According to their financial disclosures and company officials, both GSEs saw a sharp decline in the average guarantee fee they charged on new MBS issued during the fourth quarter…
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac observers are scratching their heads about “minimum return on equity” requirements that the Federal Housing Finance Agency has imposed, somewhat mysteriously, on the two government-sponsored enterprises.
As predicted, per the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the GSEs’ fourth-quarter earnings took a big hit with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac posting losses of $6.5 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively. This is a far cry from their combined net income of $7.7 billion in the third quarter. But this likely one-time event was prompted by the GSEs having to reduce the value of their deferred tax assets by $15.3 billion after the tax act became law in December 2017. As a result, Fannie will need a $3.7 billion draw from Treasury and Freddie will have to request a $312 million draw.
This week, 127 mortgage banking executives attached their names to an open letter to members of Congress, urging federally elected politicians not to cede the work of housing-finance reform to the White House and the institutions it controls.The correspondence asks lawmakers to back draft legislation that creates a new “guarantor-based” system that builds on the current infrastructure created and maintained by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.The executives, members of the Mortgage Bankers Association, favor improving the system by having “two or more” guarantors. The group believes a guarantor-based system – as opposed to an “issuer-based” system – is the best way to meet the nation’s housing-finance needs.
RSS