The Federal Housing Finance Agency found itself on the defensive this week following a rapid-fire series of highly critical reports issued by its inspector general that questioned the agency’s capacity to oversee Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac effectively, as well as its decisions in specific cases. The FHFA Office of Inspector General said late last week that the FHFA’s examination program, the primary means by which it supervises and regulates the government-sponsored enterprises, faces “capacity and transparency shortfalls.” “The agency has too few examiners to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of...

As state regulators ratchet up their examinations of licensed mortgage companies, lenders are beginning to look for a way to raise concerns and ask questions during the evaluation. Such a mechanism might take the form of an ombudsman or neutral feedback loop that would allow for clarification. “The exam process is supposed to be about regulatory compliance and operation soundness. Right now, there’s no way for licensed mortgage companies to go back to the [Conference of State Bank Supervisors] to get questions answered or provide real-time feedback,” noted Donald Lampe, the leader of Dykema’s financial...

A proposal from federal regulators to change servicer compensation on future Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac MBS to a fee-for-service model could also end up addressing a major investor beef about the non-agency MBS market: poor servicing of distressed loans and misaligned interests. The Federal Housing Finance Agency this week released a discussion paper outlining a radical change from an existing system that pays Fannie and Freddie servicers a minimum servicing fee regardless of the loan status. The proposed system features a low flat fee for handling performing loans with increased compensation for...

The share of mortgage loans that were held in portfolio rather than sold into the secondary market rose for the second consecutive year in 2010, but that may have more to do with the peculiarities of the rules for complying with the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. A Federal Reserve analysis of the lastest HMDA data found that portfolio lending, especially involving owner-occupied refinance loans, has risen since the beginning of 2009 but is still far short of the levels portfolio lenders achieved in 2004 and 2005. Overall, originators held a total of 1.30 million mortgages in portfolio in 2010, with...

The Securities and Exchange Commission is considering launching a civil injunctive action against Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, alleging violations of federal securities laws with respect to the company’s ratings for a 2007 collateralized debt obligation. According to a Form 8-K filing this week by McGraw-Hill, the rating service’s parent, the federal agency is looking into S&P’s rating of Delphinus CDO 2007-1, which was to be mostly backed by non-agency residential MBS. “In connection with the contemplated action, the [SEC] staff may recommend that the commission seek civil money penalties, disgorgement of fees and...

Information sharing and the potential erosion of confidentiality and privileged protection will become critically important for the industry as it struggles to keep up with all of the compliance challenges it will face, especially where the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is involved. “What scares me more than anything [about the CFPB] is the information-sharing stuff, because they’ve committed themselves to sharing information with the state attorneys general and the banking agencies,” Larry Platt, practice area leader with K&L Gates’ financial services practice, told attendees at a mortgage regulatory conference sponsored in the nation’s capital last week by SourceMedia. “That’s really worrisome because that’s a portal to banks that, in theory, they didn’t otherwise have.”

Fair lending, along with unfair, deceptive and abusive acts and practices (UDAAP), will become increasingly significant and potentially more problematic for the mortgage lending community as regulators at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau pay more attention to such issues going forward, a top consultant told industry representatives last week. “The keys for mortgage lending, from the enforcement side, are going to be fair lending – the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending have become very entwined – and UDAAP,” said Jo Ann Barefoot, co-chair of Treliant Risk Advisors and former deputy comptroller of the currency, to attendees of a mortgage regulatory conference sponsored in the nation’s capital by SourceMedia.

The 14 mortgage servicing firms hit by the enforcement actions brought by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency can expect to see soon a new process by which individual borrowers facing foreclosure can request an independent review, outgoing Acting Comptroller of the Currency John Walsh told industry representatives last week. “As we explored the best means of ensuring that injured homeowners had the opportunity to seek relief, it became clear that what was needed was a robust, transparent and accessible complaint process that will give borrowers the opportunity to request an independent foreclosure review,” Walsh said at a mortgage regulatory forum sponsored by SourceMedia. “I’m happy to say in the next several weeks you’ll see the roll out of just such a process.”

Top lender groups are asking the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to provide a little more clarification to its recent interim final regulation on alternative mortgage transactions, particularly when it comes to the definition of such a transaction. The American Bankers Association and the Mortgage Bankers Association both support the CFPB’s inclusion of renegotiable rate balloon and shared appreciation mortgages within the AMT definition. However, they both asked that some of the reg’s commentary be clarified to explicitly state that preferred rate loans with fixed rates and price level adjusted mortgages, otherwise considered “variable rate transactions,” also be identified as examples of alternative mortgage transactions.

Certain elements of the Dodd-Frank Act such as the new standard related to unfair, deceptive and abuse acts and practices (UDAAP), along with the Federal Reserve’s “ability to repay” provisions proposal, present “significant litigation risk” to lenders, a top litigation attorney told industry representatives early this week. Speaking to attendees at the Mortgage Bankers Association’s regulatory compliance conference in Washington, DC, on Sunday, Andrew Stutzman, a partner with Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young LLP, said, “I’m very troubled by Dodd-Frank in many respects. I think it … and the regulations that are coming out and have come out – the Fed’s ability-to-repay proposal – are extremely complicated and extremely confusing.”