The Federal Housing Finance Agency should “immediately withdraw” its proposal to impose additional, upfront guaranty fees on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgages in states that have unusually slow foreclosure timelines because it unfairly penalizes homeowners with higher costs for forces beyond their control, according to Connecticut’s congressional delegation. The Nutmeg State’s five congressmen and two senators dispatched a letter to the Finance Agency this week urging the FHFA to scrap its proposal issued in September targeting five states – Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and New York – for an additional, one-shot guaranty fee of between 15 and 30 basis points in 2013.

Democrat-sponsored, White House-approved legislation in the Senate to expand the Home Affordable Refinance Program has made the short list of bills to be considered during the post-election, lame-duck session of the 112th Congress. However, industry insiders say its final passage remains a tall order and the proposed HARP 3.0’s ultimate effectiveness is an open question.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each emerged from the third quarter of 2012 with a healthy profit, reporting a combined $4.74 billion in net income, a 41.7 percent decline from the second quarter but still well enough into the black to forgo taxpayer assistance to stay solvent. Fannie’s third quarter net income of $1.81 billion compared to a net loss of $5.1 billion in the same quarter a year ago but much more in line with the $2.72 billion it earned during the first quarter of 2012.

Speculation abounds across Capitol Hill and within mortgage industry circles about how long the “temporary” head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency will remain at his post following the post-election shake out. However, it remains to be seen whether President Obama, flush from re-election, will seek a replacement for FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco, either by nominating a permanent agency director to the Senate or by the more politically problematic recess appointment.

In the wake of last week’s election, two congressional committees key to mortgage and housing issues face significant reorganization while the pending fiscal crisis will cause execution of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac policy to remain on the backburner before lawmakers begin to reexamine GSE reform in earnest.The hard-fought electoral contest resulted in the status quo with Democrats in control of the White House and Senate, while Republicans retain their hold on the House. The House Financial Services Committee was poised for a leadership change no matter which political party prevailed with current chairman Spencer Bachus, R-AL, term-limited by House Republican Conference rules.

Look for the 113th Congress and to a lesser extent a second-term Obama administration to become more engaged in seeking a resolution to Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s future role in the mortgage market, although implementation of such a solution remains years away, say industry observers. In the short term, following a hard-fought 2012 election that left the balance of power and the political party makeup unchanged, official Washington will be primarily focused on averting the looming “fiscal cliff” of tax hikes and automatic spending cuts.

Refinancing of underwater and nearly submerged Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgages continued to spur business at the government-sponsored enterprises during the third quarter. During the third quarter of 2012, the two GSEs securitized a total of $66.91 billion of refinance mortgages with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 85 percent, a proxy for business originated under the Home Affordable Refinance Program. That was up 13.3 percent from the second quarter, according to an Inside MBS & ABS analysis of loan-level securitization data. Official HARP data are reported...[Includes two data charts]

Legislation drafted by Senate Democrats to expand the Home Affordable Refinance Program has made the short list of items to be considered during the lame-duck session of the 112th Congress, insiders say, but industry analysts see only marginal impact if the bill becomes law. The Responsible Homeowner Refinancing Act, S. 3522, sponsored by Senate Democrats Robert Menendez (NJ) and Barbara Boxer (CA), would provide equal access to streamlined refinancing under HARP, waive loan-to-value ratio requirements and prohibit the government-sponsored enterprises from charging upfront fees to refinance any loan they guaranty. A legislative staffer said...

The mortgage lending industry won a couple of key legal challenges recently, including an unusual claim brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. In Cabrera v. Countrywide Financial, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently dismissed, without prejudice, most of the complaint brought by two borrowers who accused the mortgage lender of engaging in fraudulent loan practices in violation of the RICO Act. In July 2007, Manuel Cabrera received...

Although mortgage market watchers cautiously expect President Obama and the lame-duck session of the 112th Congress to come up with at least a stop-gap deal to avoid the looming “fiscal cliff” at year’s end, building uncertainty among homeowners and potential borrowers as to whether important mortgage tax deductions will exist in 2013 threatens to thwart housing’s fragile recovery. Unless Congress and the president create and sign new legislation to change existing law before Jan. 1, 2013, taxpayers are poised to be hit with a massive combination of expiring tax breaks, tax hikes and deep, automatic federal spending cuts. A report last week by the Congressional Budget Office concluded that a failure to avoid the cliff would push the economy back into recession with the unemployment rate shooting up to 9.1 percent by next fall. Fitch Ratings warns...