The Federal Housing Finance Agency this week became among the latest, most influential parties to legally weigh in on the proposed $8.5 billion Bank of America settlement over non-agency mortgage-backed securities.On Aug. 30, the deadline to file objections to the deal, the Finance Agency filed a “Notice of Appearance and Conditional Objection” with the U.S. District Court in Manhattan on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Officials with Bank of America maintain that a proposed $8.5 billion settlement related to non-agency buybacks and servicing is fair, even as opposition continues to mount. BofA also continues to take action to distance itself from “legacy” assets acquired from Countrywide Financial. “Obviously there aren’t many days when I get up and think positively about the Countrywide transaction in 2008,” BofA’s CEO Brian Moynihan said this month in a conference call with investors. “In each quarter, we continue to put risk behind us ...

The Department of Justice is reportedly investigating Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service regarding the ratings the firms placed on non-agency mortgage-backed securities. The increased attention on the rating services follows S&P’s recent downgrade of the credit rating for the U.S., revelations by a former Moody’s employee and numerous other investigations that found problems with the ratings on non-agency MBS. In a letter sent this month to the Securities and Exchange Commission, William Harrington, a former senior vice president at Moody’s, alleged that the rating service knowingly published “worthless opinions” on non-agency MBS. ...

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman blew the whistle on a pending settlement between Bank of America and MBS investors worth $8.5 billion for Countrywide non-agency MBS issued before the financial crisis. Schneiderman last week filed a lawsuit against Bank of New York Mellon – a party to the settlement – for allegedly committing fraud while acting as trustee for MBS trusts securitized by BofA, and asked the court to reject the settlement proposal. “In negotiating the proposed settlement, BNYM labored under a conflict of interest because it stands ...

The Treasury Department is making significant changes to the Home Affordable Modification Program designed to match some of the success servicers have had with proprietary loss mitigation programs.Non-agency servicers participating in the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives short sale and deed-in-lieu of foreclosure portion of HAMP need to update their policies immediately, the Treasury announced this week. The structure for servicer incentive payments on non-agency first-lien HAMP mods will also change in October. "Unless prohibited by ... [includes one data chart]

Mortgage industry veteran Lewis Ranieri says big banks will easily dodge the risk-retention requirements for mortgage securitizers that have been proposed by federal regulators. Issuers of non-agency mortgage securities that aren’t backed by “qualified residential mortgages” would have to retain a 5 percent interest in the transaction. In a joint comment letter submitted by Ranieri and Kenneth Rosen, chairman of Rosen Consulting Group, a real estate research firm, the pair warned that risk retention as proposed will benefit ...

Short of a market miracle, the chances of other Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities servicers catching up with market leaders Wells Fargo and Bank of America are practically nil. Wells Fargo and BofA appear to have a solid lock on 55.0 percent of Ginnie Mae servicing outstanding based on a combined portfolio total of $634.0 billion at the end of June. Overall, the supply of Ginnie Mae servicing grew 3.8 percent during the second quarter. Wells Fargo commanded a 28.2 percent share of Ginnie Mae servicing during the second quarter, up 4.7 percent from the first quarter. Not far behind is second-ranked BofA with a 26.6 percent share, thanks to... [Includes one data chart]

Officials testifying before a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing this week came out in strong opposition to eliminating a government guarantee in the MBS market of the future, claiming that such measures would have a significant impact on borrowers’ ability to obtain plain vanilla 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. “Many large investors utilize the MBS market to execute trades driven by macroeconomic views and would not utilize a market which combines credit risk with interest rate risk,” said Andrew Davidson, president of Andrew Davidson & Co., an analytics and consulting firm. “With a smaller investor base, liquidity would be...

Major MBS issuers are concerned about the potential harm evolving risk-retention regulations could have on securitization structures, regardless of which structure issuers decide to use. In response to the interagency proposed rule on credit risk retention, Citigroup said the public interest is not served by requiring securitizers to hold positions that are designed to take losses. “For example, all deal parties, the rating agencies and the investors are fully aware that the lowest tranche, sometimes referred to as a ‘first loss’ tranche, may take losses and no representation is made that such tranche is either investment grade or will receive...

Nationally recognized statistical rating organization Kroll Bond Rating Agency demonstrated its optimism in the non-agency market by requesting public comment this week on its rating methodology for evaluating residential MBS. “By providing complete transparency into our approach and processes, we aim to instill trust in the market and to raise the bar on ratings accuracy,” said James Nadler, Kroll’s president, in a statement. “These [publications on our proposed rating process] demonstrate our strong commitment to serving the market through a rigorous evaluation of the collateral as well as key parties in an RMBS, and combine all aspects of...