The mortgage industry’s continued use of marketing services agreements and other affiliated business arrangements hangs in the balance in a long-running dispute between PHH Corp. and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will be the subject of oral arguments April 12, 2016, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. “The PHH appeal is one of the most important Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act opinions to be decided by the courts in decades,” legal expert Phillip Schulman told Inside Mortgage Finance this week. “It will determine whether Section 8(c)(2) of the act merely clarifies the Section 8(a) anti-kickback provisions of the statute, as CFPB Director Richard Cordray claims, or whether it creates a safe harbor that exempts payments from a RESPA violation if those payments are for goods provided or services rendered, as the plain language of the act and several previous circuit courts have held.” Further, “This appeal will have...
A battle on the legislative or even legal front may be brewing that challenges the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s recent decision to exclude certain types of insurance companies from membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The biggest impact of the final rule would be to force a number of real estate investment trusts that have formed captives to gain access to the FHLBanks to give up low-cost FHLBank advances. “The impact on mortgage liquidity and credit access should be...
The turmoil in financial markets around the world is fueling a flight to safety on the part of investors into U.S. dollar-denominated assets, helping to keep mortgage rates in the U.S. housing market lower than they otherwise would be. But how long that will continue is anyone’s guess. “The recent volatility in worldwide financial markets caused Treasury rates to decline, so we’ve seen that being picked up in mortgage rates,” Danielle Hale, managing director of housing statistics for the National Association of Realtors, told Inside Mortgage Finance. Mike Fratantoni, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association, said...
In an interview with IMFnews, NAIHP president Marc Savitt said the new forms are confusing and "the three-day waiting period is useless and unnecessary.”
Although the CFPB recently issued a “clarifying” letter on errors tied to the TRID integrated disclosure rule, deep concerns remain among originators that fund non-agency product for sale into the secondary market. Moreover, according to interviews conducted by Inside Mortgage Finance, an affiliated publication, some nonbank lenders are seeing noticeable increases in origination costs because loans are taking longer to close and therefore remain on warehouse lines for an extended period of time. Because nonbanks fund almost all of their production using warehouse credit, the implication boils down to this: already squeezed profit margins are going to shrink. Industry efforts to comply with the new disclosures, which merge requirements of the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement ...
The recent letter from CFPB Director Richard Cordray to the Mortgage Bankers Association clarifying certain aspects of the bureau’s integrated disclosure rule has some important take-aways – and certain limitations – the industry should be mindful of, according to some top industry attorneys. In a recent online blog posting, attorneys Donald Lampe and Leonard Chanin of Morrison & Foerster LLP identified a handful of key take-aways for mortgage market participants related to the TRID rule. First, “If mortgage loan originators and others involved in the origination, financing and sales of mortgage loans are not familiar with the benefits of [specific] Know Before You Owe disclosure cure provisions, now is the time to assess them,” the attorneys began. They then noted that Cordray’s ...
RSS