Two Harbors Investment Corp. announced last week that it has taken its first steps toward setting up a securitization issuance program, with a goal to issue a $250 million jumbo non-agency MBS sometime in 2011. The New York-based real estate investment trust will partner with Barclays Capital to close on a $100 million mortgage loan warehouse facility, which is subject to future increases. Two Harbors will buy prime, fixed-rate jumbo residential mortgages and aggregate them in the facility. It is currently targeting a $250 million deal size for the initial securitization. Barclays will act as underwriter, according to Two Harbors. The program is aimed at...

The legacy of toxic subprime and Alt A MBS from Countrywide Financial continued to spread last week, with a California appeals court deciding to allow a class action involving a number of pension funds and other institutional investors against the lender to proceed. The plaintiffs allege that Countrywide and a number of its subsidiaries, officers and U.S. investment banks violated the Securities Act of 1933 by making materially false and misleading statements in over 450 prospectus supplements relating to the issuance of more than $300 billion in subprime and Alt A securities. Specifically, plaintiffs allege the defendants misrepresented the quality of...

Pending inter-agency proposals to implement risk-retention requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act could undermine the return of private capital to the housing finance market, warned industry participants. Testifying this week during a House subcommittee hearing, the Mortgage Bankers Association and other critics of risk retention said that a narrow definition of a “qualified residential mortgage” and overemphasis on higher downpayment may have an adverse impact on credit availability. MBA Chairman Michael Berman told members of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Economic Opportunity that while...

Narrowly defined "qualified residential mortgages" under risk-retention rules and anything less than an absolute "qualified mortgage" safe harbor can severely limit credit availability and ultimately hamper the return of non-agency securitization, warned Amherst Securities Group in a new report. Arguing that risk retention may not produce any net benefit, the Amherst report said that the proposed definition of a qualified residential mortgage is too restrictive and that it may result in less mortgage credit being available. The effect would be more detrimental if Congress decides to further limit the reach of both...

The securitization market requires less of a heavy handed approach from government and a softer touch in order to restore investor confidence and lure private capital back into the market, industry executives told senators on Capitol Hill this week. Witnesses testifying before the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance and Investment said the state of the securitization market is uncertain, due to government subsidies crowding out budding private sector resurgence, as well as an overly broad, but ambiguous, interpretation of the Dodd-Frank Act by regulators. "The consequences of failing to attract sufficient private-sector capital to...

New due-diligence rules will likely result in increased costs for issuers of non-agency mortgage-backed securities and increased disclosures for investors. Due diligence firms are also divided on whether to assume the "expert liability" required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding due diligence performed on MBS. Vicki Beal, a senior vice president at Clayton Holdings, said Clayton – a leading MBS due diligence provider – would likely be willing to take on the expert liability requirements. However, she said Clayton’s assumption of the liability would require MBS issuers to pay more for Clayton's services. The SEC issued...

Industry participants warn that federal regulators' recently proposed definition for qualified residential mortgages is too stringent and will unnecessarily limit lending to prime jumbo borrowers. If the rule is adopted as proposed, many warn that issuance of non-agency mortgage-backed securities will be limited or non-existent. "While the rules do a good job of addressing and deterring abuses of subprime securitization structures, they are overly and unnecessarily harsh when applied to prime securitization structures," said Martin Hughes, president and CEO of Redwood Trust. Chris Flanagan, a managing director at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, added that...

Officials at Redwood Trust, the real estate investment trust that made headlines last year by sponsoring the first non-agency securitization of newly originated mortgages since the financial crisis began in 2008, have a favorable outlook on the residential market – yet the biggest challenge right now remains the low volume of production. Redwood Trust is upbeat about the future, for a number of reasons, according to Brett Nicholas, executive vice president and chief investment officer. "Proposals to reform the government-sponsored enterprises issued in February 2011 call for phasing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," he said during...

Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continued to shrink their mortgage portfolios as required by government regulators during the first quarter of 2011 even as the two government-sponsored enterprises posted dramatically different earnings reports for the first three months of the year. Under the terms of the purchase agreement with the Treasury Department and under Federal Housing Finance Agency regulation, both Fannie and Freddie’s mortgage-related investments portfolio are subject to a cap that decreases by 10 percent each year until each portfolio reaches $250 billion. By Dec. 31, 2011, neither company will be able to hold an unpaid principal balance for mortgage-related investments that exceeds $729 billion. “FHFA has stated that we will not be a substantial buyer or seller of mortgages for... [Includes one data chart]

The requirement from last year’s landmark financial services legislation that MBS issuers retain some of the risk associated with residential mortgages will raise the costs of securitizing them to prohibitive levels, discouraging the return of private capital and maintaining the market’s dependence on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, industry experts warn. The proposed definition of “qualified residential mortgages” under the terms of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was a major focus of concern raised during a webinar last week sponsored by Inside Mortgage Finance. “I think the big-picture news is that certainly the risk-retention regulations do what Dodd-Frank mandates that they do. But in some very important ways they go beyond that...