Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – during two different periods last year – spent nearly $20 billion buying roughly 85,000 loans despite clear warnings or questions about the appraisals, according to a new audit from the Inspector General of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. As part of its report, the FHFA-OIG has made 14 recommendations to FHFA regarding the matter, calling on the regulator to ensure the GSEs make better use of appraisal information generated by a uniform collateral data portal the agency told the two to develop in 2010.
Despite new public pronouncements by lawmakers and administration officials that housing finance reform remains a “top priority,” industry observers warn there is little chance of legislation clearing Congress, ensuring a status quo that leaves the uber-profitable Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in place and pumping money into the Treasury. Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee Chairman Tim Johnson, D-SD, and Ranking Member Mike Crapo, R-ID, broke a long public silence by reiterating their intention to push bipartisan housing finance reform in a statement on Wednesday.
The mortgage market is just one month into the world of qualified mortgage lending under the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s ability-to-repay rule. But behind the scenes, investors, legal advisors and technology vendors are working to get ready to enter the non-QM space. “I can tell you, at least from the investor side, from the number of investors that I talk to – and some of these are cradle-to-grave guys that have originating arms in their organizations, or maybe correspondent networks for which they’re buying – they are building infrastructure and capability to process and buy these non-QM type loans,” said Dave Hurt, vice president at CoreLogic. “So there is genuine interest and significant enough confidence that there will be a market that they’re making investments both in technology and infrastructure to do that.” And it’s not...
The new judge presiding over Bank of America’s $8.5 billion settlement with MBS investors this week countermanded, for the moment, last week’s approval of the deal by her predecessor, giving a major opponent of the agreement another chance to argue against it. New York State Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla agreed to delay approval of the deal until at least Feb. 19 to hear American International Group’s appeal. Last week, Justice Barbara Kapnick approved the settlement agreement, except for loan modification claims, as one of her last acts before she took a promotion to the state’s Appellate Division. BofA agreed...
Also, the CFPB is considering requiring more underwriting and pricing information, such as the interest rate, total origination charges, and discount points.
Among other issues, the GAO found that for three of the servicers, their denial rates were significantly higher for Hispanics than for the comparison population of non-Hispanic whites.
The Federal Reserve’s move to reduce its purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities may eventually change the relative costs and benefits of financing new production through Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. “We’re in an environment where I think banks are going to get interested in at least the more attractive credit risks and holding those in portfolio,” said Mark Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at the libertarian Cato Institute in Washington, DC. “So, to me, the most important question going forward over the next two years for the MBS market is how much of this [new production] is going to make its way into MBS and how much will be held on balance sheets as whole loans.” Calabria predicted...
Graham Williams, CEO of Mortgage Resolution Partners, a firm that has achieved notoriety in the mortgage industry for trying to use eminent domain to seize underwater loans, is moving on. But that doesn’t mean the concept of municipalities using the legal strategy is going away. “I’m transitioning out of the CEO job,” Williams told Inside Mortgage Finance. “The company will continue on.” Asked whether a CEO search is underway, he said he didn’t know. As Inside Mortgage Finance went to press this week, there were...
The Treasury Department’s surprise move in the summer of 2012 to rewrite the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements it had with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was an “unlawful” action that could have a far-reaching impact well beyond the shareholders of the two government-sponsored enterprises, according to an attorney representing shareholders. Speaking Wednesday at a forum sponsored by Ralph Nader’s Shareholder Rights advocacy group, attorney Ted Olson of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher said Treasury’s Third Amendment to the PSPA was a calculated effort by the Obama administration to ensure that GSE stockholders got nothing, according to internal Treasury documents they obtained. The amendment replaced the quarterly GSE dividend payment with a net-worth sweep of all company profits. Perry Capital, represented by Olson, is...
RSS