Industry trade groups, as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s regulator, are questioning the wisdom of Congress as lawmakers in both chambers have bills pending to hike the fees charged to guarantee GSE mortgages as a way to help offset the cost of extending the payroll tax cut through 2012.Both House and Senate versions of tax cut extension bills would add an additional 10 basis points to the guarantee fees charged by Fannie and Freddie through 2021. The increase would offset about $35.7 billion in costs, including $1.3 billion in the first year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.As Inside the GSEs went to press, the prospect of any tax cut extension was in doubt after the House rejected the bill calling for a two-month extension. Instead, House Republicans demanded immediate talks with the Senate on a year-long plan but the Senate ruled out further negotiations until the House passes the stop-gap measure.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris filed suit this week against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, taking up a notch her probe of the two GSEs’ mortgage lending and foreclosure practices.The lawsuits, filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco, seek to compel the companies to turn over documents the AG’s office had sought through a subpoena served to the two companies on Nov. 15.The Federal Housing Finance Agency directed Fannie and Freddie not to respond to the subpoenas.The subpoenas sought information about how Fannie and Freddie are handling thousands of foreclosed properties, as well as details about the GSEs’ mortgage-servicing and home-repossession practices.

The official watchdog of the Federal Housing Finance Agency found a sympathetic audience in senators last week as the head of the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General sounded a now-familiar refrain – that the Finance Agency is falling short in its oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.Testifying before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, FHFA Inspector General Steve Linick said the OIG has identified “deficiencies” in Finance Agency operations which appear to reflect two “significant and related trends.” First, the FHFA has relied too much on the determinations of the two GSEs without independently testing and validating those determinations, testified Linick. “Second, FHFA was not proactive in oversight and enforcement and accordingly, resource allocations may have affected its ability to oversee the GSEs and enforce its directives,” said Linick. “Both trends have emerged in a number of our reports.”

The Federal Housing Finance Agency last week filed suit against the city of Chicago claiming that its attempt to enforce a recently amended vacant buildings ordinance on properties owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “impermissibly encroaches” on the FHFA’s role as sole regulator of the GSEs.Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the FHFA’s lawsuit on behalf of the two GSEs seeks to prevent the city from enforcing the ordinance which requires mortgagees to pay a $500 registration fee for vacant properties and requires monthly inspections of mortgage properties to determine if they are vacant. "The ordinance would impose on the enterprises the responsibilities, but not the benefits of ownership of vacant property on which they hold the mortgage,” said the FHFA in a statement. “The ordinance would create risks and liabilities for the enterprises at a time when they are already supported by taxpayers, including those in the city of Chicago.”

The Federal Housing Finance Agency should refrain from implementing a proposal that would overhaul the mortgage servicing compensation system as it has failed to make a “compelling case” as to why it is necessary to change a system that has “worked well for decades,” according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.In a comment letter sent to the Finance Agency earlier this month, MBA President and CEO David Stevens said the FHFA’s proposed changes would dramatically alter residential servicing, origination and secondary market operations, not necessarily for the better.“The current servicer compensation model is still the best approach and making radical changes, like the proposed ‘fee-for-service,’ will have dramatic impacts not just on originators, servicers and investors but also on borrowers in both the costs they pay to get a mortgage and the support they receive from their servicers,” said Stevens.

California. In XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Perry, No. 11-2078, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. cannot intervene in in a litigation dispute between former IndyMac Bancorp executives and their insurers. The court ruled the FDIC did not meet the standard for intervention as a matter of right, or the standard for permissive intervention. Connecticut. In RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. Anna M. Miller et al., the Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that RMS Residential Properties, LLC, with an assignment from Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., had standing to foreclose after the borrower defaulted, and that MERS was a valid mortgagee at the origination of the loan, as the nominee for the original lender. The court rejected the claim of the defendant, who argued that that MERS, as third party, could not be named as a mortgagee because it was not the original lender or the party secured by the mortgage. The court also rejected the defendant’s request to declare the MERS mortgage to be void because MERS was not the owner of the debt.

There’s been a notable changing of the guard among attorneys in the mortgage banking practices at the law firms of Patton Boggs, Ballard Spahr and Dykema. Partners Richard Andreano, John Socknat and Michael Waldron and associate Reid Herlihy left Patton Boggs recently with upwards of 100 clients and signed on with the newly created Mortgage Banking Group at Ballard Spahr. The new unit is part of Ballard Spahr’s larger effort to build up its Washington, DC, office. Meanwhile, Dykema augmented its regulatory presence by bringing on board former Patton Boggs senior lawyers Heather Hutchings and Haydn Richards to its Financial Services Regulatory and Compliance practice.

The recent change in the FHA’s maximum loan limits would have relatively limited impact for current borrowers trying to refinance, according to analysts. FHA loans insured prior to Oct. 1, 2011, were already grandfathered in for streamlined refinancing regardless of loan size, said analysts with J.P. Morgan Securities. In addition, the analysts said they do not expect many conventional jumbo-to-FHA refinances in this market segment because the mortgage insurance premiums make FHA loans less attractive. Last month, President Obama signed an appropriations bill into law, reinstating the pre-Oct. 1 formula for calculating the “temporary” loan limits for high-cost areas, which is ... [With one chart]

Expenses for maintaining foreclosed properties before their transfer or conveyance are much higher for FHA than for Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, according to a recent Government Accountability Office report. The report, which focuses on the growing number of vacant properties and the costs and challenges of maintaining them, found that FHA’s pre-conveyance reimbursements to servicers are higher than the government-sponsored enterprises’ pre-foreclosure reimbursements. In 2010, the FHA reimbursed servicers about $1,982 compared to the GSEs’ $235 per property for maintenance-related expenses prior to ...

Private mortgage insurers would play a strategic role under a new Senate proposal for winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and privatizing guarantees on high-quality mortgage securitizations. Introduced by Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-GA, the Mortgage Finance Act of 2011 would create a new regulatory framework for securitizing “qualified residential mortgages” and an alternative form of guarantee provided by a new Mortgage Finance Agency. Under Isakson’s bill, the two government-sponsored enterprises would be placed in a run-off mode by the Federal Housing Finance Agency 18 months from the date of enactment. They would be required to ...