Although much of the oxygen in the room is being taken up these days with concerns about the CFPB’s integrated disclosure rule, industry participants need to mind their Ps and Qs when it comes to the bureau’s loan originator compensation rule. During a recent webinar sponsored by Inside Mortgage Finance, an affiliated publication, top legal experts discussed how the industry can navigate a safe passage, compliance-wise. “We know that they’re going to really be looking at loan originator compensation plans this year,” said Kristie Kully, a partner with the Mayer Brown law firm in Washington, DC. “We know that they expect to find some problems in the LO comp area, and often when they expect to find them, they will ...

Mortgage banking industry representatives told the CFPB it should not be in a rush to make any changes to its resubmission guidelines for data that will be submitted under the bureau’s new Home Mortgage Disclosure Act rule. Because of continuing problems in implementing the integrated disclosure rule, “companies have not yet had available sufficient resources to begin HMDA implementation in earnest,” the Mortgage Bankers Association told the bureau in a recent comment letter. “Also, considering the unprecedented expansion of data elements required under the new HMDA rule, it can be anticipated that when implementation begins, there will be a far better understanding of myriad issues including appropriate resubmission guidelines.” Consequently, MBA said that while some changes may now be warranted, ...

For years, banks have had a losing record in FHA cases involving False Claims Act allegations. Hence, a federal appeals court’s decision to uphold dismissal of a $2.3 billion lawsuit against a major bank is a rarity. In U.S., ex rel. Advocates for Basic Legal Equality (ABLE) v. U.S. Bank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an FCA lawsuit against U.S. Bank because the conduct alleged by the qui tam relator had been previously disclosed publicly in a consent order with federal banking regulators. The court held that ABLE’s claims were barred because the conduct that allegedly violated the FCA had already been disclosed when the plaintiff filed suit in 2013. The Department of Justice declined to intervene. The relator suit alleged that U.S. Bank had a practice of initiating foreclosure on FHA-insured mortgages without complying with the ...

The Department of Veterans Affairs has issued additional lender guidance for dealing with the public water contamination problem in Flint, MI. The guidance expands on the agency’s minimum requirements for properties backed by VA loans. The guidance refers to policy in the VA Lender’s Handbook which requires properties to have “a continuing supply of safe and potable water for drinking and other household uses,” before being approved for a VA-backed home loan. In the VA’s view, safe and potable water also refers to water used for bathing, showering and sanitary uses. Properties not in compliance with this requirement will not be eligible for the VA guaranty. Proper mitigation of lead-contaminated water must include a central filtering system that is acceptable to local health authorities and that can provide safe and potable water. Appraisers must comment and adjust for any ...

Late last week, secondary market officials said the CFPB has been informed about the recent failure of W.J. Bradley Mortgage of Colorado and how it was caused by jumbo loans backing up on the nonbank’s warehouse line due to errors complying with the bureau’s integrated disclosure rule. At this point, it’s hard for some industry observers and officials to gauge just how bad those errors were. However, the bigger issue may be that curing TRID errors (especially small ones) is the key to solving the current TRID-mess afflicting the residential finance industry. Some industry observers wonder whether a fix can be made that helps mortgage compliance attorneys sleep at night. Right now, the answer to that question appears to be ...

Despite efforts by certain factions of the industry to come up with legal protections regarding errors on TRID disclosures, the “scratch and dent” market for problem loans continues apace. According to Jeff Bode, CEO of Mid America Mortgage – one of the most active buyers of mortgages with TRID errors – product is still being offered on a regular basis. “Offerings have not slowed,” Bode told affiliated publication IMFnews, “though, eventually, I think it will.” On average, Mid America bids on at least eight TRID scratch-and-dent loans a day. Some lenders report they have totally adjusted to the new TRID disclosures, while others continue to be plagued by errors and delays. Meanwhile, the CFPB plans to hold an hour-long webinar on Tuesday,...

With the CFPB declining to provide any more formal guidance on legal liability for secondary market players when originators make errors in TRID mortgage disclosures, a group of due diligence firms is moving ahead with its own clarifications. High-level sources familiar with the matter who spoke under the condition of anonymity said the forthcoming clarifications have been vetted by legal counsel and are almost ready for approval. Several top third-party review/due diligence firms are involved in the effort, including Clayton Holdings and Opus. All the major rating agencies are reportedly involved as well. “We’re working to calibrate our methodology, to bring it in line with the spirit of the CFPB letter,” said one attorney close to the matter. He was ...

Independent mortgage banks and mortgage subsidiaries of chartered banks were only able to squeeze out a paltry net gain of $493 on each loan they cranked out in the fourth quarter of 2015, a fraction of the $1,238 generated in the third quarter of 2015, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Quarterly Mortgage Bankers Performance Report. Proximity and correlation are not necessarily causation. But sometimes they are. In this case, TRID probably had something to do with the plunge. “Production profits dropped by over 60 percent in the fourth quarter of 2015 compared to the third quarter,” said Marina Walsh, MBA’s vice president of industry analysis. “With the Know Before You Owe (TRID) rule going into effect last Oct. 3 ...

A new survey by San Diego-based ClosingCorp of 1,000 repeat homebuyers who had purchased a home both before and after the CFPB’s integrated disclosure rule took effect found both negative and positive effects. To begin with, 64 percent of respondents said it was easier getting a mortgage under the old rules than under TRID. When it came to the amount of time it took to get and close a mortgage, 57 percent said it took longer under TRID than it did under the previous disclosure regime. Also, 51 percent of the respondents said there were more “unexpected costs, fees and surprises” in their most recent experience. On the other hand, 63 percent said that the new forms for loan estimates ...

Industry groups representing mostly smaller mortgage lending institutions had some suggested revisions for the CFPB to take into account as it considers updating its Home Mortgage Disclosure Act resubmission guidelines. “The current resubmission standards are simply impractical and will become even more unattainable when the revised HMDA rule goes into effect,” said the American Bankers Association and the Consumer Bankers Association in a joint comment letter to the bureau. Equally as important, the current standards demand a level of accuracy that far exceeds what is necessary to achieve HMDA’s purpose. “More reasonable data integrity standards will underline our members’ focus on responsibly providing credit to consumers who meet prudent underwriting standards; they will not detract from these vital purposes,” they ...