A New York federal judge has allowed the Justice Department to proceed with its civil fraud lawsuit against Bank of America in connection with the packaging and sale of mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but not before dismissing a significant portion of the government’s claim. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff dismissed claims for damages and penalties under the False Claims Act in an expedited ruling two weeks ago. In October 2012, the government filed suit against BofA, as successor to Countrywide, alleging BofA inherited and continued to operate Countrywide’s loan program known as the “Hustle.”

A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, overturning a lower court ruling that the counties and state of Michigan were entitled to collect local real estate transfer taxes from the two government-sponsored enterprises. This week’s unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said the lower court is not in a position to second-guess Congress by creating exemptions to tax statutes. “The statutes at issue here plainly state that the defendants are exempt from ‘all taxation,’” the court ruled. In June 2011, Oakland and Genesee counties each filed suit claiming Fannie and Freddie recorded deeds and other conveyances without paying the Michigan Transfer Tax.

Whichever way the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of presidential recess appointments, the decision would probably cause more uncertainty and turbulence in the industries the ruling will likely affect, according to legal and policy analysts. SCOTUS is considering a petition filed last month by the Obama administration and the National Labor Relations Board to review a controversial ruling by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals that calls into question the validity of President Obama’s appointment of three new members of the board in January. In Noel Canning v. NLRB, the plaintiff challenged...

SunTrust Mortgage is in settlement discussions with the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Justice over alleged violation of the False Claims Act in connection with the bank’s origination of FHA loans. The Atlanta-based mortgage lender disclosed the ongoing talks in a recent regulatory filing after being notified by the agencies of the results of their preliminary investigation during the first quarter of 2013. Even with the ongoing settlement talks, SunTrust continued to deny any wrongdoing, making clear its disagreement with the government’s analysis and methodology. It gave no further ...

Changes to the FHA’s mortgage insurance premium cancellation policy, which take effect on June 3, could ultimately cause some FHA loans closed after the effective date to become a “higher-priced mortgage loan” that no investor would want to purchase, lenders warned. Eliminating the MIP cancellation and requiring insurance to be kept for the life of the mortgage loan will raise the annual percentage rate 150 basis points above the average prime offer rate (APOR) index. This will trigger a higher-priced mortgage loan (HPML) designation for some ...

FHA lenders now face more stringent default monitoring and reporting requirements as federal housing regulators try to keep close tabs on loan performance to reduce losses to the FHA insurance fund. New guidance issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development requires FHA lenders to use new status codes in their monthly reporting of delinquent single-family mortgages, special forbearances and trial payment plans. At the same time, HUD announced a new reporting requirement for FHA loan modifications in which the servicer receives no incentives. The requirement to use the new codes and to ...

Efforts by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to use the False Claims Act to recoup $1 billion in losses suffered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have suffered a big setback. Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff dismissed claims for treble damages and penalties the federal government brought under the FCA against Bank of America as successor to Countrywide Financial for allegedly selling defective loans to the two government-sponsored enterprises while representing that the mortgages complied with their requirements. The government asserted...

Fannie Mae and its former auditor KPMG LLP have agreed to pay $153 million to resolve a long-simmering class action lawsuit brought by investors seeking to recover damages, according to an announcement Tuesday by Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine. Two Ohio pension funds – the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio – filed suit in 2004 related to a $6.3 billion overstatement of earnings against Fannie and three former GSE executives, including then-CEO Franklin Raines.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced this week that he plans to file lawsuits against Bank of America and Wells Fargo for failing to comply with servicing standards included in the $25 billion national servicing settlement. Other states appear likely to join the action, though the litigation might not have much of an impact on the servicers, according to industry analysts. “My office has received a significant number of complaints regarding the flagrant violations by Bank of America and Wells Fargo of the loan modification timeline requirements contained in [the settlement],” Schneiderman said in a letter to the committee monitoring the settlement. BofA and Wells, along with Ally Financial, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase, have had to comply...

Standard & Poor’s, along with Moody’s Investors Service, last week settled a lawsuit involving their pre-financial crisis securities ratings before it got to a jury trial, but S&P suffered a setback with another ratings challenge lawsuit brought by Connecticut state officials. Experts predict a pickup in MBS litigation ahead of pending filing deadlines for legal challenges. S&P and Moody’s reached the confidential settlement with a group of 14 plantiffs led by Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and King County, WA. Abu Dhabi and the over investors filed suit in 2008 and 2009 in Manhattan federal court claiming that the defendants misled them by allegedly inflating ratings on two structured investment vehicles they purchased. By settling the investors’ lawsuit, which claimed $638 million in losses, S&P and Moody’s were able...