The Senate’s GSE reform proposal in its current form would create an extremely high risk for Freddie Mac’s core policy functions during the bill’s proposed five-year wind down of the company, Freddie’s chief executive warned. In a confidential memo to Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Mel Watt that was leaked to the media, Freddie CEO Donald Layton said that the housing finance reform legislation by Sens. Tim Johnson, D-SD, and Mike Crapo, R-ID, fails to state clearly that the GSEs’ core policy function must be maintained and such an omission would create potentially crippling uncertainty among staffers during the transition.

While the housing finance reform legislation authored by Sens. Tim Johnson, D-SD, and Mike Crapo, R-ID, recognizes the “distinct nature and role of the Federal Home Loan Banks,” concern remains that the bill’s treatment of FHLBank regulation within the proposed regulator could lead to a conflict of interest that impedes the 12 Banks and their members, according to the American Bankers Association. An ABA memo to the members of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee suggested that lawmakers leave regulation of the FHLBanks with either an independent agency or strengthen the bill’s proposed regulatory firewalls.

Although recently installed Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Mel Watt delayed an increase in guaranty fees earlier this year, executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have told some mortgage executives in private conversations that raising g-fees may not be a bad idea, according to industry officials briefed on the matter. “They’re actively saying they want an increase in g-fees,” said one source, speaking about the GSEs. However, others suggest that the situation needs to be placed into context. The FHFA and the GSEs may be working on a deal to reduce charges tied to loan-level price adjustments.

Building on the success of its previously issued Structured Agency Credit Risk debt notes, expect Freddie Mac to continue to crank out additional risk-sharing deals, while the GSE pursues reinsurance opportunities to further mitigate risk, say company officials and industry observers. Last week, Freddie announced it has reduced taxpayer exposure by obtaining insurance policies for a combined maximum of $269.5 million of losses to a portion of the credit risk associated with a pool of single-family loans funded in the first quarter of 2013. The GSE said the policies were underwritten by a group of well-capitalized and well-established insurers and reinsurers and were obtained under Freddie’s Agency Credit Insurance Structure, which has attracted private capital from non-mortgage guaranty insurers and reinsurers.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency should immediately suspend assessments of compensatory fees for servicers that miss GSE foreclosure timeframes, according to a new letter from the Mortgage Bankers Association. Instead, MBA is offering to create a plan with a “more holistic method of identifying and penalizing servicer under-performance.” In correspondence dispatched to FHFA Director Mel Watt this week, MBA President and CEO David Stevens says the imposition of compensatory fees has morphed into a risk-sharing mechanism that shifts the costs of the prolonged foreclosure process from the GSEs onto mortgage servicers.

Freddie Mac Multifamily now will purchase from its Targeted Affordable Housing lender network multifamily tax-exempt loans, and aggregate and securitize them into a new series called M-Deals, the GSE announced last week. The move is in concert with the firm’s launch of a new initiative – the Direct Purchase of Tax-Exempt Loans – to help keep rental housing affordable for lower income families and increase cost-effective financing for tax-exempt multifamily properties. Freddie explained these are tax-exempt loans issued by a city, county or state housing finance entity for apartments that have affordable rents for lower income individuals.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency will begin to collect additional, more specific personal information on borrowers and loans as part of the National Mortgage Database project the agency is developing in concert with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. An FHFA announcement and request for comment published in the April 28 Federal Register notes that under a “revised system of records,” the database will begin collecting demographic and personal contact info for borrowers and their households, as well as loan-level data on mortgage performance.

Officials at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac enthusiastically jumped on board a high-profile effort begun by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau last week to promote eClosings as a way to reduce or eliminate many of the “pain points” associated with the mortgage closing process. At a public forum at its headquarters in Washington, DC, the CFPB announced it would launch a new, voluntary pilot project later this year that supporters hope will re-invigorate government housing agency officials, mortgage bankers and industry technology representatives and take their previous efforts related to eMortgages to a much higher level.

KBW: Fannie, Freddie Emerging From Conservatorship ‘Increasingly Plausible.’ The battle over the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac likely will rage on for the rest of the decade, but it’s “increasingly plausible” that the two government-controlled mortgage giants will emerge from conservatorship, according to a new report from Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. However, KBW Analyst Brian Gardner readily admits that the firm is unsure “how or when” the Treasury Department or Federal Housing Finance Agency can legally take the two out of conservatorship.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issued $45.4 billion in single-family mortgage-backed securities during the month of April, a 20.6 percent increase from March, reversing more than a year-long streak of declines, according to an Inside The GSEs analysis. However, April’s MBS issuance was down 63.0 percent from the same period a year ago.Top-ranked Wells Fargo’s Fannie and Freddie securitization, at $6.28 billion, rose by 23.1 percent on a monthly basis but dropped 73.3 percent year-to-date.