Two FHA lenders in Texas have agreed to pay a total of $469,419 in civil money penalties to resolve government allegations they charged bogus fees to borrowers to inflate the purchase amount of newly built manufactured housing. Among 11 alleged violations of FHA rules, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Mortgagee Review Board accused American Home Free Mortgage of Prosper, TX, of artificially increasing mortgage costs by an average of $12,000 per loan through improper fees. The fees were paid allegedly to a company owned and operated by AHFM’s sales manager. In addition, HUD alleged there were multiple violations of quality and annual certification requirements. As part of the settlement agreement, without admitting to any fault or liability, AHFM agreed to pay a $169,419 fine and to the permanent withdrawal of its FHA approval. In June 2014, the MRB also heard a ...

The FHA will not issue a new case number for any FHA-to-FHA refinance if the current mortgage has a repair or rehabilitation escrow account in FHA Connection. The change, which is one of several updates to FHA Single Family Policy Handbook 4000.1, applies only to FHA streamline refis. It aims to ensure that escrow funds of the mortgage being refinanced are properly applied as well as conform to system requirements. The updated sections become effective on Sept. 14, 2015. Another change clarifies that the payoff statement for the mortgage being refinanced is the only document required when calculating the maximum mortgage amount for simple refi transactions. In addition, guidance for loan-to-value limits for cash-out refis has been updated to clarify that the 85 percent LTV restriction applies only to cash-out refis. HUD also noted that appraisers have flexibility in regards to when inspections should ...

The Office of Inspector General for the CFPB has found that the bureau has moved to secure the Data Team Complaint Database, which supports the CFPB’s Consumer Response System (CRS) through which it handles consumer complaints. However, there are several control deficiencies that need to be remedied. “Overall, we found that the CFPB has taken steps to secure the DT Complaint Database in accordance with the Federal Information Security Management Act and the agency’s information security policies and procedures,” the report began. For example, the CFPB has deployed network-level firewalls and intrusion detection systems for the DT Complaint Database. “However, we identified several control deficiencies related to configuration management, access control, and audit logging and review,” the report added. “Specifically, ...

Consumer complaints about their student loan debt obligations rose slightly at the six-month mark, up 4.8 percent versus the previous year, according to a new analysis by Inside the CFPB. Month over month, gripes were down 4.0 percent. There was a good bit of variation in the numbers, company to company, during both time periods. But there was also a good bit of consistency within individual companies, with six of the top 10 rising or falling according to both metrics. For instance, top-ranked Navient saw consumer criticisms fall 6.8 percent quarter over quarter and 14.8 percent at the mid-year point compared with last year. Meanwhile, at second-ranked Genesis Lending, consumer complaints spiked 29.9 percent QOQ and skyrocketed more than 1,000 ...

M&T Bank is in talks with the federal government to resolve an investigation of a pre-crisis sale of FHA-insured and conforming mortgages to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that resulted in losses for the government-sponsored enterprises. The New York-based bank disclosed the settlement discussion in a second-quarter filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is cooperating with the investigation. The Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Inspector General are investigating whether M&T Bank complied with FHA’s underwriting guidelines as well as with guidelines for selling loans to Fannie and Freddie. It is unclear how much the FHA paid out in loss claims in this case but investigators said that, based upon their review of a sample of FHA loans for which a claim was paid, “some of the loans do not meet underwriting guidelines.” M&T Bank could be ...

A growing number of issuers are engaging in servicing transfers prematurely or making changes to their servicing platforms, causing problems for Ginnie Mae’s monthly pool-level and loan-level reporting. A Ginnie Mae issuer “transfers servicing” when it shifts in-house servicing to a subservicer, moves servicing from one subservicer to another, or relocates servicing in-house. Effective servicing as well as accurate and timely reporting are critical to Ginnie’s mortgage-backed securities program, the company said in recently issued guidance on servicing transfers. The new policy guidance would ensure that issuers have the capacity and oversight controls at all times to meet their obligations under the Ginnie Mae MBS program. Currently, issuers are required to obtain Ginnie’s approval before engaging in any servicing transfer with a subservicer or from one subservicer to another. Effective immediately, any issuer that wishes to ...

A California federal district court’s recent decision to reject fair housing claims related to FHA loans brought by the City of Los Angeles against Wells Fargo relied heavily on the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on disparate impact, according to legal experts. Specifically, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment for Wells Fargo in a Fair Housing Act case brought by the City of L.A. The suit alleged that the bank’s mortgage lending practices had a disparate impact on minority borrowers, which resulted in a disparate number of foreclosures in minority areas. Wells Fargo was accused of reverse redlining since at least 2004 by imposing different terms or conditions on minority borrowers. The suit further alleged that Wells Fargo originated eight types of “predatory” home loans targeted to minorities. These loans include “high-cost” loans, subprime loans, interest-only loans, ...

A Miami FHA lender and two of his associates plead guilty to a mortgage fraud scheme that cost the FHA approximately $64 million in losses. Hector Hernandez, owner of Great Country Mortgage Bankers and a real estate developer, and his business partner Aleida Fontao each pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Olga Hernandez, an underwriter for Great Country, confessed to falsifying information in borrowers’ loan applications to make them appear qualified. According to the DOJ, Great Country was a direct endorsement lender that made loans to first-time homebuyers and borrowers with imperfect credit and low credit cores. Hernandez and Fontao admitted to pressuring their loan officers to approve and close loans based on fraudulent income and employment information. Borrower credit histories were altered to make them look good. The senior underwriter admitted to providing false information to her co-workers and endorsing borrowers’ applications despite knowing that they did not qualify for the loans.

The complaints that consumers filed with the CFPB about various aspects of their mortgages generally rose in the second quarter, as the mortgage market churned out new originations at elevated levels, a new analysis by Inside the CFPB found. Total consumer gripes rose 7.5 percent from the first quarter of 2015 to the second, the latest data from the bureau’s consumer complaint database show. The increase was largely driven by a surge of criticisms about the mortgage loan application and origination process, which climbed 11.8 percent during the period. Grumbling about loan modifications also increased during the period ending June 30, up 5.7 percent, a much higher rate of increase than the recent upward tick seen in default rates. Grievances ...

The CFPB recently launched the first in a new series of monthly reports to highlight key trends from consumer complaints submitted to the bureau, including data on company performance, complaint volume, state and local information, and product trends. The first installment in the series focuses on debt-collection complaints and complaints from consumers in Milwaukee. The bureau said it expects companies to respond to complaints within 15 days and to describe the steps they have taken or plan to take to resolve the complaint. “The CFPB expects companies to close all but the most complicated complaints within 60 days,” it said. “Complaints inform the bureau’s work and help to identify issues in the market, which feed into the bureau’s supervision and ...