Mortgage market observers say they are seeing a gradually building struggle by the Federal Housing Finance Agency to maintain its precarious balance between the FHFA’s congressionally-mandated roles as conservator to the GSEs and – indirectly – regulator of 65 percent of the mortgage market. Industry interests, meanwhile, continue to call for greater “transparency” surrounding Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-related decision making. Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the FHFA was created to succeed the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight as regulator to Fannie and Freddie as well as the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks.

The official watchdog of the Federal Housing Finance Agency has pointedly suggested that the GSE regulator direct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine whether or by how much the two companies were swindled out of billions of dollars as a result of banks’ alleged manipulation of a key interest rate and then determine how to recoup those losses, in court if necessary. A recent unpublished memo by the FHFA’s Office of Inspector General urged the Finance Agency to prepare to file suit against the banks involved in setting the London Interbank Offered Rate after an analysis of the GSEs’ published financial statements and publicly available historical interest data concluded that Fannie and Freddie may have suffered more than $3 billion in losses due to LIBOR manipulation.

Staff at the Securities and Exchange Commission this week recommended that the agency do more research before making a decision on how to implement a controversial provision in the Dodd-Frank Act involving random assignments of credit ratings in structured finance. Sen. Al Franken, D-MN, was the major proponent of a requirement that the SEC study the feasibility of creating a government body that would pick which credit rating agency would evaluate new non-agency MBS, non-mortgage ABS, commercial MBS and other structured finance transactions. The provision, Sec. 15e(w) of the Dodd-Frank Act, essentially requires the SEC to implement the new system unless the agency determines that an alternative system would better serve the public interest and protect investors. Although some investors and rating services support the Sec. 15e(w) concept, most securitization market participants oppose...

The agency residential MBS market expanded for the third consecutive quarter during the three months ending in September, according to a new Inside MBS & ABS analysis. A total of $5.39 trillion of single-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae were outstanding as of the end of the third quarter of 2012. That was up by a scant 0.2 percent from the previous period, although it was still 0.4 percent below the level at the same time in 2011. Both Ginnie (2.1 percent) and Fannie (0.6 percent) posted...[Includes two data charts]

Investors in non-agency MBS have numerous concerns about a loan modification program proposed by the Obama administration, according to Tom Deutsch, executive director of the American Securitization Forum. The so-called Market Rate Modification program would target borrowers with negative equity on a mortgage in a non-agency MBS. “For the many significantly underwater borrowers that would not default on their mortgage loans, the MRM proposal would ultimately represent a transfer of wealth from the pension fund and 401(k) investors who lent the mortgage principal through residential MBS to borrowers that have not demonstrated any material life changes that would impair their ability to make their monthly mortgage payments,” Deutsch said in a letter this week to the Treasury Department. He noted...

A recession resulting from the federal government taking the U.S. economy over the fiscal cliff would leave Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac vulnerable to higher credit losses and make the two government-sponsored enterprises unprofitable again, according to Moody’s Investors Service. Moody’s this week warned that Washington’s failure to reach a tax and spending agreement would also force the GSEs to ride out the shockwaves of potential financial market disruptions on their derivatives trades. “In our current central economic scenario, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are...

Investors in non-agency mortgage-backed securities are pushing back against a loan modification program proposed by the Obama administration that would target underwater loans backing their investments. “Quite simply, investors have already been significantly harmed by the poor performance of many of the mortgage loans in non-agency MBS, and the Market Rate Modification proposal would only increase the severity of losses suffered by institutional investors,” Tom Deutsch ...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is considering expanding the size and scope of the exemption on its pending final rule regarding servicing practices, according to agency officials. The CFPB also downplayed concerns that the servicing rule will expand loss-mitigation options beyond those approved by mortgage investors. During a webinar this week hosted by Inside Mortgage Finance, Mitchell Hochberg, regulatory counsel at the CFPB, said the agency is “very heavily” thinking about ...

Damage from Hurricane Sandy will have a negligible impact on mortgages in outstanding non-agency mortgage-backed securities, according to a new analysis by Opera Solutions. The servicing analytics provider said 45 non-agency MBS deals with $19.6 billion in outstanding balance have mortgages with exposure to significant damage from the storm and the likely affected balance is $6.0 billion. “Based on a detailed analysis of each portion of affected ZIP codes, the ultimate exposure is much lower ... [Includes four briefs]

The CFPB has proposed allowing banks, credit unions and other financial services companies to test new consumer disclosures on a case-by-case basis. The bureau would have to approve of the disclosure programs ahead of time. Under the proposal, the CFPB would exempt certain qualifying individual companies for a limited time from existing federal disclosure laws so they can research and test “informative, cost-effective disclosures.” The participating companies would then share their results with the agency so it...