The Securities and Exchange Commission this week filed a lawsuit against three former executives of Thornburg Mortgage regarding disclosure and accounting issues in early 2008. The former executives of the now bankrupt jumbo lender denied the charges and vowed to prevail in court. “Thornburg’s executives schemed to drop a disingenuous annual report into the public realm at the most opportune moment possible while knowing it was merely the calm before the next storm,” said Donald Hoerl, director of the SEC’s Denver regional office. Larry Goldstone and Clay Simmons, the former CEO and chief financial officer of Thornburg, respectively, countered that ...

RPM Mortgage announced last week that it is offering jumbos with balances of up to $2.5 million for no-limit cash-out refinances or home purchase. Fully amortized and interest-only payment options are available. The lender said it will hold the loans in portfolio. “Between extremely low interest rates and smart prices for homes, either on the move-up market or creating liquidity for investment purposes, this product has the ability to serve both types of borrowers,” said Rob Hirt, CEO of RPM Mortgage. “This exclusive RPM product was eleven months in the making and is our contribution toward helping the real estate market to get back on its feet.” [Includes three briefs]

Industry experts digging through thousands of pages of legal documents associated with the $25 billion foreclosure settlement agreed to by five major servicers mostly found what they expected: a complex package of mixed forms of borrower support that the banks are expected to implement sooner rather than later. The settlements involving Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Ally Financial and 49 state attorneys general will have to be approved by the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC. Although critics found grounds for complaint about the varying incentives for loan modification and...

Mortgage lenders have become so risk-averse and sensitive to potentially punitive judicial or regulatory overkill that they’re demanding near-pristine credit histories and imposing their own credit overlays on top of existing underwriting standards that are already considerably tougher than they were during the years of the mortgage boom. And that’s unlikely to change and may in fact get worse unless federal policymakers make dramatic changes to the legislative and regulatory landscape. That was the main take-away that Paul Miller, managing director and group head of financial services research at...

Bank of America may be prepared to pony up $8.5 billion to settle litigation with residential mortgage-backed securities investors, but it’s not conceding a point in the face of government accusations that it discriminated against mortgage borrowers with disabilities. Last week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development accused the bank of imposing unnecessary and burdensome requirements on borrowers who depended on disability income to qualify for their mortgages in violation of the Fair Lending Act. The bank also allegedly required some disabled borrowers to provide physician...

The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments last month in Freeman v. Quicken Loans (Case 10-1042), an important fee-splitting case under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and the initial consensus of leading industry attorneys following the case is that the high court appears to be favorably inclined towards Quicken’s side. “If questions raised by the justices are any indication of where the court is headed, I’d say the scales are tipped in the direction of a favorable decision for Quicken Loans,” said attorney Phillip Schulman, in the Washington, DC, office...

Consumer advocates may be railing against the $25 billion settlement the five largest mortgage servicers struck recently with 49 state attorneys general, but the participating banks are still vulnerable on a number of fronts, according to a top analyst at Moody’s Investors Service. On the one hand, “The settlement will have little to no financial effect on the banks and will remove some of the uncertainty surrounding mortgage servicing,” said Joseph Pucella, vice president and senior…

New Hampshire. In Dow v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust, the state Superior Court affirmed the role of MERS as the mortgagee of a mortgage loan, ruling that MERS has the authority to both hold and assign its interest in mortgages under state law. New Jersey. In U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Guillaume, the New Jersey Supreme Court last week ruled that state courts do not have to dismiss foreclosure actions if defects in the…

MBS investors continue to sweat over the impact of the $25 billion multistate servicing settlement, especially regarding potential conflicts of interest when banks own a second mortgage while servicing a securitized first lien. “The minimum requirement is that every time you modify a first lien, you have to modify the second lien to the same degree, or you have to write off the second lien entirely,” explained Shaun Donovan, secretary of Housing and Urban Development, at a housing conference earlier this week. Donovan characterized the treatment of home-equity loans in the settlement as a positive...

Wells Fargo & Co. is looking to hire an independent third-party expert to continue an investigation started by the bank in its capacity as corporate trustee of mortgage trusts that could compel lenders to repurchase soured mortgage loans contained in a 2007 non-agency MBS. According to reports, Wells Fargo wants to hire Law Debenture Trust Co. of New York to look into alleged defects in loans contained in Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-AR2 and to force JPMorgan Chase and its servicer subsidiary to repurchase the bad loans. Requests for comment to both Wells Fargo and Law Debenture had not...