Access to mortgage credit is expanding, according to panelists at a real estate conference in Miami last week, albeit slowly, and some agree alternative scoring models are needed. Franklin Codel, executive vice president with Wells Fargo, said the company has expanded its credit parameters on FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans. “About 10 percent, maybe a little bit more, of the lending we’re doing today, a year and a half or two years ago would have been either an exception or outside our policy. We have expanded our credit box at Wells Fargo, and I think a lot of other lenders have done the same thing.”
Fannie Mae has done away with its Desktop Underwriter fee to encourage more lenders to take advantage of the tool. The GSE also has plans to introduce a new loan delivery interface in late 2015.Fannie said the new loan platform will provide lenders with “a more intuitive and easier-to-navigate user interface, enhanced reporting capabilities, and improved delivery edit messaging.” Fannie plans to provide guidance to customers on the new system in the coming weeks but said it’s being designed to help lenders deliver loans more efficiently and with greater transparency. Len Israel, president of mortgage banking with Flagstar Bank, said “Flagstar would welcome any new delivery system Fannie may have on tap to streamline processes without sacrificing quality.”
Two activist investors have authored a report highlighting the debate surrounding the facts and numbers that led to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac being placed into conservatorship in 2008. In the 27-page report, Adam Spittler and Mike Ciklin argue that the Treasury unfairly justified GSE conservatorship via “tricky accounting” methods. In the second quarter of 2008, the report said Fannie reported a net loss of $2.8 billion. But they noted some discrepancies. “As per our analysis, we must add back the non- cash Loan Loss Reserve of $5.5 billion. After this adjustment, Fannie Mae shows a cash net income figure of $3.2 billion. This is poor evidence of a ‘failing business model,’” said the report.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency released its performance review of first-quarter earnings for the GSEs this week and it stands to reason that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could post strong earnings for the second quarter. Here’s why: loan production was decent, which means guaranty fee income should be as well. But the real gain could come from rising interest rates. When rates fell during the first quarter, Fannie and Freddie booked $4.2 billion losses from the markdown on the value of derivative securities they use to hedge. Rates increased in the second quarter, which means the question now becomes: how much of a gain will the two book? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reported continued profitability in the first quarter of 2015...
Wells Fargo was the top seller to Freddie Mac in 2Q with $12.6 billion, according to newly compiled figures from Inside Mortgage Finance, but BofA was a somewhat close second...
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac saw a robust 22.3 percent increase in their single-family business during the second quarter of 2015, according to a new Inside Mortgage Finance ranking and analysis. The two government-sponsored enterprises issued a combined $232.36 billion of single-family mortgage-backed securities during the second quarter. It was their strongest quarterly production level since the third quarter of 2013, and it lifted ... [Includes three data charts]
Prior to the financial crisis and the government takeover of Fannie and Freddie, some seller-servicers had “strategic alliance” deals that allowed them to pay under 15 basis points in g-fees...
RSS