Fannie Mae will no longer purchase or securitize mortgages on properties encumbered by certain transfer fee covenants that were created on or after Feb. 8, 2011, under a new policy that goes live next week. The policy, which takes effect July 16, follows a rule finalized by the Federal Housing Finance Agency in March that prohibits Fannie, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks from taking on mortgages encumbered by certain types of transfer fee covenants and related securities. In light of the new policy, mortgages on affected properties must be purchased by Fannie as whole loans no later than July 13, 2012, or must be delivered by July 13 into MBS pools with issue dates before July 1, 2012.
Fannie Mae executives and staffers were at the front of the line of Countrywide Home Loans sophisticated influence peddling operation that showered not just GSE employees but Washington insiders with deeply discounted mortgage loans in order to curry favor, according to a newly released House committee report. The 136-page report completes a three-year investigation by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee of Countrywides so-called Friends of Angelo program, named after CEO Angelo Mozillo, which ran for a dozen years until the lender was acquired by Bank of America in 2008.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency is extending the comment period for its proposed rule that would exclude Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from purchasing loans subject to a Property Assessed Clean Energy lien. On June 15, the FHFAs notice of proposed rulemaking was published for public comment in compliance with a federal court order. The proposed rule would direct the GSEs to cease purchasing any mortgage that is subject to first-lien PACE obligation and refuse to consent to the imposition of a first-lien PACE obligation on any mortgage.
The sooner the Federal Housing Finance Agency acts to clarify Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs positions on what triggers a loan repurchase request, the better it will be for lenders and for the recovery of the housing finance system, industry groups say. Over the past three years, the two GSEs have asked for more than $80 billion in flawed loan repurchases from lenders, prompting an overabundance of underwriting caution, according to Fitch Ratings. Reduced uncertainty around the reasons as well as the timing and remedies available for repurchase may help ease lenders concerns and improve credit availability, said Fitch. Establishing clear and detailed repurchase standards, developing reporting and enforcement mechanisms and creating clear timelines that govern the process would be positive steps and would be welcome by lenders and investors alike.
Mortgage securities investors have as much at risk as lenders from the emerging ability-to-repay consumer protection standard because borrowers will be able to challenge compliance with far fewer time restrictions, according to the American Securitization Forum. In a comment letter to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the ASF urged the agency to set objective and clear standards for qualified mortgages which will satisfy the ability-to-repay underwriting requirement imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act and a legal safe harbor. Otherwise, the resulting significant risk and costs of potential litigation will constrain investors from purchasing...
Two of the three biggest barriers to a return of the non-agency mortgage sector the premium capture cash reserve account and the qualified mortgage definition are embedded in the Dodd-Frank Act, industry officials say. And the third is whats not in the controversial law: any substantive reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The biggest challenge to reducing the governments domination of the mortgage market is the lack of direction on the government-sponsored enterprises, said Tom Deutsch, executive director of the American Securitization Forum, during a hearing this week.
Twenty-five states are thinking about revising their foreclosure laws to make it harder for lenders to seize properties, out of concern that inefficient loan modifications are leading to unnecessary foreclosures, the Wall Street Journal reported last week. That would prove costly for borrowers in the future, according to Mortgage Bankers Association CEO David Stevens. Should all 50 states decide to go down their own path, lenders are going to have multiple processes, each with their own little nuances, and every single penny of that cost will be borne by tomorrow's borrowers...
House of Representatives.Hearing on Impact of Dodd-Frank. The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises plans a hearing Tuesday, July 10, on the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on customers, credit and job creators. The witness list includes the American Securitization Forum and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.House of Representatives.Hearing on Impact of Dodd-Frank on Financial Services Competition...
California. Former IndyMac CEO Michael Perry and CFO Scott Keys agreed to a $6.5 million settlement to resolve a class-action lawsuit by shareholders who accused the executives of concealing how badly the mortgage lenders financial position had deteriorated when they were buying company stock from March 1, 2007, to May 12, 2008. A shareholders motion for preliminary approval submitted last week said the pending settlement is a reasonable resolution of the dispute and ensures that shareholders will at least make some financial recovery. Florida. In Fuller v. MERS, U.S. District...
California is about to become the first state to enact into law a large portion of the national mortgage servicing settlement that state and federal government officials negotiated this year with the nations top five banks and apply it to all lenders. The state legislature passed the Homeowner Bill of Rights last week (AB 278/SB 900). The Democrat-controlled state Assembly approved the bill on a 53-25 vote, with the Senate endorsing the measure 25-13. The legislation will force large lenders to provide a single point of contact, eliminate dual tracking and impose significant civil...