Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac this week both celebrated large second-quarter profits that easily exceeded their installment payments to the U.S. Treasury as the price of government conservatorship, but buried in their earnings report was the hard truth lenders know too well: contentious buyback demands showed no sign of letting up. “Our expectation [is] that the amount of our outstanding repurchase requests to seller/servicers will remain high and that we may be unable to recover on all outstanding loan repurchase obligations resulting from seller/servicers’ breaches of contractual obligations,” Fannie said. As of the end of June, the two government-sponsored enterprises had...[Includes one data chart]

Hardball conditions imposed by Freddie Mac in order to permit lenders to continue selling loans insured by Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp., over the objections of state regulators, has cast a cloud over MGIC’s already uncertain prospects. Fannie Mae has approved a new MGIC insurance entity that also has the backing of the insurance company’s home state regulator, the Office of the Commissioner of Wisconsin. But MGIC warned investors last week that Freddie’s Aug. 1 approval of the new unit is conditional and could be withdrawn at any time and ends Dec. 31, 2012. Freddie says it can and will pull...

Despite intense lobbying and political pressure from the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats, the Federal Housing Finance Agency announced this week it will hold fast to its original conclusion and not agree to Treasury Department requests to allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to offer principal forgiveness modifications. Despite the incentives offered by Treasury to pay the government-sponsored enterprises to write down principal under the Home Affordable Modification Program using Troubled Asset Relief Program funds, FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco concluded the benefits of implementing HAMP’s Principal Reduction Alternative did not outweigh the risks to the taxpayer-backed GSEs. “Given our multiple responsibilities to conserve the assets of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, maximize assistance to homeowners to avoid foreclosures, and minimize the expense of such assistance to taxpayers, FHFA concluded...

In a letter to Congressional leaders, the FHFA shed a little more light on its efforts to address GSE buybacks. Fannie and Freddie are developing...

There appear to be no immediate plans to move the GSEs beyond conservatorship status but news this week that the Federal Housing Finance Agency is actively investigating the possibilities of receivership may be designed to attract the attention of thus far indifferent policymakers and snap official Washington into action, say industry experts. The FHFA this week confirmed that it has commissioned the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers to create contingency plans for taking Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks into receivership. A Finance Agency spokesman said the hiring of PwC, which was not officially announced, is just one of a number of “ordinary regulatory activities” that the FHFA is authorized and obligated to pursue under the authority granted the agency by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.

The one-time funding vehicle of defunct and disgraced mortgage servicer Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. has asked a bankruptcy court for permission to investigate Freddie Mac and its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency. According to documents filed earlier this month in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Jacksonville, FL, Ocala Funding LLC wants to examine an $805 million transfer made to Freddie by TBW executives before the servicer collapsed with the goal of recovering assets for its creditors. TBW imploded in 2009 after federal authorities discovered that Taylor Bean defrauded Freddie, among others, to the tune of $3.0 billion. A number of TBW executives were convicted and sent to jail for their part in the fraud scheme, including former owner and CEO Lee Farkas, who was sentenced to 30-years in prison last year.

Fannie Mae is immune from punitive damage claims brought by a former staffer in her wrongful termination suit against the company as long as the GSE is under the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, a federal judge ruled last week. The ruling in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a major setback for Caroline Herron, a former Fannie vice president who left in 2007 but returned as a consultant in 2009. Herron filed suit against the GSE in June 2010, claiming she was wrongly fired for reporting what she said was Fannie’s mismanagement of the Obama administration’s housing rescue initiatives and grossly wasting public funds.

California remains the top source of new single-family mortgages for Fannie and Freddie, even as Fannie remains the dominant GSE in terms of production through the first half of the year, according to an Inside The GSEs analysis. A total of $132.2 billion of home loans on Golden State properties were securitized by the two GSEs during the first six months of 2012, accounting for 22.9 percent of their total business for the half year. That was up 46.7 percent from total California production during the first six months of 2011 as the overall GSE market rose 38.8 percent from a year ago.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency may pursue its residential mortgage-backed securities legal action against affiliates of Residential Capital LLC, Ally Financial’s defunct mortgage unit, a federal judge has ruled. Last week, Judge Denise Cote of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied ResCap’s request seeking an automatic bankruptcy stay of its numerous MBS lawsuits, including one filed by the FHFA last year. The FHFA, as GSE conservator, sued UBS Americas in July 2011 alleging that billions of dollars of MBS purchased by Fannie and Freddie were based on offering documents that contained “materially false statements and omissions.”

The Federal Housing Finance Agency should enhance its supervision of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks by taking better advantage of the FHFA’s call report system, a recent audit has concluded. The FHFA’s Office of Inspector General report noted last week that despite requiring the GSEs to enter data into the CRS, the Finance Agency has not “optimized its use of the system” to enhance oversight. “Two FHFA supervisory divisions rarely use CRS in their analysis and oversight of the enterprises,” explained the OIG audit. “Instead, they receive routine submissions of loan-level data and standard management reports containing relevant metrics and data.”