Advocates for GSE reform say recent actions by the Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency have made it more important than ever for policymakers to start moving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac away from government support or risk seeing the two enterprises enveloped forever within the federal budget. Two former Bush administration Treasury officials made their case this week in a Washington Post opinion piece, citing the government’s recent sale of stock in insurance giant American International Group to recoup the bailout billions Uncle Sam floated the company during the financial crisis as an admittedly inexact blueprint for Congress and the White House to follow to get the feds out of Fannie and Freddie.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has proposed a rule to acquire explicit discretionary authority to require Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or any of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks to undergo a stress test every year, no matter how much the GSEs have in consolidated assets. The proposed rule, published in the Oct. 5 Federal Register, would implement a part of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires certain financial companies with consolidated assets of more than $10 billion, and which are regulated by a primary federal financial regulatory agency, to conduct an annual stress test.

There is vast room for improvement in how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac manage their deficiency collections following foreclosure but it is the GSEs’ regulator that should provide more “guidance” about how to effectively pursue and collect from strategic defaulters, concluded the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s official watchdog this week.The FHFA Office of Inspector General’s latest audit found that in 2011, Fannie’s and Freddie’s vendors pursued 35,231 deficiency accounts, with a combined value of about $2.1 billion. Of this amount, vendors recouped some $4.7 million, a dismal recovery rate of 0.22 percent.

The legal backlog of cases pending against the GSEs and former company officials got a little shorter following the recent dismissal of two separate federal lawsuits against three defendants. A federal judge in Washington this week dismissed a long-simmering class-action lawsuit against Fannie Mae’s former Chief Financial Officer Timothy Howard brought by investors hoping to recover damages.Two Ohio pension funds – the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, filed suit in 2004 related to a $6.3 billion overstatement of earnings against Fannie and three former GSE executives, including CEO Franklin Raines.

A federal appeals court has refused to suspend proceedings in the case brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency against one of the non-agency mortgage-backed securities issuers and underwriters for allegedly misrepresenting the deals that were sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month made short work of rejecting the motion by UBS Americas to put the suit on hold while the appeals court hears UBS’ appeal of a lower court’s decision not to dismiss the case. “Upon due consideration, it is hereby ordered the motion is denied,” the judges ruled in their terse one-sentence Oct. 1 order.

A plethora of new servicing rules from federal and state regulators are set to increase costs for servicers – particularly mid-sized and small servicers that have not faced servicing changes required by disciplinary actions. The latest and perhaps most significant proposal for servicing rules came from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in August. “Change imposes significant pressure on servicer costs, resources, and capacity,” David Stevens, president and CEO of Mortgage Bankers Association said last week in a comment letter submitted to the CFPB. “The mortgage industry has been going through chronic, piecemeal regulatory changes for some time, with no end in sight. The costs are becoming prohibitive for many smaller, and even larger, companies.” He warned...

Major banks reported increased charge offs and nonperforming assets for home-equity loans in the third quarter of 2012 due to new guidance from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. However, bank officials and industry analysts suggest that banks have largely already reserved for the new reported losses and that overall trends point toward improvements in HEL performance. In June, the OCC updated its accounting guidance to require banks to classify mortgages and other loans discharged by troubled borrowers in bankruptcy as troubled debt restructurings. The agency said a bank should charge off the excess of the loan’s carrying amount over the fair value of the collateral with the remaining balance of the loan placed into non-accrual status. “The bankruptcy court ‘removed’...

The mortgage industry does not appear to be making much headway when it comes to reducing the volume of complaints consumers lodge with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In fact, according to the CFPB’s latest consumer complaint report, mortgage-related issues are becoming more prevalent. As of the end of the third quarter, the CFPB had received approximately 79,200 consumer complaints, including approximately 36,300 related to mortgages (46 percent), 23,400 for credit cards (30 percent), 12,900 related to bank accounts and services complaints (16 percent), and 2,900 having to do with private student loans (4 percent). Three months earlier, mortgages accounted...

Four borrowers from Alabama with adjustable-rate mortgages filed a class-action lawsuit this month against 12 banks that establish the London Interbank Offered Rate. The lawsuit suggests that more than 10,000 borrowers meet the class specifications, which cover loans originated from 2000 through 2009, and that the banks made millions of dollars or even billions due to alleged collusion. “This matter arises from a global conspiracy to fix or set LIBOR – the reference point for setting interest rates on ARMs and other loans – by a cabal of prominent financial institutions,” according to the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit is believed to be the first from borrowers regarding LIBOR manipulation. The plaintiffs claim...

The mortgage lending industry is universally opposed to a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposal to establish a new, more comprehensive “all in” annual percentage rate formula that would include various additional fees and charges. The APR provision is one part of the CFPB’s extensive proposed rule intended to simplify and integrate the mortgage disclosures consumers are entitled to under the Truth in Lending Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The overhaul was mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. In the proposed rule, which came out in July, the bureau would replace...