After suggesting that it would consider selling jumbos to investors via whole loan sales, Redwood Trust this week issued a $327.94 million non-agency jumbo mortgage-backed security. While the real estate investment trust has not ruled out whole loan sales, the issuance reflects confidence in the non-agency market – from Redwood and investors. Redwood’s latest security, Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-2, is similar to other recent non-agency MBS issuance by the REIT. Redwood has now issued five non-agency MBS deals since April 2010, the only non-agency MBS issuance backed by new originations since 2008. At the end of February, Redwood officials revealed that the REIT was considering bulk sales ...

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller downplayed concerns raised by investors in non-agency mortgage-backed securities regarding the pending $25.0 billion servicing settlement. “The current set of concerns aren’t particularly warranted,” he said this week during a webinar hosted by Inside Mortgage Finance Publications. The Association of Mortgage Investors has asked for a number of changes to the settlement, including a cap on the amount of principal reduction that can be completed on non-agency MBS to meet the participating servicers’ loss mitigation requirements. Miller said the AMI is the only group he is aware of that might challenge approval of the settlement by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. “I think that their concerns are not going to be realized ...

Prudential Financial this week issued a $1.0 billion bond to sell vintage subprime mortgage-backed securities. Analysts described the bond as a hybrid between an MBS and a covered bond. Standard & Poor’s gave Prudential Covered Trust 2012-1 an A rating, which was based on the rating of Prudential, not of the subprime MBS being sold. The bond was sold as a private placement and Prudential has not commented on the sale. However, in its recently released annual report for 2011, Prudential said it had transferred some of its subprime MBS holdings ...

The Treasury Department this week finished winding down its holdings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac MBS, claiming a positive return of $25 billion for the U.S. taxpayers from a market stabilization initiative launched in the teeth of the 2008 financial market meltdown. Treasury’s holdings of MBS issued by the two government-sponsored enterprises peaked at $197.6 billion in December 2009. “These MBS purchases helped preserve access to mortgage credit during a period of unprecedented market stress,” the agency said. The Federal Reserve agency MBS investment program was far bigger, peaking at $1.12...

Last week, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Judge Jed Rakoff of the District Court for the Southern District of New York erred when he blocked the $285 million agreement the Securities and Exchange Commission and Citigroup struck to settle a dispute over MBS that later turned toxic when the market tanked. Market observers think it likely means the settlement is back on track, and a good sign for the market, “with sanity and certainty prevailing,” as one put it. In U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., the district court this past November refused to approve a...

A conservative, non-partisan public interest group has filed suit against the Federal Housing Finance Agency, claiming the FHFA has improperly denied the group’s request for documents relating to the Finance Agency’s decision to sue 17 financial institutions last fall on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over alleged misrepresentations of mortgage-backed securities.Last week, Judicial Watch filed its lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the FHFA denied the group’s Freedom of Information Act request for documents related to the agency’s litigation. The Finance Agency argued that as private companies, FOIA requests do not apply to Fannie and Freddie.

Many non-agency MBS investors are upset with the $25 billion servicing settlement involving 49 state attorneys general, eight federal agencies and the nation’s five largest servicers, the full terms of which were filed in U.S. District Court this week. Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Ally Financial will receive some credit for modifying loans they service but do not own, although several of these firms have indicated that they plan to focus their efforts on portfolio loans. The Association of Mortgage Investors said the settlement establishes a precedent under which the bad debts of...

The documents governing a proposed $25.0 billion settlement involving five major banks include greater incentives for principal reduction loan modifications on portfolio loans rather than loans in non-agency mortgage-backed securities. However, non-agency MBS investors remain concerned that they could take losses due to the settlement. The consent judgments against Ally Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo were filed in federal court this week, a month after the settlement was announced by 49 state attorneys general and the federal government ...

Ginnie Mae will question certain mortgage-backed securities issuers about reporting inconsistencies in pool data submissions over the last couple of months and try to resolve those issues to avoid delay in MBS pool processing. In an audio conference with issuers last week, Ginnie Mae officials said agency staff discovered the flawed data submissions while poring over several months’ worth of pool data submitted by issuers. While most of the information fell within theVargas said the discrepancies were attributed to a small group of issuers, who will be contacted soon to work on corrections before Ginnie Mae puts stronger edits up front. She said the agency wants to ...

Principal reductions hold the potential for a positive impact on the mortgage market by preventing some foreclosures, but residential MBS investors stand to lose from an improperly implemented, wide-ranging loan modification effort, according to Fitch Ratings. The mandated principal reduction provisions in the recent $25 billion settlement involving state attorneys general, the federal government and the five largest mortgage servicers appear to be a “sensible approach” as loan modifications with principal reductions have performed better than other types of mods, but Fitch noted the benefit comes with a...