Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley sued five major lenders late last week for allegedly illegal foreclosure practices. One of the firms, GMAC Mortgage, responded by pulling out of Massachusetts lending, prompting Coakley to request a Congressional investigation of GMAC. This week, the AGs of California and Nevada followed suit with a joint announcement of a dual mortgage fraud probe. “We have two clear goals with this lawsuit,” Coakley said. “One is to provide for real accountability for the roles the banks have played in unlawful and illegal foreclosures and second...

Patton Boggs, a large Washington DC-based law and lobbying firm, has seen an en masse exodus of its mortgage banking lawyers. Ballard Spahr created a Mortgage Banking Group for the three Patton Boggs partners and an associate, while Dykema welcomed two senior attorneys to its growing Financial Services Regulatory and Compliance practice. Patton Boggs did not return calls for comment regarding the future of its own mortgage practice, and the departed lawyers would not speculate as to the future of their former firm. Partners Richard Andreano, John Socknat and Michael Waldron...

In a move that further complicates the 50-state settlement discussions between the mortgage servicing industry and state attorneys generals, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, D, has sued a handful of top mortgage lending banks for allegedly pursuing illegal foreclosures and “deceptive loan servicing.”The targets of Coakley’s actions are Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, Citi and GMAC, as well as Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.“The single most important thing we can do to return to a healthy economy is to address this foreclosure crisis,” Coakley said. “Our suit alleges that the banks have charted a destructive path by cutting corners and rushing to foreclose on homeowners without following the rule of law. Our action today seeks real accountability for the banks’ illegal behavior and real relief for homeowners.”

A Federal judge in California rejected a servicer’s motion to dismiss a putative class action that accused the servicer of wrongly rejecting a borrower's mortgage modification application and of improperly starting foreclosure proceedings.In Gaudin v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc., the plaintiff argued that a trial modification plan provided to her by the lender represented a binding contract that required Saxon to evaluate the plaintiff under the Home Affordable Modification Program, and to provide a permanent loan mod, provided all conditions of the trial plan were satisfied.In requesting a dismissal, Saxon argued that the trial plan only required it to evaluate the borrower’s eligibility for a modification, and did not require Saxon to offer a modification.

Massachusetts. In Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of Nebraska, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts late last week granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Aurora, as holder of the plaintiff’s mortgage by assignment from Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., and as the servicer of the loan, could exercise the statutory power of sale and foreclose under Massachusetts laws. U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young held MERS may serve as the mortgagee as the lender’s nominee, MERS has the authority and right, and may assign mortgages in which it is named as the mortgagee, and such mortgages are valid and enforceable. Further, the judge concluded that, “The court holds that there was no flaw in this process. Under Massachusetts law, MERS lawfully held the legal title to Culhane’s mortgage in trust first for Preferred and subsequently for Deutsche.”

In a blow to ratings agencies, a federal court in New Mexico has ruled that the First Amendment does not necessarily protect ratings services from lawsuits filed by disgruntled MBS investors. Judge James Browning ruled that the characteristics of MBS issued by Thornburg Mortgage and the way the ratings were disseminated may preempt free speech protection. The suit dates back to the spring of 2009, when plaintiffs that include the Genesee County Employees’ Retirement System, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund and the Maryland-National Capital Park &...

Bank of America has settled two major securities fraud claims with various pensions funds and other investors in connection with Countrywide-related stocks and non-agency MBS. It also faces the prospect of a challenge by two state attorneys general, whose requests to intervene in another multi-billion dollar MBS case were granted by a New York federal court this week. The bank agreed to an undisclosed settlement amount with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the Government of Guam Retirement Fund and 14 other large pension and mutual fund investors. Accounting firm...

The chief of enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission took issue with a U.S. District Court judge’s rejection this week of the agency’s proposed $285 million settlement with Citigroup over a collateralized debt obligation backed by MBS that went sour, and defended the deal as the best available course of action, given the restrictions under current law. Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, responded to a ruling announced early this week by U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan in which the judge rejected the multi-million-dollar...

Saxon Mortgage prevailed in a closely watched case decided by the Arizona State Supreme Court in November. The 5-0 ruling determined that the recording of an assignment is not necessary to enforce a foreclosure under Arizona law. The decision in Vasquez v. Saxon Mortgage could have a wide-ranging impact, according to legal analysts. Jean Braucher, a professor of law at the University of Arizona, said the court essentially approved of servicers’ “sloppy procedures,” ...

Settlements regarding non-agency mortgage-backed securities are starting to increase as industry analysts suggest that the agreements limit the future liability faced by issuers. Bank of America and the Royal Bank of Scotland recently reached separate non-agency MBS settlements. At the end of October, BofA quietly settled with investors – including the Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi – in 18 non-agency securities issued by Merrill Lynch. The settlement price was not disclosed but was reportedly $315.0 million. ...