The Supreme Court of the United States will settle a multi-district circuit court conflict that will likely determine the ability of the mortgage lending industry to determine on its own what to charge borrowers at the point of origination. In deciding earlier this month to accept Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc., the high court will confront the question of whether a plaintiff must demonstrate an unearned fee for a real estate settlement service was divided between two or more persons in order to establish that a violation of Section 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act occurred.

Rep. Jeff Miller, R-FL, chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, reportedly has instructed his staff to start looking into allegations that a number of mortgage lending institutions charged illegal fees to veterans who refinanced their homes. Committee staff members reportedly met with Department of Veterans Affairs officials to discuss the allegations, which were made public earlier this month by a federal court in Atlanta. “I will reserve judgment on the appropriate next course of action, to include the potential for a full Committee hearing, after having the opportunity to review the results of the staff investigation,” Miller said in a letter to Rep. Bruce Braley of Iowa, the ranking Democrat on the committee’s subcommittee on economic opportunity.

Alabama. Last week, in Reed v. Chase Home Finance LLC, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama rejected a mortgage lender defendant's motion to dismiss or amend a putative class action alleging a violation of the Truth in Lending Act. Plaintiff Reed alleged defendant Chase Home Finance failed to provide the borrower with notice that it was a new creditor as required by TILA Section 1641(g) when it was assigned an ownership interest in plaintiff's mortgage and note. The defendant argued that plaintiff’s position that the note was assigned to defendant, explicitly pled in the complaint, has to be “supported by factual material rendering the assertion plausible.”

A regulatory scare from the Securities and Exchange Commission may end up being much less of a challenge for real estate investment trusts than the stiff competition they face from bank portfolios, according to experts at the ABS East conference sponsored by Information Management Network this week in Miami Beach, FL. In September, the SEC rattled the mortgage REIT sector – which has struggled to gain a foothold in the nonconforming mortgage market – by launching a formal fact-finding mission on maintaining the exemption REITs enjoy from the Investment Company Act. ...

Several large banks and mortgage companies are accused of cheating military veterans and taxpayers out of millions of dollars by hiding illegal fees in VA refinance transactions and of deliberately misleading the government to obtain guarantees for the refinanced loans. Three law firms – Butler Wooten & Fryhofer and Wilbanks & Bridges in Atlanta and Phillips & Cohen in Washington, D.C. – have teamed up to pursue the “qui tam” or whistleblower lawsuit on behalf of two mortgage brokers and the U.S. government. The brokers, Victor Bibby and Brian Donnelly, brought the lawsuit under the False Claims Act, a federal law that goes back to the Civil War when it was used to ...

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has suspended a former president of Lend America from doing any business with the agency following his admission that he engaged in a mortgage fraud scheme against the FHA in 2009. Michael Primeau, the former executive, had pled guilty to charges he directed employees of Lend America, a former FHA-approved lender, to divert mortgage funds intended to pay off borrowers’ first mortgages at refinance closings in order to pay company-operating expenses. Two years ago, HUD and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York filed a civil complaint against Ideal Mortgage Bankers, doing business as Lend America, in federal district court. The complaint sought ...

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to review a dispute over closing fees in a move that may resolve a potentially entrenched circuit court conflict over the scope of the Real Estate Settlement Practices Act prohibition against unearned fees. At issue is RESPA Section 8(b), which provides that “[n]o person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split or percentage of any charge made or received for the rendering of a real estate settlement service in connection with a transaction involving a federally related mortgage loan other than for services actually performed.” As the U.S. government...

The head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency says his agency expects to complete a review of potential improvements to the Home Affordable Refinance Program “by the end of this month” but based on what they heard during a private meeting last week, dissatisfied House Democrats say they expect the results won’t nearly be good enough. FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco met last week with a group of 17 congressmen, led by Reps. Dennis Cardoza, D-CA, and Elijah Cummings, D-MD, to discuss ways to reinvigorate the underwhelming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac refinance program. In what’s been described as a...

A scathing criticism of the way the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Freddie Mac handled a $1.35 billion settlement with Bank of America could cause the regulator and the government-sponsored enterprises to tighten repurchase enforcement – and consequently inflate the buyback problem, according to litigation experts. Speaking on a recent webinar hosted by Inside Mortgage Finance, experts said a report by the FHFA’s Office of the Inspector General which found flaws in the BofA settlement approval process, could push the GSEs and their regulator to lean harder on major lenders to repurchase “bad loans.” This, in turn, could...

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems has been at the center of two significant developments recently that bring more legal clarity to the mortgage industry’s foreclosure practices – and could portend a quicker resolution of an enormous number of cases currently tied up in foreclosure. Early this week, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Gomes v. Countrywide, declining to reconsider lower court rulings in the case, essentially affirming MERS’ authority to foreclose in California in the process. “The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied,” the high court said in its certiorari summary dispositions. “The chief justice [John Roberts] took...