Both industry trade groups and consumer advocacy groups have called on the bureau to reconsider certain aspects of its draft strategic plan.

The bill would require consumers to attest “under penalty of perjury” that their submitted complaints to the CFPB are true.

There will be detrimental consequences for borrowers and mortgage investors if the CFPB goes through with changes suggested by President Trump, according to a recent analysis.

House moves bill with Section 1071 exemptions forward; MBA, AARMR launch AI survey; Enova’s bank application faces opposition.

The National Treasury Employees Union said the DC District Court should take up the review of the Trump administration’s revised layoff plan for the CFPB. However, the union said it opposes the administration’s 45-day timeline for the review.

With the Trump administration working under CRA requirements set in 1995, fair housing advocates asked states to step up and implement their own CRA laws.

As part of its ongoing “deregulatory agenda,” the CFPB said it is focused on reconsidering the Section 1071 and Section 1033 final rules and potentially pursuing a rulemaking under ECOA.

Adam Rust, director of financial services at the Consumer Federation of America, asked consumer advocates to continue fighting for fairness in the financial services industry.

A California district court upheld a plaintiff’s California Consumer Privacy Act claim against PHH Mortgage for sharing his personal information without his consent.

Industry trade groups representing banks asked the CFPB to reduce burdens associated with a survey tracking terms of credit card plans.