In an unusual legal development, the City of St. Paul, MN, late last week suddenly removed its challenge in a case before the Supreme Court of the United States that could have produced a definitive ruling on the disparate impact theory of lending discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. What’s unusual in Magner v. Gallagher is that the city believes it would have prevailed in the nation’s highest court – but opted to ask for dismissal because city leaders came to the conclusion that a victory could substantially undermine important civil rights enforcement in housing throughout the nation. The city expects to...

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is going all out to bolster FHA’s capital reserves with budgetary proposals to increase annual premiums beyond the 10-basis points hike authorized by Congress late last year. The proposed premium increases are expected to complement the $1 billion that Bank of America has agreed to pay to resolve claims against the bank and its subsidiary, Countrywide Financial Corp., for alleged underwriting and mortgage origination fraud. The BofA settlement, half of which is a penalty paid directly to the FHA, is part of a $25 billion agreement among 49 state...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is on course to spend nearly half a billion dollars in 2013, half of which is projected to be devoted to supervision and enforcement, according to the budget proposal released by the Obama administration this week. The CFPB breaks down its expenditures into three categories, the largest of which is devoted to supervision, enforcement, fair lending and equal opportunity (SEFLEO), with projected funding to exceed the other two categories combined. After spending approximately $60 million in 2011, the SEFLEO bucket is budgeted at $214 million for 2012 and $261...

A proposed rule by the Federal Housing Finance Agency to require Federal Home Loan Banks to verify a member’s Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rating, as well as to be responsible for overseeing members’ compliance with the FHFA’s first-time homebuyers standards, would be an unnecessary and unwelcome change, according to public commenters.Issued in November, the proposal would replace the current practice in which members submit to the Finance Agency the community support statement.Instead, FHLBanks would review a member’s CRA rating using publicly-available information from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council or from the member’s federal banking regulator.

Congress should consider changing the mandate of the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to address a “conflict of interest” that inhibits the Finance Agency’s supervision of the GSEs, a housing economist told senators this week.Testifying before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Columbia School of Business Professor Christopher Mayer said a significant problem with the ongoing operation of the GSEs has been the failure to adequately address operational conflicts.“The evidence suggests that the conflict of interest between the businesses of providing mortgage guarantees and managing a large retained portfolio of mortgages and [mortgage-backed securities] has led to obstacles to normal credit conditions,” said Mayer.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has made a number of minor but important changes to its existing Freedom of Information Act regulations.On Jan. 31, the Finance Agency published in the Federal Register updates to its FOIA regulations to include the FHFA Office of Inspector General. The FHFA-OIG, which came into existence in October 2010, did not exist when FHFA’s original FOIA regulations were issued in 2009.The FHFA final regulation lists the various revisions to the agency’s 2009 FOIA regulation, as well as describes what information is exempt from disclosure.

Industry insiders are cautiously expressing optimism about widespread reports that the Federal Housing Finance Agency is having second thoughts about implementing its proposed overhaul of mortgage servicing compensation in the face of massive lender pushback.Numerous published reports have fueled the industry’s expectation that the FHFA is working to tactfully back away from proposed alternatives for a government-sponsored enterprise compensation model intended to benefit servicers, consumers and investors.The Finance Agency’s September discussion paper set out two alternatives for changing the current 25 basis-point minimum fee compensation method for mortgage loan servicers. One alternative would reduce the minimum-servicing fee to as low as 12.5 bps payment with a 5 bps reserve fund, and the second alternative would institute a fee-for-service method whereby the loan servicer would be compensated with a flat fee per month for each performing loan they service.

A Federal judge in Chicago tabled for the moment the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s hopes of a speedy ruling in its favor of its lawsuit to exempt Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from the city’s new vacant building ordinance, although the judge appears open to hearing the FHFA’s jurisdictional argument.Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Joan Lefkow denied the FHFA’s request for summary judgment in its lawsuit against Chicago while she ordered the city to file its response to the Finance Agency’s litigation.Filed in December, the FHFA’s lawsuit on behalf of the two GSEs seeks to prevent the city from enforcing the ordinance which requires mortgagees to pay a $500 registration fee for vacant properties and requires monthly inspections of mortgage properties to determine if they are vacant.

The five large mortgage servicers that agreed to a $25 billion settlement with 49 state attorneys general this week have already established more than enough reserves to cover their costs, analysts say. Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Ally Financial agreed to pay $20.0 billion in financial relief to homeowners and $5.0 billion to federal and state governments, of which $1.5 billion will be used to compensate some borrowers who have gone through foreclosure. Both the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency levied separate monetary penalties...

One potential coup for the mortgage industry in the landmark multistate robosigning settlement announced this week is the detailed look at national servicing standards at a time when the states are racing to implement their separate foreclosure and servicing reforms. The terms for the $25 billion deal reached by 49 states, federal officials and the five major banks – Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Ally Financial – have yet to be released. However, one document that immediately made its way onto the settlement’s new website was an overview of the new servicing...