Bank of America and the Department of Justice recently agreed to the largest residential fair lending settlement in history – for $335 million. The DOJ claimed that Countrywide Financial allowed pricing discrimination against minority borrowers as well as unchecked steering to subprime loans. The settlement, which is subject to court approval, will mark the first time that the DOJ has obtained relief for borrowers who were steered into loans based on race or national origin. The DOJ said the practice “systematically placed borrowers of color into subprime mortgage loan products while placing non-Hispanic white borrowers with similar creditworthiness in prime loans.” ...

The government-sponsored enterprises’ increased subprime activity in the mid-part of the last decade was driven by compensation incentives for former executives, the Securities and Exchange Commission claims. The allegations were included in recent lawsuits filed by the SEC regarding Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s disclosure of non-prime activity. In December, the SEC filed securities fraud lawsuits against six former GSE executives. The SEC claims the executives – including former Fannie CEO Daniel Mudd and former Freddie CEO Richard Syron – knew of and approved misleading statements in 2007 and 2008 claiming that the companies had minimal holdings of higher-risk mortgages. ...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced this week that it will immediately begin supervision of non-bank servicers and lenders. The supervision became possible due to President Obama’s controversially executed appointment of Richard Cordray as director of the CFPB. “Since most of these businesses are not used to any federal oversight, our new supervision program may be a challenge for them,” Cordray said this week of non-banks. “But we must establish clear standards of conduct so that all financial providers play by the rules.” ...

MBS issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government will continue to maintain a zero-risk weighting under the Federal Reserve’s proposed supervisory rules for large bank holding companies, but that won’t necessarily include Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac MBS. The Fed proposal includes a wide range of issues such as capital, liquidity, credit exposure, stress testing, risk management and early remediation. It applies to bank holding companies with assets of $50 billion or more and non-bank institutions that could pose systemic risk to the financial system. The proposal reflects substantially all of the...

Gibbs & Brun, the Houston-based law firm that spearheaded a massive investor lawsuit against Bank of America, has drawn a bead on Wells Fargo. The company announced this week that its non-agency MBS investor clients have asked two trustees – U.S. Bank and HSBC – to investigate whether ineligible mortgages were pooled in some $19 billion of Alt A and jumbo MBS issued by Wells Fargo between 2005 and 2007. Some 48 securitization trusts are covered by the action, and Gibbs & Brun said it represented investors who collectively held over a quarter of the voting rights in those trusts. “Clients...

Bank of America reached a landmark $335 million agreement with the Department of Justice to settle allegations that Countrywide systematically discriminated against African-American and Hispanic borrowers during the housing boom, manipulating them into taking subprime loans when they were qualified for prime financing. It’s the largest settlement ever for a residential fair lending claim. The case also marks the first time the Justice Department has alleged and obtained relief for borrowers who were steered into mortgages on the basis of their race or national origin, a practice that placed...

There’s a very good chance the final disposition of securities fraud charges leveled by the Securities and Exchange Commission against six former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac top executives could be determined at trial rather than by a pre-trial settlement, thanks in part to a recent adverse SEC court decision, according to one legal expert. On Dec. 16, the SEC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that former Fannie and Freddie executives made material misstatements to the public, investors and the media about the two government-sponsored...

President Obama this week moved to break a GOP blockade in the Senate by making a recess appointment of Richard Cordray to become director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a political maneuver that defies 20 years of precedent and may set the stage for a legal challenge. The Obama administration claimed that it is fully within its Constitutional authority to place the new director into his position, dismissing as a gimmick the pro-forma sessions Republicans used to block the nomination. A number of consumer groups came out in support of the appointment. The president’s allies in Congress were...

The Federal Housing Finance Agency should refrain from implementing a proposal that would overhaul the mortgage servicing compensation system as it has failed to make a “compelling case” as to why it is necessary to change a system that has “worked well for decades,” according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.In a comment letter sent to the Finance Agency earlier this month, MBA President and CEO David Stevens said the FHFA’s proposed changes would dramatically alter residential servicing, origination and secondary market operations, not necessarily for the better.“The current servicer compensation model is still the best approach and making radical changes, like the proposed ‘fee-for-service,’ will have dramatic impacts not just on originators, servicers and investors but also on borrowers in both the costs they pay to get a mortgage and the support they receive from their servicers,” said Stevens.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency last week filed suit against the city of Chicago claiming that its attempt to enforce a recently amended vacant buildings ordinance on properties owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “impermissibly encroaches” on the FHFA’s role as sole regulator of the GSEs.Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the FHFA’s lawsuit on behalf of the two GSEs seeks to prevent the city from enforcing the ordinance which requires mortgagees to pay a $500 registration fee for vacant properties and requires monthly inspections of mortgage properties to determine if they are vacant. "The ordinance would impose on the enterprises the responsibilities, but not the benefits of ownership of vacant property on which they hold the mortgage,” said the FHFA in a statement. “The ordinance would create risks and liabilities for the enterprises at a time when they are already supported by taxpayers, including those in the city of Chicago.”