enforcing the ordinance which requires mortgagees to pay a $500 registration fee for vacant properties and requires monthly inspections of mortgage properties to determine if they are vacant. "The ordinance would impose on the enterprises the responsibilities, but not the benefits of ownership of vacant property on which they hold the mortgage,” said the FHFA in a statement. “The ordinance would create risks and liabilities for the enterprises at a time when they are already supported by taxpayers, including those in the city of Chicago.”

The Federal Housing Finance Agency should refrain from implementing a proposal that would overhaul the mortgage servicing compensation system as it has failed to make a “compelling case” as to why it is necessary to change a system that has “worked well for decades,” according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.In a comment letter sent to the Finance Agency earlier this month, MBA President and CEO David Stevens said the FHFA’s proposed changes would dramatically alter residential servicing, origination and secondary market operations, not necessarily for the better.“The current servicer compensation model is still the best approach and making radical changes, like the proposed ‘fee-for-service,’ will have dramatic impacts not just on originators, servicers and investors but also on borrowers in both the costs they pay to get a mortgage and the support they receive from their servicers,” said Stevens.