Two significant issues related to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act have received fresh attention at the Supreme Court, which is expected to make landmark rulings next year. The U.S. Solicitor General and a group of state attorneys general filed briefs in Freeman v. Quicken Loans, a case in which the high court will likely determine the ability of the mortgage lending industry to decide what to charge borrowers at the point of origination. RESPA Section 8(b) provides that “no person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split or percentage of...

The Federal Housing Finance Agency filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the City of Chicago this week to keep it from enforcing its recently amended “Vacant Buildings Ordinance” against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The move may provide servicers a way to fight the ordinance without bringing upon themselves any enforcement action from the city while the litigation is pending, according to some observers. “The City of Chicago is interfering unlawfully with FHFA’s federally mandated oversight and exercise of discretion, as conservator...

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley sued five major lenders late last week for allegedly illegal foreclosure practices. One of the firms, GMAC Mortgage, responded by pulling out of Massachusetts lending, prompting Coakley to request a Congressional investigation of GMAC. This week, the AGs of California and Nevada followed suit with a joint announcement of a dual mortgage fraud probe. “We have two clear goals with this lawsuit,” Coakley said. “One is to provide for real accountability for the roles the banks have played in unlawful and illegal foreclosures and second...

Patton Boggs, a large Washington DC-based law and lobbying firm, has seen an en masse exodus of its mortgage banking lawyers. Ballard Spahr created a Mortgage Banking Group for the three Patton Boggs partners and an associate, while Dykema welcomed two senior attorneys to its growing Financial Services Regulatory and Compliance practice. Patton Boggs did not return calls for comment regarding the future of its own mortgage practice, and the departed lawyers would not speculate as to the future of their former firm. Partners Richard Andreano, John Socknat and Michael Waldron...

In a move that further complicates the 50-state settlement discussions between the mortgage servicing industry and state attorneys generals, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, D, has sued a handful of top mortgage lending banks for allegedly pursuing illegal foreclosures and “deceptive loan servicing.”The targets of Coakley’s actions are Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, Citi and GMAC, as well as Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.“The single most important thing we can do to return to a healthy economy is to address this foreclosure crisis,” Coakley said. “Our suit alleges that the banks have charted a destructive path by cutting corners and rushing to foreclose on homeowners without following the rule of law. Our action today seeks real accountability for the banks’ illegal behavior and real relief for homeowners.”

A Federal judge in California rejected a servicer’s motion to dismiss a putative class action that accused the servicer of wrongly rejecting a borrower's mortgage modification application and of improperly starting foreclosure proceedings.In Gaudin v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc., the plaintiff argued that a trial modification plan provided to her by the lender represented a binding contract that required Saxon to evaluate the plaintiff under the Home Affordable Modification Program, and to provide a permanent loan mod, provided all conditions of the trial plan were satisfied.In requesting a dismissal, Saxon argued that the trial plan only required it to evaluate the borrower’s eligibility for a modification, and did not require Saxon to offer a modification.

Massachusetts. In Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of Nebraska, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts late last week granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Aurora, as holder of the plaintiff’s mortgage by assignment from Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., and as the servicer of the loan, could exercise the statutory power of sale and foreclose under Massachusetts laws. U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young held MERS may serve as the mortgagee as the lender’s nominee, MERS has the authority and right, and may assign mortgages in which it is named as the mortgagee, and such mortgages are valid and enforceable. Further, the judge concluded that, “The court holds that there was no flaw in this process. Under Massachusetts law, MERS lawfully held the legal title to Culhane’s mortgage in trust first for Preferred and subsequently for Deutsche.”

In a blow to ratings agencies, a federal court in New Mexico has ruled that the First Amendment does not necessarily protect ratings services from lawsuits filed by disgruntled MBS investors. Judge James Browning ruled that the characteristics of MBS issued by Thornburg Mortgage and the way the ratings were disseminated may preempt free speech protection. The suit dates back to the spring of 2009, when plaintiffs that include the Genesee County Employees’ Retirement System, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund and the Maryland-National Capital Park &...

Bank of America has settled two major securities fraud claims with various pensions funds and other investors in connection with Countrywide-related stocks and non-agency MBS. It also faces the prospect of a challenge by two state attorneys general, whose requests to intervene in another multi-billion dollar MBS case were granted by a New York federal court this week. The bank agreed to an undisclosed settlement amount with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the Government of Guam Retirement Fund and 14 other large pension and mutual fund investors. Accounting firm...

The chief of enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission took issue with a U.S. District Court judge’s rejection this week of the agency’s proposed $285 million settlement with Citigroup over a collateralized debt obligation backed by MBS that went sour, and defended the deal as the best available course of action, given the restrictions under current law. Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, responded to a ruling announced early this week by U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan in which the judge rejected the multi-million-dollar...