A week after filing suit against a handful of top lenders, including Ally Financial and its mortgage subsidiary, GMAC Mortgage, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has asked the leadership of two key Congressional panels to investigate alleged mortgage-related misconduct by Ally via GMAC Mortgage. In this particular case, Coakley has some unusual leverage: Uncle Sam owns nearly three-quarters of Ally Financial as per a $17 billion investment made in 2008 under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. “In light of Ally’s alleged deceptive and illegal actions against homeowners in Massachusetts and across the country, I respectfully request that your committees investigate Ally’s serious misconduct and consider what actions the federal government can take to ensure that Ally adheres to the law,” Coakley said in a letter to Sen. Tim Johnson, D-SD, chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, and Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-AL, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

California. In XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Perry, No. 11-2078, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. cannot intervene in in a litigation dispute between former IndyMac Bancorp executives and their insurers. The court ruled the FDIC did not meet the standard for intervention as a matter of right, or the standard for permissive intervention. Connecticut. In RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. Anna M. Miller et al., the Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that RMS Residential Properties, LLC, with an assignment from Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., had standing to foreclose after the borrower defaulted, and that MERS was a valid mortgagee at the origination of the loan, as the nominee for the original lender. The court rejected the claim of the defendant, who argued that that MERS, as third party, could not be named as a mortgagee because it was not the original lender or the party secured by the mortgage. The court also rejected the defendant’s request to declare the MERS mortgage to be void because MERS was not the owner of the debt.

There’s been a notable changing of the guard among attorneys in the mortgage banking practices at the law firms of Patton Boggs, Ballard Spahr and Dykema. Partners Richard Andreano, John Socknat and Michael Waldron and associate Reid Herlihy left Patton Boggs recently with upwards of 100 clients and signed on with the newly created Mortgage Banking Group at Ballard Spahr. The new unit is part of Ballard Spahr’s larger effort to build up its Washington, DC, office. Meanwhile, Dykema augmented its regulatory presence by bringing on board former Patton Boggs senior lawyers Heather Hutchings and Haydn Richards to its Financial Services Regulatory and Compliance practice.

Two significant issues related to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act have received fresh attention at the Supreme Court, which is expected to make landmark rulings next year. The U.S. Solicitor General and a group of state attorneys general filed briefs in Freeman v. Quicken Loans, a case in which the high court will likely determine the ability of the mortgage lending industry to decide what to charge borrowers at the point of origination. RESPA Section 8(b) provides that “no person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split or percentage of...

The Federal Housing Finance Agency filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the City of Chicago this week to keep it from enforcing its recently amended “Vacant Buildings Ordinance” against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The move may provide servicers a way to fight the ordinance without bringing upon themselves any enforcement action from the city while the litigation is pending, according to some observers. “The City of Chicago is interfering unlawfully with FHFA’s federally mandated oversight and exercise of discretion, as conservator...

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley sued five major lenders late last week for allegedly illegal foreclosure practices. One of the firms, GMAC Mortgage, responded by pulling out of Massachusetts lending, prompting Coakley to request a Congressional investigation of GMAC. This week, the AGs of California and Nevada followed suit with a joint announcement of a dual mortgage fraud probe. “We have two clear goals with this lawsuit,” Coakley said. “One is to provide for real accountability for the roles the banks have played in unlawful and illegal foreclosures and second...

Patton Boggs, a large Washington DC-based law and lobbying firm, has seen an en masse exodus of its mortgage banking lawyers. Ballard Spahr created a Mortgage Banking Group for the three Patton Boggs partners and an associate, while Dykema welcomed two senior attorneys to its growing Financial Services Regulatory and Compliance practice. Patton Boggs did not return calls for comment regarding the future of its own mortgage practice, and the departed lawyers would not speculate as to the future of their former firm. Partners Richard Andreano, John Socknat and Michael Waldron...

In a move that further complicates the 50-state settlement discussions between the mortgage servicing industry and state attorneys generals, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, D, has sued a handful of top mortgage lending banks for allegedly pursuing illegal foreclosures and “deceptive loan servicing.”The targets of Coakley’s actions are Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, Citi and GMAC, as well as Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.“The single most important thing we can do to return to a healthy economy is to address this foreclosure crisis,” Coakley said. “Our suit alleges that the banks have charted a destructive path by cutting corners and rushing to foreclose on homeowners without following the rule of law. Our action today seeks real accountability for the banks’ illegal behavior and real relief for homeowners.”

A Federal judge in California rejected a servicer’s motion to dismiss a putative class action that accused the servicer of wrongly rejecting a borrower's mortgage modification application and of improperly starting foreclosure proceedings.In Gaudin v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc., the plaintiff argued that a trial modification plan provided to her by the lender represented a binding contract that required Saxon to evaluate the plaintiff under the Home Affordable Modification Program, and to provide a permanent loan mod, provided all conditions of the trial plan were satisfied.In requesting a dismissal, Saxon argued that the trial plan only required it to evaluate the borrower’s eligibility for a modification, and did not require Saxon to offer a modification.

Massachusetts. In Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of Nebraska, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts late last week granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Aurora, as holder of the plaintiff’s mortgage by assignment from Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., and as the servicer of the loan, could exercise the statutory power of sale and foreclose under Massachusetts laws. U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young held MERS may serve as the mortgagee as the lender’s nominee, MERS has the authority and right, and may assign mortgages in which it is named as the mortgagee, and such mortgages are valid and enforceable. Further, the judge concluded that, “The court holds that there was no flaw in this process. Under Massachusetts law, MERS lawfully held the legal title to Culhane’s mortgage in trust first for Preferred and subsequently for Deutsche.”