So much has been said in recent days about a possible yet cautious return to subprime mortgage lending as lenders lowered their credit-score requirements for FHA mortgages and other agency loans with certain limitations. Industry participants, however, say today’s “subprime” is a misnomer and certainly not the same toxic subprime mortgage product that pushed the U.S. financial system to the brink of collapse. Lenders are more cautious in the post-subprime era and they no longer practice risk layering on loans to borrowers with less-than-stellar credit histories as they did in the past, industry observers say. “In the past, lenders combined risk layering with low credit scores,” said Brian Chappelle, a mortgage industry consultant. “Today, I would be shocked if any lender used Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the FHA as a vehicle for traditional subprime because they would be ignoring the possibility of repurchase or indemnification.” Lenders today are...
The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s lax attention to Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s handling of aged repurchase demands has resulted in uncollected late fees charged to lenders, according to a new audit by the agency’s Inspector General. The FHFA issued a “contract harmonization directive” in January 2012 calling for the two government-sponsored enterprises to develop “consistent timelines and collection standards for fees and penalties and additional types of penalties and remedies.” During contract harmonization discussions, the report noted...
Public mention of the Treasury memo was first made earlier this month by former Solicitor General Ted Olson at a GSE shareholders rights advocacy forum in Washington.
Issuers of non-agency MBS and agency mortgage sellers have addressed most of the legacy representation and warranty issues that have bedeviled the market for the past few years, according to industry analysts. However, repurchase and buyback issues haven’t been completely resolved as investors and regulators make last grasps at recoveries. Analysts at Compass Point Analytics & Trading estimated that the total losses incurred for rep-and-warrant claims from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the FHA and non-agency MBS investors by publicly traded U.S. originators still in existence will total $89.0 billion. The analysts said lenders have charged off or reserved $88.0 billion for such losses. Compass Point said...
Losses incurred for rep-and-warrant claims tied to MBS could total $89 billion eventually. However, banks have already reserved $88 billion, according to some tallies.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac saw dramatic declines in the number of underwater mortgage refinances they acquired in the fourth quarter of 2013, according to a new Inside MBS & ABS analysis. Mortgage lenders delivered an estimated 103,878 Home Affordable Refinance Program loans to the two government-sponsored enterprises in the fourth quarter, down 49.0 percent from the previous period. Our estimate, based on loan-level MBS data, supplement Federal Housing Finance Agency figures that have been updated only through November. The final three months of last year produced...[Includes one data chart]
Freddie Mac last week announced a $1 billion offering of its Structured Agency Credit Risk debt notes, the government-sponsored enterprise’s first risk-sharing transaction of 2014 and its third such deal since the company rolled out the STACR series last year. The deal is backed by a pool of $32.4 billion 30-year fixed-rate mortgages acquired by Freddie in the second quarter of 2013. More than 65 investors participated in Freddie’s latest STACR deal, and more than 20 of those investors were newcomers, according to Kevin Palmer, vice president of single-family strategic credit costing and structuring for Freddie. “We’ve introduced...
For an industry that’s looking at a 30 percent decline in originations, we’re seeing a great deal of SEC 13-d filings by investment funds that are upping their stakes in such players as MGIC, Radian, Ocwen, Walter, EverBank and the like.
RSS