Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac retained sizeable shares of mortgage securities with a not insignificant bump during the fourth quarter of 2011, according to a new Inside The GSEs analysis.The GSEs issued a combined $261.6 billion in MBS in the fourth quarter, a 13.0 percent increase from the third quarter.Fannie and Freddie dropped to $852.8 billion in MBS issued for the year, an 11.1 percent decrease in MBS issuance during the January to December period. The GSEs issuance represented 72.1 percent of total MBS produced during 2011.Between the two companies, Fannie and Freddie registered an ample 77.1 percent share of new MBS issued during the quarter that ended Dec. 31, 2011, up from the 69.1 percent the two companies held during the third quarter and surpassing the 74.8 percent share both GSEs held during the first quarter.
A Federal judge in Chicago tabled for the moment the Federal Housing Finance Agencys hopes of a speedy ruling in its favor of its lawsuit to exempt Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from the citys new vacant building ordinance, although the judge appears open to hearing the FHFAs jurisdictional argument.Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Joan Lefkow denied the FHFAs request for summary judgment in its lawsuit against Chicago while she ordered the city to file its response to the Finance Agencys litigation.Filed in December, the FHFAs lawsuit on behalf of the two GSEs seeks to prevent the city from enforcing the ordinance which requires mortgagees to pay a $500 registration fee for vacant properties and requires monthly inspections of mortgage properties to determine if they are vacant.
Despite watching two long-time competitors shoved to the sidelines by eroding reserves, private mortgage insurers continued a slow rebound from near-irrelevance just two years ago, while crowning a new market leader for the first time since 1994. Exactly who the new industry leader isnt clear. Most private mortgage insurers include Home Affordable Refinance Program loan originations in the new insurance written figures that they report to Inside Mortgage Finance. However, United Guaranty has declined to participate in our survey, and the numbers released by AIG, the MIs...(Includes three data charts)
Congressional lawmakers, still smoldering over multi-million dollar bonuses paid to executives of taxpayer-subsidized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are moving aggressively to cut compensation levels at the government-sponsored enterprises. Last week the Senate approved by voice vote an amendment to prohibit top GSE executives from receiving such bonuses while Fannie and Freddie remain in federal conservatorship. The two companies have received more than $182.0 billion in aid since the government takeover in September 2008. Sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-AZ, and Jay Rockefeller, D-WV...
State attorneys general and federal officials this week announced a massive legal settlement with five major mortgage servicers, finally concluding a torturous 16-month-long negotiation. Some 49 states including New York, California and Florida agreed to the $25 billion settlement with JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Ally Bank and Citigroup. The agreement does not provide blanket immunity for the lenders, which can still face criminal charges and are subject to claims over securitization practices and claims brought by individual borrowers. The agreement is based on investigations by...
Moodys Investor Services ranked as the most active rating service in the non-mortgage ABS market last year, but finished 2011, as the least involved in non-agency MBS activity, according to a new Inside MBS & ABS ranking and analysis. Moodys rated a total of $89.3 billion of non-mortgage ABS last year, or 70.4 percent of total issuance. That was up from a 53.7 percent share in 2010, when Moodys rated some $58.9 billion and finished second to Standard & Poors. Moodys strengths in 2011 were in the credit card, vehicle finance and business loan sectors, capturing over 70.0 percent of each of those...
A week after federal and state enforcement agencies launched a residential MBS investigative effort, reports have surfaced that Ally Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs are about to be sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly misrepresenting the quality of mortgages they packaged and sold to investors. Officials at the SEC, which never confirms specific Wells Notices of impending legal action, declined to comment on the investigation, as did spokesmen for Ally, Citi and Goldman. Representatives from Bank of America and Deutsche Bank did not...
Housing economists challenged the Federal Housing Finance Agencys controversial stance against permitting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to allow principal forgiveness in loan modifications, telling U.S. senators this week that mortgage loan writedowns would go a long way to cure the ongoing housing crash and foreclosure crisis. Testifying before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Moodys Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi told lawmakers that government policy encouraging more mortgage modifications, particularly those involving substantial principle writedowns would...
The Federal Housing Finance Agency might be backing away from its controversial suggestion to change mortgage servicer compensation from the current 25 basis points of outstanding principal balance to a flat fee of $10 per mortgage, per month for current loans, with no incremental fees other than existing incentive compensation for the servicing of non-performing mortgages. Considering changes to the structure of mortgage servicing compensation is an important component of improving the operations of the future mortgage market, an FHFA spokeswoman said. We received useful input on ...
Both the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Freddie Mac are refuting a published report suggesting that a mortgage finance vehicle at one time employed by the government-sponsored enterprise was designed to profit the company by preventing homeowners from refinancing. An article published this week by ProPublica and National Public Radio contended that Freddie stood to profit from hedging investments known as inverse floaters that would pay higher returns if interest rates rose and more homeowners remained in mortgages with high interest rates. According to ProPublica, Freddie purchased inverse floaters...