Fannie Mae has updated its premium recapture policy by establishing standards for remediation in cases where a lender exhibits a peculiar prepayment behavior. Under the current guide, Fannie Mae has the right to analyze MBS that have high levels of prepayments, including a review of the lender’s origination and refinancing activities to ensure compliance with the government-sponsored enterprise’s requirements. If a lender shows an unusually high level of prepayments, Fannie may restrict any refinancing practice that might inappropriately affect the prepayment pattern for Fannie mortgages...

The two sibling GSEs experienced a divergent earnings period during the fourth quarter of 2011, as Freddie Mac posted a quarterly gain, on paper anyway, while Fannie Mae announced losses, albeit at a slower pace, in a year that drove both companies even deeper into the red.Freddie posted net income of $619 million during the three month period ending Dec. 31, 2011, compared to a net loss of $4.4 billion during the third quarter. For the full year, the company reported a net loss of $5.3 billion, compared to a net loss of $14.0 billion for the full-year 2010.

A legislative effort to extend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s guarantee fee hike beyond 2021 to pay for the Gulf Coast cleanup was averted this week following some behind-the-scenes lobbying, but industry insiders remain wary of future attempts by lawmakers to milk the GSEs for cash. An amendment to the Restore the Gulf Coast Act of 2011 would have used revenue generated from GSE g-fees to help pay for the continued clean up from the BP Gulf Coast oil spill. Sponsored by Sens. Mary Landrieu, D-LA, and Richard Shelby, R-AL, the bill would establish a trust fund paid for partly by fines levied against the oil company.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency is proceeding with its initiative to dispose of GSE and government-held real estate-owned properties even as some within the industry question whether such a wide-spread REO program is necessary. Last week, the FHFA announced the first pilot transaction under its REO initiative, which is targeted to the country’s “hardest-hit” metropolitan areas, including Atlanta, Chicago, Las Vegas, Phoenix and parts of Florida.

Fannie Mae announced this week it will soon implement changes to its Lender-Placed Insurance requirements by overseeing the “forced-placed” policies itself instead of allowing banks and other financial institutions to do so. In a departure from current practices, Fannie said it would solicit proposals from insurance companies for its LPI business in an effort to “significantly reduce costs” to homeowners, taxpayers and to the GSE itself.

Fannie Mae said last week that it acted first to end its existing mortgage loan delivery contract with Bank of America because of delays in resolving repurchase issues. The GSE’s account in its quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission is at odds with BofA’s announcement two weeks ago where the bank announced in its own SEC filing that it has stopped selling to Fannie due to “increasingly inconsistent” repurchase requests by the enterprise compared to past practice.

A month after Congress voted to curtail bonus payments conferred to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives, lawmakers have yet to close the deal and send a final bill to the president’s desk for signature. In early February, both the House and Senate overwhelmingly approved the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012, which would bar members of Congress and congressional staff from using non-public, inside information for private gain. While the House version of the STOCK Act is weaker than the Senate’s, both versions retained an amendment sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-AZ and Jay Rockefeller, D-WV, to prohibit Fannie and Freddie executives from receiving multi-million dollar bonuses while the GSEs remain in federal conservatorship.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency Office of Inspector General took the FHFA to task this week for what the OIG considers the agency’s lax supervision of Freddie Mac’s relationship with its servicers. Specifically, the FHFA has not clearly defined its role regarding servicers, sufficiently coordinated with other federal banking agencies about risks and supervisory concerns with individual servicers, or timely addressed emerging risks presented by mortgage servicing contractors.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s hands-off approach to regulating Freddie Mac’s relationship with servicers is a problem, according to a new report from the regulator’s inspector general. While the FHFA has taken some steps, like its Servicing Alignment Initiative, the IG said that the regulator should be looking directly at the books of servicers and other counterparties, instead of taking the government-sponsored enterprises’ versions of events. The regulator’s ability to keep track of the GSE servicer risk might be “impaired by its lack of direct access to servicer books and records relating to the...