A Manhattan federal judge earlier this month dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Standard & Poor’s Financial Services after finding no evidence that the rating agency defrauded investors when it gave a favorable rating to Fannie Mae stock prior to the financial crisis.The suit, filed in December 2012 on behalf of potentially hundreds of thousands of investors who bought stock in an offering by Fannie in May 2008, four months before the GSE was taken over by the government, alleged that S&P knowingly misrated Fannie’s stock. Valued at about $25 per share when it was issued, the stock dropped to about $3 per share after Fannie’s government conservatorship began in September 2008.

A recent decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on a key aspect of the timing of securities lawsuits – squarely at odds with the ruling of another federal appeals court – has called into the question the legal viability of a 40-year-old Supreme Court precedent, prompting expectations that the high court will eventually clarify the conflict. The Second Circuit on June 27 ruled in Police & Fire System of City of Detroit v. IndyMac MBS Inc. to uphold a lower court ruling that blocked retirement systems from intervening in a putative class action that accused several major banks – including IndyMac, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs – of misrepresenting certain MBS. The groups had attempted...

The Republican leadership of the House Financial Services Committee this week unveiled a comprehensive housing finance reform bill, including a series of proposals to “right size” the FHA, redefine its mission and reestablish it as a stand-alone agency. At the same time, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Johnson, D-SD, and Ranking Member Mike Crapo, R-ID, announced they have reached a bipartisan agreement on legislation that would ensure the solvency of the FHA. Both lawmakers expect to introduce a bill next week. The House FHA reform measures were introduced in tandem with reform proposals for ...

The FHA has proposed measures to strengthen its oversight of FHA lenders and each measure could potentially increase lenders’ liability and compliance risk, compliance experts warned. Published for comment in the July 9 Federal Register, the proposals are part of a new enforcement regime that the FHA is considering to monitor and sanction lenders. They cover statistical sampling, origination quality standards, annual reviews, compare ratios, and indemnification and other remedies for loan defects. The proposed enforcement measures, however, raise a ...

The New York State Department of Financial Services has directed FHA lenders to refrain from applying the FHA’s higher mortgage insurance premiums in calculating a loan’s annual percentage rate and fully indexed rates for 60 days to prevent loans from becoming “high cost” or subprime. At the same time, the department issued guidance to conventional lenders on how to interpret existing provisions in state banking law regarding subprime loans. Statutory changes were made in 2009 to prevent some loans from becoming “subprime,” as defined by state law. Spikes in mortgage interest rates in the past few weeks plus ...

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is adopting the mortgage banking industry’s data standards format for the FHA’s TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard, which HUD uses to evaluate the credit risk of FHA loans that are submitted through an automated underwriting system. The standards were developed by the Mortgage Industry Standard Maintenance Organization (MISMO), a nonprofit subsidiary of the Mortgage Bankers Association. MISMO is an open data standards group that promotes consistency among mortgage transaction participants to reduce loan processing costs, increase transparency, and ultimately ...

Two different groups holding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stock filed suit against the government this week claiming that the Treasury Department and the Federal Housing Finance Agency are illegally poaching the profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that should go to shareholders. The FHFA and Treasury illegally implemented the so-called sweep amendment last summer that altered Fannie’s and Freddie’s preferred stock purchase agreements, according to the suits. The amended agreement allows the government to seize nearly all the profits of the two government-sponsored enterprises. This is a direct violation of the 2008 conservatorship legislation, according to the lawsuit filed by hedge fund Perry Capital in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Less than two days later, Fairholme Capital Management filed...

The mortgage banking industry recently declared victory in the wake of a federal appeals court decision to overturn a previous court ruling, which had upheld a 2010 administrative interpretation by the Department of Labor that mortgage loan officers are entitled to overtime pay. In Mortgage Bankers Association v. Seth D. Harris, acting secretary of U.S. Department of Labor, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed a lower court’s decision denying the MBA’s motion for summary judgment. At the same time, the appellate court remanded the case to the district court with instructions to vacate the DOL’s 2010 interpretation of the administrative exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court, however, left...

Two insurance industry trade groups recently filed suit in federal district court to contest the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s final rule formalizing its “disparate impact” interpretation of the Fair Housing Act, which asserts that housing policies and practices can be deemed discriminatory not only through their intent but also by their effects. The rule, issued in early February, formally establishes the three-part burden-shifting test for determining when a practice with a discriminatory effect violates the Fair Housing Act. The American Insurance Association and the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, whose members sell homeowners insurance, challenged...

A Wells Fargo securities trial is underway in Minnesota federal district court where jurors will decide whether the financial institution had misrepresented the safety and soundness of its securities lending program and lied to investors about the risks involved or whether the economic crisis was to blame for investor losses. The securities lending program (SLP) was marketed to large institutional investors, including pension funds. As part of the SLP, Wells Fargo held the participants’ securities in custodial accounts and loaned them temporarily to brokers. The brokers then posted cash collateral, which the bank invested until the securities were returned. Under agreements with SLP participants, Wells Fargo acted...