Rep. Maxine Waters, the ranking minority member of the House Financial Services Committee, believes that now is "precisely the time to think about how we can reshape the secondary mortgage market."
It appears that well known economist Mark Zandi is indeed a candidate to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency. But will the White House actually nominate him?
Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase continue to post strong residential finance profits, but there is a growing worry that the "mortgage party" may be drawing to a close.
The unrelenting campaign by liberal Democrats and progressive activists to depose the Federal Housing Finance Agencys acting director could backfire by making him politically untouchable, while the badgering directed at the Obama administration threatens to alienate the very man they seek to convince to act in their favor, according to industry observers. According to a memo released late this week that was prepared by New York Attorney General Eric Schneidermans legal team, President Obama has the power to replace FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco without congressional approval. We conclude that the president has the authority to remove the acting director at will, and there is a strong argument that he has the authority to designate a new acting director, although the answer to that question is less certain, noted Schneidermans memo.
Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs recent, unambiguous return to profitability will diminish an already waning urgency among Capitol Hill lawmakers to proceed with legislative GSE reform as the companies profits flow into the U.S. Treasury by the billions, industry experts warn. Fannie announced last week that the GSE expects to remain profitable for the foreseeable future after posting record-shattering quarterly and yearly earnings for the period ending Dec. 31, 2012. In the wake of Fannies announcement, the White House this week said that from January 2013 to the end of 2023 the two GSEs could send $183.3 billion to the Treasury.
UBS Americas failed in its bid to shut down a lawsuit brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency in connection with non-agency mortgage-backed securities purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while in another case three former Freddie executives lost their own bid to dismiss a Securities and Exchange Commission securities fraud case against them. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals last week upheld a lower courts ruling that denied UBS motion to dismiss the FHFAs suit as time barred. In the summer of 2011, the FHFA filed 18 lawsuits in Manhattan federal court against UBS and other big banks on behalf of the GSEs, alleging violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933 for approximately $200 billion in non-agency MBS sold to Fannie and Freddie.
In recent months, the Securities and Exchange Commission has looked into Regulation AB compliance issues regarding non-agency MBS issuance from 2010 and 2011 by Redwood Trust. The SEC questioned Redwood and others involved in the issuance regarding disclosures of servicing practices. An official at Redwood said the issue largely relates to the complicated nature of Redwoods deals. In particular, issuance from Redwood often involves multiple servicers, each of which can be subject to Reg AB disclosure requirements. According to correspondence published this week by Redwood, the SEC first queried...