Sage Bank, a Lowell, MA-based financial institution with less than $200 million in assets, will pay $1.18 million to settle allegations brought by the U.S. Department of Justice that it violated the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act by discriminating in the pricing of its mortgage loans to African-American and Hispanic borrowers. The government accused Sage Bank of charging African-American and Hispanic borrowers higher prices for residential mortgages than similarly situated white borrowers for reasons that had nothing to do with their creditworthiness. “Specifically, under Sage Bank’s pricing policy, each of its loan officers was assigned a target price, which was the price a loan officer was required to achieve on each home loan, regardless of a ...
The ability of mortgage servicers to call struggling borrowers and help them resolve their problems is being compromised by an order from the Federal Communications Commission and needs to be overturned, a trio of industry groups argued in a recently submitted legal brief. The FCC’s order, released June 18, 2015, aims to bolster consumer protections against unwanted telephone calls and texts by, in part, restricting the ability of mortgage servicers, debt collectors and others to make autodialed or prerecorded phone calls without prior express consent of the person called. Violators can be subject to fines of $500 per phone call. A challenge to the FCC’s order is being led by ACA International before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
The CFPB recently brought an $8 million enforcement action against Clarity Services, a national credit reporting firm based in Clearwater, FL, and its owner, Tim Ranney, for allegedly obtaining consumer credit reports illegally and for failing to appropriately investigate consumer disputes. Clarity focuses on data reporting for the under-banked, near prime, and subprime consumer segments, and provides information that is not available from traditional reporting agencies. Instead, its reports are derived from a variety of financial service providers, including auto financers, check cashers, prepaid card issuers, short-term installment lenders, peer-to-peer micro lenders, small-dollar credit lenders, and online small-dollar credit lenders. “Credit reporting plays a critical role in consumers’ financial lives,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Clarity and its owner mishandled ...
The CFPB recently filed a $2.59 million federal complaint against EOS CCA, a debt collection firm based in Norwell, MA, accusing the company of reporting and collecting on old cellphone debt that consumers disputed and EOS did not verify. The company also allegedly provided inaccurate information to credit reporting companies about the debt and failed to correct reported information that it had determined was inaccurate. The bureau’s action appears to revolve around the firm’s handling of just one large portfolio. According to the CFPB, in 2012, EOS paid AT&T $35.4 million for a portfolio of more than three million cellphone accounts with a total face value of $2.3 billion. “Many of these debts were old accounts that had been previously ...
Early this month, the CFPB denied a petition made by UniRush, the program manager for RushCard, a prepaid debit card, to modify a civil investigative demand (CID) the firm had received from the bureau near the end of October. The CID seeks documents, written reports and answers to interrogatories in connection with the bureau’s investigation into whether prepaid debit card issuers, processors, card networks, service providers to prepaid debit card issuers, or other unnamed persons “have engaged in or are engaging in unlawful acts and practices in connection with the offering, operating or servicing of prepaid debit cards.” UniRush seemed to shoot itself in the foot, according to the bureau’s decision and order. The CFPB’s account of the chronology suggests ...
The national loan limit for FHA-insured single-family mortgages will remain unchanged throughout 2016, but 188 counties will see their high-cost limits rise due to house-price changes. The FHA national loan limit “ceiling” for forward mortgages will remain at $625,500, while the FHA “floor” will stay at $271,050 for next year. For example, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Marin, and Silicon Valley, where the loan limits are currently at $625,500, will see no change in 2016. The same will be true for many counties whose FHA loan limits fall between the national floor and ceiling, like Sacramento and Fresno, for instance. On the other hand, 188 counties like Napa, Riverside, San Bernardino and San Diego will see their forward loan limits increase by at least $1,150 to as much as $30,240. Each year, FHA readjusts its loan limits based on 115 percent of the median house price in the area. The loan-limit floor is set at ...
An estimated $117.1 billion in VA-guaranteed home loans went into Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed security pools during the first nine months of 2015, according to an Inside FHA/VA Lending analysis of agency data. The totals for securitized VA purchase and refinance loans in Ginnie pools were almost even - $57.8 billion and $57.6 billion, respectively. Modified VA loans were also included in the total. The volume of VA-backed Ginnie securitization during the first nine months of 2015 far exceeded the $109.5 billion reported for all of 2014. Lenders attributed the production spike to a growing population of active-duty military personnel and veterans returning from foreign deployment and to better outreach efforts. VA originations accounted for 12.1 percent of loans underlying Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae MBS and 25.2 percent of insured loans in those pools. The securitized VA loans showed an ... [ 1 chart ]
Approximately $191.8 billion in FHA-insured mortgage loans were securitized during the first nine months of 2015, surpassing the $158.1 billion of FHA loans that were placed in Ginnie Mae pools last year, agency loan-level data show. Securitized FHA purchase loans accounted for $111.7 billion of Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities issued over the same period. FHA refinance securitization totaled $66.8 billion. Modified FHA loans were also included in Ginnie MBS totals. The FHA loans in Ginnie MBS had an average loan-to-value ratio of 92.9 percent and an average FICO score of 677.5 percent, reflecting the single-family program’s traditional borrower base. The loans had an average debt-to-income ratio of 39.8 percent. FHA loans accounted for 19.8 percent of loans that underlie Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae MBS. On the other hand, the same loans accounted for 41.2 percent of insured loans in ... [ 1 chart ]
The Department of Justice has announced settlements with two nonbank FHA originators to resolve allegations of FHA underwriting fraud and False Claims Act violations. Franklin American Mortgage in Franklin, TN, recently agreed to pay $70 million to resolve allegations it knowingly originated and underwrote FHA-insured loans that did not meet agency guidelines. There were also quality-control issues. According to the DOJ, Franklin Mortgage, a direct endorsement lender, agreed it had certified ineligible loans for FHA insurance starting Jan. 1, 2006, including single-family residential loans, reverse mortgages and streamlined refinances. Those loans later resulted in claims submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, causing losses to the FHA insurance fund. The DOJ also alleged that the nonbank lender employed unqualified junior underwriters and set high quotas for its ...
Quicken Loans’ chief executive officer reiterated threats by company owner Dan Gilbert to exit the FHA business amid concerns about a forthcoming lender-certification rule and an ongoing court battle with the Department of Justice. A report by Reuters quoted Gilbert earlier this week as saying he is considering pulling Quicken Loans out of the FHA market. In an interview with IMFnews, Quicken CEO Bill Emerson said top management would be remiss if it did not think about exiting the business. Quicken will decide whether to stay or go after the FHA releases its revised rule on lender certification later this month, he said. The revised proposal restores a provision initially removed from the original proposal, which would require lenders to certify that neither the firm nor its officers have been suspended, debarred or excluded from participation in any federal agency transactions. In addition, the revised proposed rule requires ...