A lawyer by trade, Watt noted: “Unfortunately, legal constraints prevent me from saying much about this because we are in the period between the end of the comment period and the time we issue the final rule.”
“Had the proposal been implemented, it could have had a chilling effect on FHA lending, to the detriment of the borrowers served by the FHA program,” according to lawyers at K&L Gates.
Financial institutions will be required to provide much more data to monitor fair lending compliance and access to credit under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, thanks to a new, 800-page, final rule the CFPB issued last week. Under the new rule, lenders must provide more information about mortgage loan underwriting and pricing, such as an applicant’s debt-to-income ratio, the interest rate of the loan, and the discount points charged. “This information will enhance the ability to screen for possible fair lending problems, helping both institutions and regulators focus their attention on the riskiest areas where fair lending problems are most likely to exist,” said the CFPB. “This information will also help the bureau and other stakeholders monitor developments in specific ...
The mortgage lending industry had a less-than-enthusiastic greeting for another rulemaking from the CFPB that goes on for hundreds of pages. The initial reaction from the American Bankers Association was muted. Frank Keating, president and CEO, said his organization is pleased that the bureau extended the compliance date and excluded the collection of data on most commercial transactions, something the ABA advocated. “However, we continue to be concerned about the privacy of bank customers’ data and ensuring that their information is properly protected. We look forward to commenting on these important issues,” he added. “The rule also imposes significantly expanded data reporting and collection requirements, so we remain concerned about the appropriate balancing of costs and benefits in order to ...
The CFPB recently issued much-sought but quite limited guidance to the mortgage industry on marketing services agreements, emphasizing the legal and regulatory risks for lenders. “We are deeply concerned about how marketing services agreements are undermining important consumer protections against kickbacks,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Companies do not seem to be recognizing the extent of the risks posed by implementing and monitoring these agreements within the bounds of the law.” The guidance, in the form of a five-page bulletin, explains that, while marketing services agreements are usually framed as payments for advertising or promotional services, “in some cases the payments are actually disguised compensation for referrals. Any agreement that entails exchanging a thing of value for referrals of settlement ...
A cross-section of industry representatives and analysts were not very impressed with the long-sought guidance on marketing services agreements that the CFPB put out recently. Michael Barone, a director of legal and regulatory compliance at Lenders Compliance Group, a consulting firm in Long Beach, NY, said the guidance – which he characterized as very short and informal – “was an effort to get something out very quickly,” in response to all the congressional criticism that CFPB Director Richard Cordray received at the hands of critics on Capitol Hill. “It really does not have a lot of teeth at all,” he said of the bulletin. Further, the guidance doesn’t “tell us anything more than where we were an hour before this guidance came ...
A number of industry trade groups said that CFPB Director Richard Cordray’s determination earlier this year that PHH Corp.’s former mortgage reinsurance activities violated the anti-kickback provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act was wrong and ill-founded on multiple levels. Jointly submitting an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in PHH et al. vs. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the organizations argued that the director’s order cannot be reconciled with RESPA, the bureau’s governing regulations, or longstanding policy guidance. First, the directive contravenes the text, structure and purpose of RESPA Section 8(c)(2) by relegating it to “a mere rule of construction, rather than treating that provision as the exemption to liability that it ...
RSS