The FHA is easing the waiting period and eligibility criteria for certain borrowers with previous bankruptcies, foreclosures, deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure and short sales who would like to purchase a home again. According to Mortgagee Letter 2013-26, borrowers who may be otherwise ineligible for an FHA-insured mortgage due to the agency’s required waiting period may now be able to apply for a new purchase mortgage loan because of the shortened waiting period and if they meet the criteria. This latest initiative to help borrowers whose credit had been impaired by the financial crisis is called ...

Lenders must correct erroneous disclosures concerning mortgage insurance premiums (MIP) before submitting loans for FHA insurance, according to new FHA guidance. In an update to Mortgagee Letter 2013-04, FHA Commissioner Carol Galante said some mortgages originated since the termination of the MIP cancellation policy earlier this year still contain incorrect MIP-related disclosures. Under the revised policy, MIPs are no longer cancellable when the current loan-to-value ratio reaches 78 percent. Rather, MIP payments must be made over the entire life of the FHA-insured loan. The change is aimed at increasing ...

Plans by officials of the city of Richmond, CA, to make a controversial use of eminent domain to seize underwater mortgages, rework their terms and stiff MBS investors for the resulting losses suffered two major blows in recent days as two federal regulatory agencies that play a critical role in the nation’s mortgage finance system intensified their opposition. This week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, in response to a joint inquiry by three California Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee, said it cannot guarantee that any mortgage seized through eminent domain would be approved for an FHA-insured refinance – a central pillar in the eminent domain proposal developed by Mortgage Resolution Partners. “Pending legal developments and possible further execution of the plans in question, HUD does not know...

Fitch Ratings recently updated its criteria for estimating losses on residential MBS transactions, introducing three new variables that influence default expectations, including the origination channel. Fitch said it has determined that loans originated through a direct retail channel have a lower default risk than those originated through brokers or correspondents. To account for this risk, the rating agency is now assigning a higher default probability to loans originated through non-retail channels. This newly added variable is applied...

Although additional defendants sued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency are expected to sooner or later cut deals to settle fraud charges over the sale of non-agency MBS to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, banks with larger exposures may calculate that their best bet is to let it play out in court, according to a new report by Fitch Ratings. Fitch noted that the FHFA’s announcement last month that UBS Americas will pay some $885 million to settle claims concerning MBS that UBS sold to the two government-sponsored enterprises is a significant event as other defendants crunch the numbers before deciding whether to proceed with a lengthy and expensive trial or to cut their losses. “Although not necessarily setting a formal precedent, the high settlement costs to UBS relative to the outstanding portfolio amount could lead...

The Federal Housing Finance Agency is ready, willing and able to use its big stick as regulator of the GSEs to play hardball against municipalities that move forward with proposed efforts to seize underwater mortgages via local government eminent domain powers, say industry observers. One year ago nearly to the day after the FHFA warned “action might be necessary” to protect the GSEs, the Finance Agency released a legal memorandum outlining a number of steps it could take in response to an eminent domain action to restructure mortgages. The FHFA reiterated its “significant concerns” as conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as regulator of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks, that widespread seizures of the loans and their subsequent refinancing “presents a clear threat to the safety and sound operations of the GSEs.”

The Federal Housing Finance Agency may pursue a fraud lawsuit against Ally Financial despite the bankruptcy status of Ally’s Residential Capital mortgage unit, a Manhattan federal judge ruled this week. U.S. District Court Judge Denise Cote denied Ally’s request to stay the FHFA’s litigation, a typical motion by bankrupt debtors to defer litigation as they seek to reorganize. In 2011, the FHFA filed 18 lawsuits alleging that Ally and other large financial institutions misrepresented the quality of non-agency mortgage-backed securities sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the 2008 financial crisis.

Last week, SunTrust and PNC separately disclosed they are being investigated by agencies of the federal government over some of their mortgage practices as the drive continues to bring enforcement actions in the wake of the financial crisis. For SunTrust, the U.S. government is probing whether it properly processed borrowers’ loan-modification applications under the Home Affordable Modification Program. SunTrust Mortgage “has been cooperating...

The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission filed similar lawsuits this week against Bank of America regarding an $855.67 million non-agency jumbo MBS issued in January 2008. The lawsuits claim that BofA failed to disclose key facts regarding one of the last jumbo deals to be issued before the securitization market essentially closed in 2008. BofA counters that the securities were sold to sophisticated investors that had “ample access” to the underlying data. BofA was the issuer of the security in question – Banc of America Mortgage 2008-A Trust – as well as the originator, servicer, sponsor and depositor, and affiliated entities managed the transaction. The regulators allege...

One of the last non-agency jumbo mortgage-backed securities issued before the securitization market effectively closed in 2008 is the subject of similar lawsuits by the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Bank of America issued the $855.7 million security in January 2008, as well as originated and serviced the loans included in the MBS. The regulators cite internal reports from BofA as well as email communications among employees to allege that BofA provided inadequate ...