ReadyCap Commercial LLC, a startup based in Irvine, CA, issued its first loan approval a few days ago, and hopes to issue a commercial MBS by the fall. The company’s forte is what it calls “low balance” commercial mortgages, including multifamily, office, industrial and retail properties. Its loan size menu ranges from $500,000 to $5 million, company CEO Steve Skolnik told Inside MBS & ABS. Skolnik, who until last June headed commercial services at Aurora Bank FSB, is...

A temporary exemption for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgages is among the plethora of provisions contained within the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s long-awaited “qualified mortgage” rule issued last week. Even so, credit unions fear onerous GSE buyback requirements may be an unintended consequence of the new rule.Called for by the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB’s QM rule lists the characteristics of a qualified mortgage, or one that regulators will presume will be within a borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

Last week’s $10 billion settlement between Fannie Mae and Bank of America over outstanding and potential repurchase claims is at least a truce in the bitter battle between the GSE and the bank that has simmered since the housing bubble burst. But the jury is still out as to how much business the two companies will do again going forward. Under the agreement, BofA will pay Fannie $3.55 billion cash and spend $6.75 billion to buy back some 30,000 loans sold by Countrywide Financial to the GSE. The “comprehensive solution” between the firms covers current and future repurchase obligations related to loans with an outstanding balance of $297 billion as of Nov. 30, 2012, that were originated and sold directly to Fannie from 2000 through 2008. The bank will also pay Fannie $1.3 billion in “compensatory fee obligations” for taking too long to address foreclosures.

With roughly $900 billion of mortgage servicing rights changing hands since October (or about to), and more on the way, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be busy in the months ahead approving the transfer of MSRs.Much of the MSR product being sold by Bank of America in its recent deal with Nationstar Mortgage and Walter Investment Management Corp. is tied to loans guaranteed by Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie Mae.Servicing advisors who’ve worked with the GSEs note that their approval on a servicing sale is hardly a routine matter, especially if the product has high delinquencies, which is the case with some of the BofA receivables.

It’s no secret that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are back in the black when it comes to earnings, but in the quarters ahead the two are likely to perform even better as delinquencies and foreclosures continue to wane, and they move to recapture some of their massive loss reserves. But another factor could bolster their earnings as well: large legal settlements with the nation’s megabanks, which will go straight to their bottom line, according to an analysis done by Inside The GSEs. As part of Fannie’s buyback settlement with Bank of America (see related story on page 1), Fannie will receive some $3.6 billion in cash from the bank, plus BofA is repurchasing almost $7 billion in legacy loans.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac combined did more business in single-family mortgage-backed securities issuance in 2012 than in any year since 2003, with a growing share of their business coming from small and mid-sized lenders, according to an Inside The GSEs analysis. The two GSEs pumped out a staggering $1.266 trillion in new single-family MBS in 2012, a 48.1 percent increase over their total production in 2011. It marked the biggest annual output by Fannie and Freddie since the all-time record of $1.912 trillion nine years earlier.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency should review the concerns of industry trade groups about Fannie Mae’s plans to reduce the cost of lender “force-placed insurance” and then facilitate a “collaborative resolution” that’s open and transparent, industry groups contend. In a letter to the FHFA earlier this month, the American Bankers Association warned that Fannie’s March 2012 request for proposal inviting insurance companies to compete for the GSEs lender-placed insurance business directly as a way to ensure a significant reduction in insurance costs is rife with unintended consequences to the industry. “The proposal, if adopted, effectively would allow Fannie Mae to pick winners and losers among insurers, would be potentially inconsistent with state insurance requirements and would dramatically alter existing servicing operations, contracts and costs,” noted the ABA. “Such a proposed major reform of the mortgage servicing market should be considered in the sunshine.”

Over the past few weeks mortgage consultants have been discussing a potentially lucrative “request for proposal” issued several months ago that requires outside vendors to aid the Federal Housing Finance Agency in carrying out its “Strategic Plan” for taking the GSEs to the next stage in their evolution. But according to these consultants, interviewed by Inside The GSEs, the fate of this RFP has gone dark with the agency declining to discuss the contract or anything tied to it. An agency spokeswoman told IGSEs that not all agency RFPs are public. A check by IGSEs found that the regulator/conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac posted just one RFP last year, a project that requires education and training services for what’s called an “executive leadership training” program. The reason the strategic plan RFP has created some buzz in the industry is that it may involve asking a vendor how it might go about merging Fannie and Freddie. However, a copy of the RFP in question – obtained by IGSEs – mentions nothing about a merger of the two, and is worded so generally that it might entail just about any duties.

Analysts at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods noted in a recent report they expect both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to sell their real estate-owned properties “more meaningfully” if the GSEs can do so at levels “that are in line with current carrying values on the companies’ balance sheets.” At the end of the third quarter, Fannie held approximately 107,000 REO properties, worth an estimated $16.1 billion, assuming a purchase price of $150,000 per property. Freddie held some 51,000 REOs, equivalent to $7.6 billion assuming the same purchase price. KBW observed that there is room for improvement in how Fannie and Freddie move their REOs. “We believe that the GSEs will be unwilling for political reasons to take meaningful upfront losses to sell REO properties, even if it makes longer-term sense from an economic perspective,” said KBW.

With the official opening of the 113th Congress and the Obama administration’s second term to commence next week, the two key congressional committees overseeing mortgage and housing issues are reorganizing their membership rolls. But it remains to be seen whether lawmakers will be any more successful at advancing legislative GSE reform than during the previous two-year session. As expected, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-TX, has assumed the gavel of the House Financial Services Committee, replacing the term-limited former chairman Spencer Bachus, R-AL, who will remain on the committee as chairman emeritus. Rep. Gary Miller, R-CA, will serve as vice chairman of the committee, while Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-GA, will serve in the newly created position of committee whip.