Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s total taxpayer cash infusion could top as much as $311 billion by the end of 2014 – a “savings” of some $52 billion from similar projections one year ago, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency.The FHFA this week released its updated projections of the financial performance of the two GSEs, including potential draws under the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements with the Treasury Department. "The projections have been updated to reflect the current outlook for house prices, interest rates, and recent trends toward borrower behavior,” explained the FHFA.

In a major shakeup of its executive suite, Freddie Mac’s chief executive will step down next year while three members of the GSE’s board of directors are also headed for the exits, the Federal Housing Finance Agency announced this week.Freddie CEO Charles Haldeman Jr. informed the board of his desire “to step down sometime in the coming year,” according to the FHFA announcement. Freddie did not comment on Haldeman’s resignation, nor did it make the announcement itself, referring to the Finance Agency’s official press release in its Securities and Exchange Commission 8K filing this week.

Long awaited alterations to the Home Affordable Refinance Program announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency this week are expected to be of some relief to underwater homeowners but it will do little to endear the Finance Agency to its critics, particularly among House Democrats, who think the FHFA should do more.Among the new HARP enhancements is the elimination of certain risk-based fees for borrowers who refinance into shorter-term mortgages and lower fees for other borrowers. Also removed is the current 125 percent loan-to-value ceiling for fixed rate mortgages backed by the government-sponsored enterprises.

Fannie Mae earlier this month released additional results of its new servicer evaluation program for the first half of 2011, noting that 11 out of 13 servicers in this peer group are considered on track to meet at least median performance levels.In February, Fannie rolled out its Servicer Total Achievement and Rewards (STAR) program, designed to encourage customer service improvements and better foreclosure prevention outcomes for homeowners by rating servicers on their performance in those areas. Fannie categorizes servicers into three peer groups based on the number of loans they service, with each servicer scored using the Servicer Performance Scorecard. STAR ratings are based on a five-star scale.

Under fire by its official watchdog, as well as by a senior House Democrat, the Federal Housing Finance Agency last week announced it has directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to transition away from the GSEs’ current foreclosure attorney network programs. FHFA’s directive – which it says is in synch with the Finance Agency’s Servicing Alignment Initiative to produce uniform foreclosure processing standards – will move toward a system where mortgage servicers select qualified law firms that meet certain minimum, uniform criteria. Under current practice in certain states, each GSE designates law firms eligible to undertake foreclosure work, and mortgage servicers then select and work with these firms, according to the FHFA.

Home mortgage production volume increased by 20.4 percent during the third quarter of 2011 as record-low mortgage interest rates sparked a new wave of refinancing activity. An estimated $325.0 billion in new residential mortgages were originated during the third quarter, according to a new Inside Mortgage Finance ranking and analysis. While that was up solidly from the previous three-month period, it still ranked as the second lowest quarter since the mortgage market collapsed at the end of 2008. Through the nine-month mark in 2011, total production for the year was still down 16.7 percent from...(Includes two data charts)

The Federal Housing Finance Agency this week announced a series of substantial and eagerly anticipated changes to the Home Affordable Refinance Program for borrowers with underwater Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgages. Among the new HARP enhancements is the elimination of certain risk-based fees for borrowers who refinance into shorter-term mortgages and lower fees for other borrowers. Also removed is the current 125 percent loan-to-value ceiling for fixed rate mortgages backed by the government-sponsored enterprises. Furthermore, HARP 2.0 waives “certain” representation and warranties made by...

The mortgage lending industry is more likely to see a return to higher FHA loan limits than higher Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac limits, after the Senate gave its approval to legislation that would restore higher conforming loan levels all the way around, according to one top industry lobbyist. Late last week, the Senate voted 60-38 to approve a federal spending bill that included an amendment sponsored by Sens. Bob Menendez, D-NJ, and Johnny Isakson, R-GA, that would reinstate the higher loan limits for the government-sponsored enterprises and the FHA that ended on Sept. 30. Those limits dropped from a maximum of...

The Senate voted this week to reinstate the higher conforming loan limit that expired at the end of September, heeding calls by the real estate and mortgage industries. On a vote of 60-38, lawmakers passed an amendment to the FY2012 funding bill, S. 1596, for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which, among other things, would raise the maximum loan amount that can be guaranteed by FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Introduced by Sen. Robert Menendez, D-NJ, the amendment restores the 125 percent median home price formula used to calculate the temporary higher loan limits in effect prior to Oct. 1, which was up to $729,750 in certain high-cost areas of the country and lower in other jurisdictions. After Oct. 1, the new loan limit calculation was ...

Buyback risk is raising costs throughout the mortgage industry and causing lenders to boost cred-it standards beyond the levels required by investors, according to several experts at last week’s annual convention of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “The industry is spending hundreds of millions of dollars in repurchases and defending repurchases,” said David Stevens, chairman and CEO of the MBA. At a time when lenders are being pushed to “keep skin in the game,” a 5 percent risk-retention requirement for securitization might almost seem like a better deal than the costly repurchase process, he added. Brian Chappelle said...