The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a petition to review a federal appeals court decision to reinstate a securities class action lawsuit filed by MBS investors against Goldman Sachs. In denying the petition, the SCOTUS let stand a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to overturn a lower court’s decision to dismiss the plaintiff’s suit for lack of standing and for failure to show injury.

The mystery surrounding how much Fannie Mae really earned in the fourth quarter – and full year – could be solved by the end of next week, as the Federal Housing Finance Agency softens its stance toward allowing the GSE to capture at least a portion of its $64 billion valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Industry officials who claim to have knowledge of the matter said FHFA is actively working with the GSE to resolve the situation. One former Fannie Mae official said it’s likely the agency will allow both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to claim deferred tax assets over several quarters.

The majority of financial institutions defending themselves against a massive litigation initiative by the Federal Housing Finance Agency on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for toxic mortgage-backed securities purchased by the GSEs launched a counteroffensive this week by urging a federal appeals court to intervene in their favor against the “unfair” trial judge. Fifteen banks, including JPMorgan Chase, UBS Americas, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America, filed a joint petition with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York complaining that U.S. District Judge Denise Cote has engaged in a “one-sided” approach designed to force a settlement rather than “foster fair and reasonable determination of the issues.”

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that a 2010 Federal Housing Finance Agency directive advising Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac not to purchase mortgages laden with certain first-priority lien obligations under the Property Assessed Clean Energy program falls within the FHFA’s purview as GSE conservator. A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit overturned a ruling last August by California Federal Judge Claudia Wilken that determined the FHFA was not acting as conservator but as regulator and had improperly exercised substantive regulatory oversight in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act when the agency halted GSE involvement with PACE programs.

The National Labor Relations Board announced earlier this month that it will not seek en banc rehearing in Noel Canning v. NLRB, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed that President Barack Obama’s Jan. 4, 2012, recess appointments of three members to the board were unconstitutional. “The board, in consultation with the Department of Justice, intends to file a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for review of that decision,” the NLRB said. The petition is due...

In a sign that fair lending enforcement may be about to flex its muscle in the auto finance sector, the CFPB last week issued a bulletin asserting the authority to hold indirect auto lenders accountable for illegal, discriminatory pricing markups, and providing guidance to such lenders within the bureau’s jurisdiction on how to appropriately handle fair lending risk. “Consumers should not have to pay more for a car loan simply based on their race,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. The bureau’s bulletin “clarifies...

The CFPB now has the lion’s share of the oversight of the consumer debt collection market. Under the “larger participant” rule recently adopted by the CFPB, any firm with more than $10 million in annual receipts from consumer debt collection activities is now subject to the bureau’s supervisory authority. “This authority extends to about 175 debt collectors, which accounts for over 60 percent of the industry’s annual receipts in the consumer debt collection market,” the bureau said in its annual report to Congress on the Fair...

A federal judge in Los Angeles last week denied a motion by Bank of America’s Countrywide Financial unit to dismiss securities fraud claims by the Federal Housing Finance Agency on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for toxic MBS purchased by the government-sponsored enterprises.The FHFA’s complaint alleges that Fannie and Freddie purchased approximately $26.6 billion in residential MBS that Countrywide sold from Aug. 30, 2005, to Jan. 23, 2008. The agency alleges negligent misrepresentations and fraud related to the offerings of Countrywide MBS.

The Internal Revenue Service is preparing to launch an industry-wide review of housing counseling agencies, including those approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as other tax-exempt entities that provide mortgage foreclosure assistance, compliance experts warned. In fact, the IRS has started looking at providers that have applied for tax-exempt status in recent months and has denied three organizations in February 2013 alone, according to attorneys with the Washington, DC, law firm Venable. Housing counseling agencies can use the issues raised in the “private letter” rulings as a ...