When rates spiked this week, margin calls to MBS investors increased. Lenders are nervous but next will will be the real test, mortgage executives told Inside Mortgage Finance.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has no interest in revisiting a program that Fannie Mae spent a year developing to directly purchase force-placed insurance even as it solicited input last week from “stakeholders” during a two-day, closed-door working group. The invitation-only meeting, closed to the public and press, drew some 80 attendees representing big banks, insurers, insurance brokers, other regulators and representatives of industry and consumer groups who weighed in as the Finance Agency decides its policy direction on force-placed or lender-placed insurance. According to those in attendance at the meeting, the FHFA officials were cordial but the agenda was strictly focused on concerns that force-placed premiums might be too high and that the industry lacks serious competition.

With the advent of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, consumer complaints have been elevated to an unprecedented level of prominence in the regulatory arena. “How many of you have had a regulatory exam that focused on complaints?” asked Lyn Farrell, managing director at Treliant Risk Advisors, at a discussion session during the recent American Bankers Association’s compliance conference in Chicago. Seeing a number of hands rise from the audience in response, she continued: “If not, you will.” ...

The Supreme Court of the United States announced this week that it will hear a legal dispute that would determine whether the Fair Housing Act – and perhaps, by extension, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act – permit claims under the “disparate impact” theory of discrimination. “The threshold issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs may use disparate impact to allege a violation under the Fair Housing Act rather than proving liability by demonstrating an actual intent to discriminate,” explained attorneys with the Dykema Gossett law firm. In Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, the plaintiff citizen group is challenging...

There is still no official word on when the Senate Banking Committee will take up the nomination of Rep. Mel Watt to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

When rates rise, loan officers begin to bite their nails, unless they are heavily reliant on purchase-money loans.

The Corker-Warner GSE bill could see the light of day next Tuesday. Meanwhile, HLSS is selling more shares to the public.

OneWest Bank’s decision to sell $78 billion in unpaid principal balance of mortgage servicing rights and related servicing advance receivables to Ocwen Financial continues the trend of banks unloading servicing with special servicers. However, the deal is unique in that OneWest’s owners have been looking to cash out of the entire banking operation for a while. Ocwen announced late last week that it will buy the MSRs and servicing advance receivables for $2.53 billion, with the sale expected to close in stages this year. “We have entered into a definitive agreement with Ocwen Loan Servicing to sell our third-party mortgage servicing rights for forward mortgages in order to sharpen our focus on developing a leading regional banking franchise,” said Joseph Otting, president and CEO of OneWest. The bank was...

The chief enforcer of a massive settlement involving five top servicers portrayed the results of the most recent round of compliance testing as confirmation of issues that need to be “rectified” and the need for holding servicers accountable. Shaun Donovan, secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said the failure of the five servicers on eight compliance tests shows that “abuses shamefully endure.” He put the companies on notice that they would face monetary penalties if they don’t comply. The report from the Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight did show...

Mortgage lending industry representatives were unanimous in their view that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s ability-to-repay rule and “qualified mortgage” standard, as currently constituted, may severely restrict access to mortgage credit on multiple levels. Testifying earlier this week before the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit, James Gardill, chairman of the board of WesBanco, Inc., said on behalf of the American Bankers Association that the QM rule will limit mortgage lending because the QM guidelines narrow lending parameters. “Even within the QM framework, many concerns remain that could limit credit availability to a diverse group of consumers,” Gardill said. Debra Still, chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association, said...