Investors that are active in the market for non-QMs can’t seem to get enough of the loans or MBS. Meanwhile, large firms continue to avoid the sector due to concerns about liabilities and the lack of uniformity.

Redwood’s mortgage aggregation activity is increasing as banks apparently can’t handle all of the new volume tied to a decline in interest rates.

Despite regulatory talk about increasing efforts to help the non-agency market compete with the GSEs, the volume of noncore loans sold to Fannie and Freddie increased in 2019, led by mortgages with DTIs greater than 43%. (Includes data chart.)

MFA Financial sharply boosted its acquisitions of non-QMs in the fourth quarter. It has investments in five lenders and plans to issue MBS.

OptionWide is a relatively new non-QM lender while DoubleLine has close to $150 billion in assets under management.

CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger says the relatively small size of the non-qualified-mortgage market is one of the reasons the bureau plans to change QM standards.

Certain non-QM lenders’ underwriting tactics might not meet the CFPB’s ability-to-repay rule, according to Moody’s. It suggested tighter standards for bank statement mortgages and loans to the self-employed.

Annaly Capital Management and Ellington Financial are both generating double-digit returns from aggregating mortgages and issuing non-agency MBS. The firms plan to increase their activity in the sector.

Issuance of non-agency MBS backed by prime mortgages offers better returns than aggregating non-QMs, according to officials at Chimera Investment.

Presale reports for 13 non-agency MBS were published in the past two weeks as issuers sought to get deals into the market ahead of the Structured Finance Association’s annual conference.