With the CFPB declining to provide any more formal guidance on legal liability for secondary market players when originators make errors in TRID mortgage disclosures, a group of due diligence firms is moving ahead with its own clarifications. High-level sources familiar with the matter who spoke under the condition of anonymity said the forthcoming clarifications have been vetted by legal counsel and are almost ready for approval. Several top third-party review/due diligence firms are involved in the effort, including Clayton Holdings and Opus. All the major rating agencies are reportedly involved as well. “We’re working to calibrate our methodology, to bring it in line with the spirit of the CFPB letter,” said one attorney close to the matter. He was ...

Independent mortgage banks and mortgage subsidiaries of chartered banks were only able to squeeze out a paltry net gain of $493 on each loan they cranked out in the fourth quarter of 2015, a fraction of the $1,238 generated in the third quarter of 2015, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Quarterly Mortgage Bankers Performance Report. Proximity and correlation are not necessarily causation. But sometimes they are. In this case, TRID probably had something to do with the plunge. “Production profits dropped by over 60 percent in the fourth quarter of 2015 compared to the third quarter,” said Marina Walsh, MBA’s vice president of industry analysis. “With the Know Before You Owe (TRID) rule going into effect last Oct. 3 ...

A new survey by San Diego-based ClosingCorp of 1,000 repeat homebuyers who had purchased a home both before and after the CFPB’s integrated disclosure rule took effect found both negative and positive effects. To begin with, 64 percent of respondents said it was easier getting a mortgage under the old rules than under TRID. When it came to the amount of time it took to get and close a mortgage, 57 percent said it took longer under TRID than it did under the previous disclosure regime. Also, 51 percent of the respondents said there were more “unexpected costs, fees and surprises” in their most recent experience. On the other hand, 63 percent said that the new forms for loan estimates ...

Industry groups representing mostly smaller mortgage lending institutions had some suggested revisions for the CFPB to take into account as it considers updating its Home Mortgage Disclosure Act resubmission guidelines. “The current resubmission standards are simply impractical and will become even more unattainable when the revised HMDA rule goes into effect,” said the American Bankers Association and the Consumer Bankers Association in a joint comment letter to the bureau. Equally as important, the current standards demand a level of accuracy that far exceeds what is necessary to achieve HMDA’s purpose. “More reasonable data integrity standards will underline our members’ focus on responsibly providing credit to consumers who meet prudent underwriting standards; they will not detract from these vital purposes,” they ...

The Consumer Mortgage Coalition and the Mortgage Servicers Working Group wrote the CFPB recently to express their concerns with the bureau’s proposal on successors in interest and urged a more simplified approach instead. “While the CFPB stated that the successors in interest proposal was designed to make account information available to confirmed successors in interest, and to make loss mitigation procedures available to them, the proposal would not make these available,” the groups said. To begin with, privacy protections that the CFPB has not proposed to amend would continue to prohibit servicers from providing information absent borrower consent. “When the borrower does consent to disclosures, the disclosures are permitted under current law,” the CMC and the MSWG note. Also under ...

CFPB Director Richard Cordray last week defended the approach his agency has taken in its public enforcement actions, which many in the industry have criticized as “regulation by enforcement.” “I think that criticism is badly misplaced,” Cordray said Wednesday in a speech at a meeting of the Consumer Bankers Association in Phoenix. Certainly, he said, any responsible official charged with enforcing the law has to recognize that he should be thoughtful in how he deploys his agency’s limited resources most efficiently to protect the public. “That means working toward a pattern of actions that conveys an intelligible direction to the marketplace, so as to create deterrence that can be readily understood and implemented,” said the CFPB chief. The alternative, as ...

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California last week granted the CFPB’s request for a final judgement against debt relief company Morgan Drexen, Inc., bringing to an end a lawsuit filed by the bureau back in August 2013. The agency alleged that the company and its leadership charged illegal upfront fees for debt relief services and misrepresented their services to consumers. According to the CFPB, when consumers signed up for Morgan Drexen’s services, the company presented them with two contracts, one for debt settlement services and one for bankruptcy-related services. Based on its investigation, the bureau brought suit alleging that consumers who signed up sought services for debt relief and not bankruptcy, that little to no bankruptcy ...

Last week, the CFPB asked the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Southern Division to enter a final judgment and order that would shut down Student Loan Processing.US, and crack down on its sole owner, James Krause, for allegedly charging borrowers millions of dollars in illegal upfront fees for federal student loan services. The order would also require the company to pay refunds to thousands of consumers the bureau says were harmed, as well as a civil money penalty. In December 2014, the CFPB sued the company and Krause, alleging they illegally marketed and sold services promising to advise and assist borrowers applying for Department of Education student loan repayment programs. According to the bureau’s complaint, the ...

With the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau declining to provide any more formal guidance on legal liability for secondary market players when originators make errors in TRID mortgage disclosures, a group of due diligence firms is moving ahead with their own clarifications. High-level sources familiar with the matter, and who spoke to Inside MBS & ABS under the condition of anonymity, said the forthcoming clarifications have been vetted by legal counsel and are almost ready for viewing. Several top third-party review/due diligence firms are involved in the effort, including Clayton Holdings and Opus. All the major rating agencies are involved as well. “We’re working to calibrate our methodology, to bring it in line with the spirit of the CFPB letter,” said ...

With only a few isolated exceptions, VA and FHA lending was up sharply across the country last year, outstripping the private mortgage insurance business in nearly every state of the U.S., according to a new analysis by Inside FHA/VA Lending. Overall, FHA single-family mortgages securitized by Ginnie Mae increased 60.5 percent from 2014 and VA production was up 39.4 percent. Meanwhile, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac posted a more subdued 26.2 percent increase in privately-insured loan volume. California remained the biggest mortgage market for the FHA, VA and private MIs, as well as uninsured mortgages. The FHA clearly won the mortgage insurance battle, boosting its share of insured loans in the Golden State from 41.1 percent in 2014 to 49.2 percent last year thanks to a whopping 89.8 percent jump in business. California had one of the highest concentrations of ... [ 3 charts ]