The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s first official budget – which will be funded by the Federal Reserve – segregates expenditures into three buckets, the lion’s share of which will go to the supervision, enforcement, fair lending and equal opportunity account. Outlays within this category are set to out-step the other two categories combined. After spending about $60 million in fiscal 2011, this SEFLEO bucket is set to climb to about $214 million for 2012 and $261 million next year. Consumer-related expenditures totaled $43 million in 2011 and are projected to roughly double ...

All mortgage lending related institutions under the regulatory purview of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are one step closer to a little more certainty about the confidentiality of the data and information they provide the agency and its officials after action by the House Financial Services Committee last week. The full committee passed H.R. 4014 (introduced by Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-MI), a measure that would stipulate that providing information to the CFPB for any purpose as part of the supervisory process would not be construed as waiving, destroying or otherwise affecting any ...

California. In Kathryn McOmie-Gray v. Bank of America Home Loans FKA Countrywide Home Loans Inc., the Ninth Circuit has ruled that the Truth in Lending Act sets a three-year limitation for the borrower to file notice of claim for loan rescission. McOmie-Gray sought rescission of her loan for alleged violations of disclosure requirements under TILA. The district court dismissed the suit as untimely because it was filed after the three-year period set by TILA. McOmie-Gray subsequently argued to the appeals court ...

In response to a request from the Federal Trade Commission, a U.S. district court has banned a number of defendants from providing mortgage relief services after the agency cracked down on an alleged scam that caused consumers to lose almost $19 million. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants deceptively claimed they were affiliated with or approved by consumers’ lenders, that they could prevent foreclosure, and that they would refund consumers’ money if they failed to deliver promised services. Consumers were allegedly instructed not to contact their lenders and to stop making ...

Observers in MBS and legal circles are closely watching how a federal judge will rule on a pending motion by UBS Americas to dismiss the mortgage securities lawsuit brought last summer by the Federal Housing Finance Agency on statute of limitations grounds and the ruling’s potential impact on other pending FHFA MBS litigation. The FHFA sued UBS in July and then filed a blizzard of 17 lawsuits against some of the industry’s biggest institutions, including Bank of America, Credit Suisse, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and others, seeking tens of billions of dollars in damages incurred by Fannie Mae and Freddie...

MBS investors were not at the negotiating table for the multistate servicing settlement, yet they will feel the reverberations of the principal reductions and loan modifications the banks have promised state attorneys general and federal agencies. The $25 billion agreement reached last week among 49 states, the federal government and five major servicers – Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Ally Financial – allocates $10 billion toward principal reductions for underwater borrowers at risk of default. The banks will cough up another $7 billion for other forms of borrower...

The $25.0 billion servicing settlement is just the latest step toward standardized servicing regulation, according to industry analysts. Many non-agency servicers have taken major steps to prepare for an overhaul of servicing regulation, though increased costs are a concern. “It appears that non-agency MBS servicers have already made significant operational changes in an effort to address process deficiencies identified in this settlement and by regulators,” Fitch Ratings said. As with federal consent orders several servicers agreed to last year ...

Citigroup, Inc. this week agreed to settle a civil fraud lawsuit with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Department of Housing and Urban Development alleging reckless mortgage lending practices. The $158.3 million settlement was reached on Feb. 15, hours after Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, filed a civil fraud lawsuit against CitiMortgage, a subsidiary of Citibank. The suit sought treble damages and civil penalties under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 and the False Claims Act, a federal Civil War-era statute Congress passed to ...

While the multistate servicing settlement reached by 49 states, federal officials and the nation’s five largest servicers gets the state and federal attorneys off the banks’ backs in regards to servicing and foreclosure, the banks are still wide open to servicing lawsuits from individuals, criminal charges and litigation over their securitization activities. “This is only one part of a long resolution process,” said Richard Andreano, practice leader of Ballard Spahr’s mortgage banking group. Despite complaints from a wide swath of consumer protection groups that the $25 billion in penalties to be...

In an unusual legal development, the City of St. Paul, MN, late last week suddenly removed its challenge in a case before the Supreme Court of the United States that could have produced a definitive ruling on the disparate impact theory of lending discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. What’s unusual in Magner v. Gallagher is that the city believes it would have prevailed in the nation’s highest court – but opted to ask for dismissal because city leaders came to the conclusion that a victory could substantially undermine important civil rights enforcement in housing throughout the nation. The city expects to...