Long awaited alterations to the Home Affordable Refinance Program announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency this week are expected to be of some relief to underwater homeowners but it will do little to endear the Finance Agency to its critics, particularly among House Democrats, who think the FHFA should do more.Among the new HARP enhancements is the elimination of certain risk-based fees for borrowers who refinance into shorter-term mortgages and lower fees for other borrowers. Also removed is the current 125 percent loan-to-value ceiling for fixed rate mortgages backed by the government-sponsored enterprises.

Fannie Mae earlier this month released additional results of its new servicer evaluation program for the first half of 2011, noting that 11 out of 13 servicers in this peer group are considered on track to meet at least median performance levels.In February, Fannie rolled out its Servicer Total Achievement and Rewards (STAR) program, designed to encourage customer service improvements and better foreclosure prevention outcomes for homeowners by rating servicers on their performance in those areas. Fannie categorizes servicers into three peer groups based on the number of loans they service, with each servicer scored using the Servicer Performance Scorecard. STAR ratings are based on a five-star scale.

The chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees the GSEs unveiled a bill late this week that seeks to drastically overhaul the secondary mortgage market – without the need for Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.The Private Mortgage Market Act would create a heavily regulated mortgage-backed securities market consisting strictly of private entities functioning without a federal guarantee, according to Rep. Scott Garrett, R-NJ.Garrett, who chairs the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, said the goal of his legislation is to facilitate continued standardization and uniformity, ensure rule of law and provide MBS investors with the necessary transparency and standardization to ensure “that a deep and liquid market develops” without Fannie and Freddie.

The 12 member “super committee” of House and Senate members tasked with tackling debt reduction should seriously consider raising the guarantee fees charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as one way to reduce government expenditures, according to the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. In a letter to the members of the Joint Select Committee to Reduce the Deficit, Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-AL, said the committee should consider raising the premiums the GSEs charge lenders to insure against the risk that borrowers will fail to repay their loans to something even higher than the White House and regulators have proposed.

Under fire by its official watchdog, as well as by a senior House Democrat, the Federal Housing Finance Agency last week announced it has directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to transition away from the GSEs’ current foreclosure attorney network programs. FHFA’s directive – which it says is in synch with the Finance Agency’s Servicing Alignment Initiative to produce uniform foreclosure processing standards – will move toward a system where mortgage servicers select qualified law firms that meet certain minimum, uniform criteria. Under current practice in certain states, each GSE designates law firms eligible to undertake foreclosure work, and mortgage servicers then select and work with these firms, according to the FHFA.

In a move that could potentially prolong already protracted litigation, a U.S. District Court judge in New York ruled last week that a proposed $8.5 billion settlement over Bank of America’s non-agency mortgage-backed securities belongs in federal and not state court.Judge William Pauley denied a motion by the Bank of New York Mellon to move the lawsuit filed by BofA Countrywide non-agency MBS investors back to New York State Supreme Court. Eleven entities sharing the name Walnut Place petitioned for the federal court venue, claiming the case’s size and complexity qualified it for a “mass action.” Judge Pauley agreed.

It has been four years since fault lines in the subprime market sent tremors through the rest of the mortgage industry and three years since the global collapse of financial markets, but lender behavior today remains driven by fear. Originators ask themselves three questions in the current market, said William Rayburn, CEO at mortgage technology provider FNC, during a panel session at the ABS East conference sponsored last week by Information Management Network. Lenders want to know whether the application will close – it costs them money if it can’t – and whether they can sell the loan if it closes, he said. Just as important...

A niche FHA mortgage insurance program could become a significant tool to help address the massive inventory of real estate owned, and soon-to-be REO, that continues to weigh on the housing market, some industry observers say. The FHA 203k program was designed to help borrowers who want to purchase a “fixer-upper” home. Started back in 1978, the program insures long-term loans that include both the purchase and rehabilitation of the property. But in 1996, the Department of Housing and Urban Development put a moratorium on issuing 203k loans to private investor-owners, citing instances of fraud and abuse and the inability to...

The U.S. Senate voted late last week to approve an amendment to a federal spending bill that was offered by Sens. Bob Menendez, D-NJ, and Johnny Isakson, R-GA, to reinstate the higher loan limits for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration that expired on Sept. 30. Those limits dropped to $625,500 in a number of high-cost markets on Oct. 1, and would be restored to $729,750 through December 2013 under the Menendez/Isakson amendment. The National Association of Home Builders was pleased.

The status quo in the MBS market – suffocating domination by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae – isn’t likely to change for the next five years, or longer, according to industry experts at this week’s ABS East conference in Miami sponsored by Information Management Network. Although a number of industry groups have offered proposals similar to the third option outlined by the Treasury Department in its reform white paper – a more competitive market of issuers backed by private capital that issue MBS with backstop guarantees from the government – those proposals are far from uniform, said Laurie Goodman, senior managing director at...