Two insurance industry trade groups recently filed suit in federal district court to contest the Department of Housing and Urban Developments final rule formalizing its disparate impact interpretation of the Fair Housing Act, which asserts that housing policies and practices can be deemed discriminatory not only through their intent but also by their effects. The rule, issued in early February, formally establishes the three-part burden-shifting test for determining when a practice with a discriminatory effect violates the Fair Housing Act. The American Insurance Association and the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, whose members sell homeowners insurance, challenged...
The FHA is considering whether to establish a maximum limit for unacceptable loans as well as a process to make post-endorsement reviews more efficient.
As reported by Inside MBS & ABS earlier in the year, the two GSEs are sitting on large unrealized gains on some of their MBS holdings, including non-agency.
In recently issued guidance, the VA said reduction of principal in connection with a loan modification may produce a higher expected return for a servicer than termination of the loan.
The suit was filed in December 2012 on behalf of hundreds of thousands of investors who bought stock in an offering by Fannie in May 2008, four months before the GSE was taken over by the government.