Are Home Builders Next on the CFPB’s MSA Hit List? Lender anxiety tied to the CFPB’s crackdown on marketing services agreements is reaching a new fever pitch these days, while spreading to other sectors of the housing finance industry, namely home builders and Realtors. Industry officials interviewed by Inside Mortgage Finance, an affiliated newsletter, recently said title insurance affiliates owned by Realtors and home builders are a particular area of concern – namely pushing customers into using service providers in which they have an ownership stake. “I’ll tell you where the RESPA [Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act] violation is – it’s pressing customers into using their title company,” said one trade group executive. “The idea is that the consumer gets to pick ...
Buyer Agents Report Delays in Closing, Thanks to TRID. One month into the CFPB’s Truth in Lending Act/Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule, some real estate closings are already being affected, according to a recent survey conducted by the National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents. The survey went out to brokers across the U.S. and nearly 20 percent said they are already seeing issues, mostly delays in closing. According to one respondent, “Lenders are almost all asking for 45 days to closing versus the previous 30 days.” Another respondent stated, “We’ve been advised to prepare for further delays until everyone has more experience with the new CFPB/TRID regulations.” “At NAEBA, we applaud the CFPB for its efforts ...
The Structured Finance Industry Group put out the third edition of its RMBS 3.0 “Green Papers” initiative early this week, featuring dozens of model representations and warranties for new non-agency residential MBS, including a range of proposed standardized constructs. “This release substantially builds upon our growing series of Green Papers, which are aimed at restoring confidence to the ‘private label’ RMBS market,” the trade group said. The first and second editions were released in 2014. The 39 model reps and warrants included in the third edition complete...
Publicly traded real estate investment trusts that buy MBS continued to whittle down their positions in government and agency product during the third quarter, a trend that some fear may have no bottom. Market leader Annaly Capital Management trimmed its MBS holdings to $66.3 billion during the period, a 1.9 percent sequential decline, but an ugly 18.6 percent drop compared to the third quarter of last year. It is investing more of its cash in commercial product. Number two ranked American Capital Agency Corp. was...[Includes one data table]
The hedging results of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – including instruments bought to protect the value of agency MBS – had different results in the third quarter as interest rates unexpectedly declined and stayed low for several weeks. Overall, Fannie booked $2.6 billion of negative charges against the value of its derivatives in the third quarter while Freddie booked a much larger charge on its hedging activities: $4.2 billion. The differential did not pass...
The authors want the Treasury Department to end the quarterly profit sweep and allow Fannie and Freddie to raise about $100 billion in additional capital through several rounds of new common stock sales...
A recent settlement between DBRS and the Securities and Exchange Commission suggests that in the years following the financial crisis, the rating service didn’t dedicate enough resources to reviewing ratings on outstanding non-agency MBS. The SEC found that between April 2009 and February 2011, DBRS employed only one analyst who was principally responsible for the majority of surveillance tasks for the firm’s outstanding ratings for non-agency MBS and real estate mortgage investment conduits. DBRS had more than 5,000 applicable ratings outstanding in that span. The SEC added...
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association recently filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants to reverse a case in which the Federal Housing Finance Agency argued that Nomura Holdings sold shoddy MBS to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In the case of FHFA vs. Nomura Holdings, a judge ruled in May, after a three-week bench trial, that Nomura and RBS Securities were liable for the claims brought by the FHFA and knowingly sold bad MBS to the government-sponsored enterprises before the 2008 financial crisis. The MBS were backed by mortgages with an unpaid principal balance of about $2.05 billion at the time of purchase. Nomura appealed...
Federal regulators late last month rejected industry requests that swap agreements entered into by securitization vehicles be exempt from new capital and margin requirements. The three federal banking regulators, along with the Federal Housing Finance Agency, finalized a rule that requires covered swap entities to collect and post initial margin to counterparties that are swap entities or financial end users with material swaps exposure of $8 billion or more. The Structured Finance Industry Group had argued...
RSS