Lenders, home builders and affiliated settlement service companies are lobbying the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to preserve the ability of affiliated settlement service providers to do business with one another under the final ability-to-repay/qualified mortgage rule the agency is charged with writing. “We strongly support a competitive mortgage market where builders and lenders large and small, unaffiliated and affiliated, as well as other settlement service providers actively compete to provide sound mortgage products and ancillary settlement services to consumers,” said the Leading...

The mortgage industry told the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that the recent state attorneys general settlement contains a robust set of consumer protections that ought to be used as the framework for developing national servicing standards. However, industry representatives expressed concern that such an initiative could create additional barriers to entry to the servicing business. “First and foremost, the AG settlement will provide substantial relief to homeowners and will establish significant new homeowner protections for the future,” the Mortgage Bankers Association said in a recent...

Banks will receive some release from liability for loan originations in the $25 billion mortgage settlement involving the industry’s five largest servicers, state attorneys general and the federal government, according to experts participating in an Inside Mortgage Finance webinar this week. While the settlement is often described as “landmark,” industry experts note that major components were drawn from a hodgepodge of federal and state initiatives. The detailed servicing standards, for example, are a “synthesized cut-and-paste” from sources including Office of the Comptroller of the Currency...

The recent Servicing Resolution Agreements signed by the nation’s top five mortgage servicers with the federal government and state attorneys general may have been clear on the cost of their key provisions but it is the enormous hidden costs of compliance that could bite the financial institutions in the long run, according to compliance experts. Following the recent announcement of the national servicing settlement, it is impossible to put an accurate dollar amount on the myriad things servicers need to do in order to comply, but experts agree that staffing, training, technological upgrades...

A conservative, non-partisan public interest group has filed suit against the Federal Housing Finance Agency, claiming the FHFA has improperly denied the group’s request for documents relating to the Finance Agency’s decision to sue 17 financial institutions last fall on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over alleged misrepresentations of mortgage-backed securities.Last week, Judicial Watch filed its lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the FHFA denied the group’s Freedom of Information Act request for documents related to the agency’s litigation. The Finance Agency argued that as private companies, FOIA requests do not apply to Fannie and Freddie.

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks will now be prohibited from taking on mortgages “encumbered by certain types of transfer fee covenants and in certain related securities” under a final rule issued last week by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The FHFA’s final rule, published in the March 16 Federal Register, generally applies, with some exceptions, to private transfer fee covenants created on or after Feb. 8, 2011, the publication date of the Finance Agency’s proposed rule.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has announced its roadmap for managing its conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it moves toward its ultimate end of reducing GSE market share and building a new secondary mortgage market infrastructure. Two weeks ago, the FHFA rolled out its 2012 “conservatorship scorecard,” which provides more details about the Finance Agency’s revamped strategic plan that was announced last month.

Last week, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Judge Jed Rakoff of the District Court for the Southern District of New York erred when he blocked the $285 million agreement the Securities and Exchange Commission and Citigroup struck to settle a dispute over MBS that later turned toxic when the market tanked. Market observers think it likely means the settlement is back on track, and a good sign for the market, “with sanity and certainty prevailing,” as one put it. In U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., the district court this past November refused to approve a...

The Treasury Department this week finished winding down its holdings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac MBS, claiming a positive return of $25 billion for the U.S. taxpayers from a market stabilization initiative launched in the teeth of the 2008 financial market meltdown. Treasury’s holdings of MBS issued by the two government-sponsored enterprises peaked at $197.6 billion in December 2009. “These MBS purchases helped preserve access to mortgage credit during a period of unprecedented market stress,” the agency said. The Federal Reserve agency MBS investment program was far bigger, peaking at $1.12...

The feds aren’t done cracking down on mortgage servicers and before the smoke clears, more than a half dozen companies are going to be facing fines that have been pending since federal regulators announced their servicing consent decrees last April, an official from the Federal Reserve told members of Congress this week. Last month, the Fed announced it had assessed monetary sanctions totaling $766.5 million against Ally Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo for failing to appropriately oversee their subsidiaries’ mortgage loan servicing and foreclosure processing...