The National Credit Union Administration this week announced settlement agreements with Deutsche Bank Securities and Citigroup stemming from their roles as underwriters that sold non-agency MBS to credit unions that eventually failed. Deutsche Bank is paying the bigger amount, $145.0 million, while Citi’s payment will be $20.5 million. Neither firm admitted fault as part of the settlement. The proceeds from the settlements will be used to offset assessments that the NCUA has levied against credit unions to pay the cost of cleaning up the failures of...

The National Credit Union Administration this week reached settlements with two underwriters of non-agency mortgage-backed securities. The settlements also have implications for non-agency MBS issuers and underwriters facing lawsuits from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Deutsche Bank Securities agreed to pay the NCUA $145.0 million to reduce losses associated with five failed credit unions. Citigroup also agreed to pay the NCUA $20.5 million to settle similar charges. The settlements included terms stating that the issuers did not admit fault. NCUA Board Chairman Debbie Matz warned that the settlements are...

A federal judge in Houston ruled that Allied Home Mortgage Corp. can continue to originate and underwrite FHA-insured loans, putting into question the validity of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s suspension of the lender’s FHA privileges. U.S. District Court Judge Melinda Harmon, in a 22-page decision issued filed on Nov. 15, said the “potential destruction” of Allied’s business outweighs any harm the government would suffer before the issues can be litigated.

The Obama administration this week proposed a new rule that would establish uniform procedures for the resolution of disparate impact allegations under the Fair Housing Act at a time when the whole legal underpinnings of disparate impact are slated for review by the U. S. Supreme Court. In a proposed rule that has been in preparation for months, the Department of Housing and Urban Development argued that it has the authority to apply the disparate impact theory of discrimination in the context of fair housing, including fair lending charges. The purpose of the proposed rule, HUD says, is to clear up uncertainty about...

The U.S. Supreme Court will determine whether disparate impact claims can be applied to the Fair Housing Act and lending discrimination cases by reviewing a Minnesota case involving rental housing. Although many fair lending cases based on disparate impact have been brought and settled over the years, the standard has not been universally interpreted by federal appeals courts. In Magner v. Gallagher, private landlords sued the city of St. Paul, MN, for enforcing its housing code, leading to claims by the landlords that shutting down their properties made it too difficult for minority renters to find...

Life isn’t getting any easier for mortgage lending giant Wells Fargo when it comes to litigation. The top-ranked mortgage lender through the first nine months of the year took a couple of high-profile shots in just the last two weeks or so. Last week, Illinois’s Cook County Judge Carolyn Quinn gave the green light to a suit filed by state Attorney General Lisa Madigan against Wells, which accuses the lender of offering financial incentives to employees to put minority borrowers who qualified for prime mortgages into subprime loans during the 2005-2007 time frame. Illinois has a similar axe to grind against Countrywide Financial Corp., which was acquired by Bank of America Corp. three years ago.

Despite its fairly impressive success rate in fending off hostile litigation, MERSCorp and its Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems remain popular targets. This time around, it’s Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden filing suit in Delaware Chancery Court against them, alleging repeated violations of the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. “Since at least the 1600s, real property rights have been a cornerstone of our society,” said AG Biden. “MERS has raised serious questions about who owns what in America. A man or woman’s home is not just his or her largest investment, it’s their castle. Rules matter. A homeowner has the obligation to pay the mortgage on time, and lenders must follow the rules if they are seeking to take away someone’s house through foreclosure. The honor system won’t work.”

The nation’s five largest mortgage servicing companies now face a tab of $25 billion to bring to a conclusion the long-running negotiations with the state attorneys general over industry foreclosure practices, according to published reports of the latest behind-the-scenes developments. The deal with the big five servicers – Ally Financial Inc., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. – is now said to include $5 billion in cash penalties, along with the requirement to produce $3 billion in mortgage refinances. Other aspects of the settlement are said to include principal reductions and other forms of aids to struggling homeowners. The top servicers would be released from certain claims having to do with loan servicing and origination, according to the reports – but to what extent exactly remains unclear. And there would be no release from claims related to mortgage securitization.

The servicing settlement being negotiated between state attorneys general and major banks will likely require principal reduction via loan modifications and possibly refinances. Principal reduction, however, will likely only be required for certain mortgages held in bank portfolios. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has refused to allow principal reduction on mortgages serviced for the government-sponsored enterprises. Non-agency mortgage-backed security investors, meanwhile, have been more accepting of principal reduction of late but the vast majority of such mod activity is already concentrated on portfolio loans. ...

Federal prosecutors this week sued an FHA lender to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in paid claims in connection with mortgage loans originated through branches that were not approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. A lawsuit filed by the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan district court this week alleged that Allied Home Mortgage Corp., President and CEO Jim Hodge and Executive Vice President Jeanne Stell engaged in reckless mortgage lending, flouted FHA mortgage insurance requirements and repeatedly lied about compliance. Such actions, the suit alleged, subsequently led to...