Federal prosecutors and members of the Justice Department’s Residential MBS Working Group are reportedly considering a new strategy for criminally charging Wall Street bankers for alleged fraud in their packaging and sale of MBS backed by subprime mortgages at the peak of the housing frenzy. According to Reuters, the members of the working group are eye-balling a shift in strategy that would involve moving away from the more widely used securities fraud charges to the less common offense of bank fraud. “Perpetrators of bank fraud can be charged up to 10 years after their crimes, compared with the five-year statute of limitations on securities fraud, which has already run out on most events leading up to the 2008 financial crisis,” Reuters reported. “A bank fraud conviction carries up to $1 million in fines and a maximum prison sentence of 30 years.” Laurence Platt, financial services practice leader in the Washington, DC, office of the K&L Gates law firm, said...

Federal regulators will make their next move on risk retention and defining qualified residential mortgages in September, according to the Federal Reserve. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission is working on a number of long-pending MBS rules, including the so-called Reg AB2. The Fed expects to take “further action” on risk retention in September, according to its latest regulatory agenda. The SEC, which is jointly working on the risk-retention rule with the Fed and other agencies, was vague, stating that the next action date was “undetermined.” Regulators have received...

With six months left before a host of rules from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau kick in, mortgage industry representatives continue to ask for changes and clarifications – including some related to the components of the pending “qualified mortgage” points-and-fees calculation. Early this month, the CFPB formally proposed for public comment amendments to rules issued in January under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Lending Act. Much of the focus of the proposed amendments relates to loan originator compensation and mortgage servicing issues. Industry commenters focused...

In what may well be his last appearance before Congress as chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke this week indicated the central bank’s much-debated “tapering” of its massive asset purchase program is likely to begin later this year and then cease altogether by the middle of 2014, assuming the U.S. economy progresses as the Fed anticipates. At the same time, the Fed chief emphasized the Federal Open Market Committee will continue to be flexible in responding to market and economic conditions, all based on the flow of data coming into the committee. Bernanke said the FOMC has made...

The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Treasury Department illegally implemented the so-called sweep amendment last summer that altered Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s preferred stock purchase agreements to seize nearly all the two GSEs’ profits, in direct violation of the 2008 conservatorship legislation, according to investors’ lawsuits filed in federal court last week. Unlike the initial litigation filed by investors last month that challenges the entire 2008 government takeover of Fannie and Freddie, the separate suits filed by hedge-fund Perry Capital and by Fairholme Capital Management claim that Treasury’s August 2012 amendment to the preferred stock purchase agreements violated the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, which placed the GSEs in conservatorship.

The high-stakes game of chicken Congressional Democrats and Republicans have been playing for the better part of the last two years over President Obama’s nomination of Richard Cordray to be director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau came to an end this week as GOP members of the Senate blinked first. On Tuesday, the Republicans agreed to allow an up-or-down vote on Cordray to avert a showdown over longstanding filibuster rules in the Senate. Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, has been threatening to upend the Senate’s traditional filibuster mechanism and change the rule under which presidential nominees must receive 60 votes in order to be approved. Cordray’s nomination to a full five-year term was approved...

The CFPB’s final rule to integrate the consumer mortgage disclosures under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Lending Act is now projected to be issued sometime in October, a month later than had previously been indicated, according to the bureau’s semi-annual regulatory agenda update. The RESPA/TILA disclosure rule will be the last significant mortgage-related rulemaking as stipulated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act for the foreseeable future. All of the...

The New York State Department of Financial Services has directed FHA lenders to refrain from applying the FHA’s higher mortgage insurance premiums in calculating a loan’s annual percentage rate and fully indexed rates for 60 days to prevent loans from becoming “high cost” or subprime. At the same time, the department issued guidance to conventional lenders on how to interpret existing provisions in state banking law regarding subprime loans. Statutory changes were made in 2009 to prevent some loans from becoming “subprime,” as defined by state law. Spikes in mortgage interest rates in the past few weeks plus ...

The Department of Veterans Affairs has urged holders and servicers of home loans with a VA guaranty to consider principal reduction when evaluating a distressed loan for possible modification. In a recent circular, the VA noted that it is not able to reimburse any principal reduction because a VA claim is payable only upon termination of a loan, and any forgiven amount is no longer part of the borrower’s mortgage debt. However, principal reduction in a loan modification may produce a higher expected return for a servicer than termination of the loan, the VA said. This is especially true when the sum of the ...

Two different groups holding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stock filed suit against the government this week claiming that the Treasury Department and the Federal Housing Finance Agency are illegally poaching the profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that should go to shareholders. The FHFA and Treasury illegally implemented the so-called sweep amendment last summer that altered Fannie’s and Freddie’s preferred stock purchase agreements, according to the suits. The amended agreement allows the government to seize nearly all the profits of the two government-sponsored enterprises. This is a direct violation of the 2008 conservatorship legislation, according to the lawsuit filed by hedge fund Perry Capital in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Less than two days later, Fairholme Capital Management filed...