With the mortgage lending industry’s use of marketing services agreements under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act likely hanging in the balance, the CFPB detailed its anti-kickback legal arguments against PHH Corp. and its mortgage units in its “reply” brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, filed earlier this month. In PHH Corp., et al., v. CFPB, the first main argument the bureau made is that PHH violated RESPA Section 8(a) because it entered into agreements with mortgage insurers so that whenever an insurer received a referral from PHH, the insurer paid PHH a kickback in the form of premiums for mortgage reinsurance. “PHH thus committed a separate violation every time it accepted a kickback ...
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency informed lenders recently it will soon start examining banks for their compliance with the Truth in Lending Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Integrated Disclosure rule, and issued some updated guidance to help institutions get ready. In OCC Bulletin 2015-42, the agency said during initial examinations for compliance with the rule, OCC examiners will be evaluating a bank’s compliance management system and overall efforts to come into compliance, “recognizing the scope and scale of changes necessary for each bank to achieve effective compliance.”Further, the OCC said, “Examiners expect banks to make good faith efforts to comply with the rule’s requirements in a timely manner. Specifically, examiners are considering the bank’s ...
The CFPB continues to see a host of noncompliance issues with mortgage lenders – but some notable improvement on the servicing side of the industry too. According to the CFPB’s latest supervisory highlights report, the bureau cited a range of problems lenders are having originating mortgages. For instance, regulators saw evidence of failing to fully comply with the requirement that charges at settlement not exceed amounts on the good faith estimate by more than specified tolerances. Some lenders also are failing to fully comply with requirements for completion of HUD-1 settlement statements, to provide homeownership counseling disclosures, or to provide accurate loan servicing disclosure statements. Other lenders are not complying with consumer financial information privacy requirements, the report indicated. In other ...
The CFPB’s proposed plan to study overdraft protection services for ATM/debit cards suffers from a process that is “defective and opaque,” according to the American Bankers Association, which urged the bureau to re-submit its proposed plan with a draft survey. Back in September, the CFPB solicited public comment as it seeks authorization from the White House Office of Management and Budget to carry out a national online survey of 8,000 individuals as part of its review and analysis of ATM/debit card overdraft disclosure forms. “ABA fully supports the bureau’s interest in conducting a quantitative survey of consumers to understand their use of overdraft services, as well as on their comprehension and decision-making regarding overdraft disclosure forms,” said the trade group ...
The recent anti-arbitration announcement from the CFPB would create risks for consumer lenders and related asset-backed securities, according to a report from Moody’s Investors Service. Specifically, the bureau indicated it is contemplating instituting a ban on provisions in financial contracts that prohibit consumers from participating in class-action litigation. The agency is also considering whether to mandate that companies that include such arbitration clauses regularly submit to the CFPB information related to arbitration proceedings, possibly for release to the public. Such changes could end up driving more class-action litigation against lenders and servicers, a number of which play essential roles in the securitization process, analysts at Moody’s said. “The proposals, if adopted, would affect financial products including credit cards, automobile loans, ...
For the second time in four months, the CFPB has rejected a Freedom of Information Act request from the auto dealer industry to make public a number of leaked agency documents that are said to undermine the bureau’s assertions that it is not trying to regulate auto dealers. The CFPB’s latest rejection came in response to a FOIA request filed last month by the National Automobile Dealers Association, asking the CFPB to release internal documents leaked to the news media apparently acknowledging that the agency intended to regulate the auto finance market through enforcement action. Further, the documents are said to have revealed that the bureau eschewed evidence that its methods for estimating disparate impact in the auto finance sector ...
Industry recipients of a civil investigative demand (CID) from the CFPB may have been given a new way to cope, thanks to a recent decision from the District Court for the District of Columbia. In John Doe Company No. 1 v. CFPB, the target of a CFPB investigation brought an injunctive action against the agency seeking a temporary restraining order and a motion to seal the case. John Doe Company No. 1 asserted that sealing the case was justified on two grounds, the first of which is that bureau investigations are usually conducted confidentially. Further, sealing would protect the company from the harm that would result from the negative publicity if the CFPB’s ongoing investigation was made public. In coming ...
RSS