The Supreme Court of the United States last week sided with Quicken Loans while unanimously rejecting the legal arguments of two federal agencies in affirming a lower court’s determination that a plaintiff must prove a settlement fee was split by two or more persons in order to successfully stake a claim under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The relevant portion of RESPA at issue in Freeman et al. v. Quicken Loans Inc. is the provision that “[n]o person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split, or percentage of any charge made or received for the rendering of a...